ML19254B348
| ML19254B348 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 08/06/1979 |
| From: | Dail L DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19254B347 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909270349 | |
| Download: ML19254B348 (2) | |
Text
DUKEEDOTVER. COMPANY
~
~
ELECT 1 tic CENTElt, HOX 33189, CII AltLOTTE. N. C.
2M242 odSb'35'h6 l9 IUC 10 All 00 August 6,1979
^
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re:
Catawba Nuclear Station RII:
RJH Inspection Reports: 50-413/79-11 and 50-414/79-12 Duke File: CN-1412.ll-1
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
In the referenced inspection reports, certain items of non-compliance were identified.
Duke Power's response to these items is enclosed.
Duke Power does not consider any of the information contained in these reports to be proprietary.
Very truly yours, l_. C. Dail, Vice-President Desis, Engineering EKM/ cam Attachment 7909270349 1046 237-49dM6c
nse to Infraction 50-417/f9-12-02 Duke Res and 50-414/79-12-02-QAP Procedure-P1
./
/
Mr. Hardwick identified one deficiency with two uamples where the instructions of QA Procedure P-1 were not followed. Below is Duke's response to each example.
1.
In the example involving " Vendor Quality Assurance Certification,"
the corrected documentation was received from the vendor on 8/1/79.
QA personnel workit.g in this area of responsibility have been re-instructed in the proper handling of documentation approval, full compliance was achieved by 8/1/79.
2.
In the example involving signature deficiencies on Form P-1 A, explanatory notes have been added to the form to clarify the concerns identified by the inspector. QA personnel working in this area of responsibility have been instructed in the proper handling of documentation approval. Additionally, QA Procedure P-1 is being revised to clarify site release of items.
Full com-pliance will be achieved by 9/1/79.
1046 238
..