IR 05000498/1987065
| ML20153D663 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 08/26/1988 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153D654 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-498-87-65, 50-499-87-65, NUDOCS 8809020279 | |
| Download: ML20153D663 (29) | |
Text
-_-
_
O APPENDIX TO SALP BOARD REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
SYSTEMATIC ASSESStiENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE NRC Inspection Report 50-498/87-65; 50-499/87-65 Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P)
SouthTexasProject, Units 1and2(STP)
.lanuary 1 through December 31, 1987 NV go90% W O
. -.
.
a .
MEETING SUMMARY Date: April.13, 1988 Licensee: Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P)
Facility: SouthTexasProject, Units 1and2(STP)
License: NPF-76/CPPR-129 Docket: 50-498; 50-499 SUBJECT: SALP MEETING AT STP On April 13, 1988, the Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IV, members of the Region IV staff, and an NRR representative met with representatives of
.HL&P in an open meeting at STP to discuss the SALP Board Report covering the period January 1 through December 31, 1987. A copy of the NRC material presented at the meeting is attached. The meeting was held at the request of NRC, Region I After opening remarks by the Deputy Regional Administrator, the Directo Division of Reactor Projects, Region IV, presented each of the functional areas evaluated in the SALP Board Report using Attachment 2 as an outline. An opportunity for comments regarding each of the SALP categories was made available. The HL&P representatives provided general remarks regarding the SALP Board Repor Attachment:
NRC Material Presented at Meeting
_ _ _ _ _
-
, ,
(
!
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCtNISSION SYSTEMATIC ASSESSENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE EETING HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CWPANY SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 18 2 JANUARY 1,1987 - DECEMEER 31,1987 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT VISITORS CEN1ER APR!i.13,1988 10 _
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. .
I SALP PROGRAM ORJECTIVES i
IMPROVE LICENSEE PERFORMANCE PROVIDE A BASIS FOR ALLOCATION OF l
NRC RESOURCES l
l IMPRWE NRC REGULATORY PROGR#i (
i t
l f
l
,
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
a .
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AREAS FOR SOUTd TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 18 2 PLniT OPERATIONS B.- PREOPERATIONAL TESTING STARTUP TESTING PAINTENANCE SURVEILLANCE FIRE PROTECTION QUALITY PROGRAMS N O ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AFFECTING OUALITY 1. CONSTRUCTION 2. OPERATIONS TRAINING AND 00AL1FICATIONS EFFECTIVENESS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SECURITY RADIOLOGICAL C0fRROLS C0fRAlteENTS, SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, AND PAJOR STEEL SUPPORTS PIPING SYSTEt43 AND SUPPORTS SAFETY-1 LATED C0FFONENTS -
MEOWi! CAL AUXILIARY SYSTEMS 1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPtENT :
AfD CABLES INSTRtFENTATION i LICENSING ACTIVITIES i
.
_ . . ._
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O e r FUNCTIONAL AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY CATEGORY 1 REDU D NRC ATTENTION f%Y BE APPROPRIAT LIGNSEE fW4AGiffiT ATTENTION NfD IfNOLVEfffU ARE AGGRESSIVE AfD ORIEfGED TOWARD NUCLEAR SAFETY; LIGNSEE RES00RGS ARE AMPLE AffD EFFECTI\ELY USED S0 THAT A HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORfWJG WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETV IS BEING /,CHIEVE . . __ ___ . _ ___
. .
I CATE@RY 2 NRC ATTENTION SHOULD BE t%ItiTAINED AT NORt%L LEVEL LIGNSEE MANAGEtENT ATTEtCION AND ltN0LVEtENT ARE EVIDENT AND ARE CONGRNED WITH iAJCLEAR SAFETY; LIGNSEE RESOUR&S ARE ADEQUATE AND ARE REAS0tMBLY EFFECTIVE SO THAT SATISFACTORY PERFORt%NG WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIOfML SAFETY IS BEING ACHIEVE :
,
'
i l
.
. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ____ __________-_ _ ___ __ _ _______ _ _ _ CATEGORY 3 BOTH NRC AND LICENSEE ATTEt(TION SHOULD BE INCREASED. LIGNSEE t%fMGEMENT ATTENTION OR ltNOLVEENT IS ACCEPTABLE AND C0t4SIDERS FAJCLEAR SAFETY, BUT WEAKtESSES ARE EVIDENTI LIGNSEE RESOURGS APPEAR TO BE STRAINED OR NOT EFFECTIVELY USED S0 THAT Mitilt%LLY SATISFACTORY PERF0 WANG WITH RESPECT TO CPERAT10tML SAFETY IS BEING ACHIEVED,
,
l l
a .
.
EVALUATION CRITERIA i
1. thfMGEKffT IfN0LVEKf6 AfiD C0f4 TROL IN ASSURING OUALITY 2. APPROACH TO RESOLUTION OF TEOf41 CAL ISSUES FROM A '
SAFETY STANDPOINT 3. RESPONSIVENESS TO NRC INITIATIVES 4. EtEORCEEffT HISTORY S. OPERATIONAL EVENTS (If4CLUDING RESPONSE T0, AfMLYSIS OF, AffD CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR)
6. STAFFING (INCLUDING VN4AGEKffT)
!
i
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ . . - _ -_ _ - _
?
'
.
,
I e
r STRENGTHS j
COOD PROGRAMS Al'S INPi. ACE FOR OPERATION OF UNIT TE QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR CONSTRUCTION OF UNIT 2 IS l BEING PERFORE D IN AN EFFECTIVE MANNE MANAGEE NT INVOLVEE NT IS EVIDENT IN All. ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION i
)
!
f
, i i
?
I l
-
r I
!
I l
'
,
'
l
>
l
?
!
t
!
)
>
f
{
f
.__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
!
.. .
EAKNESSES SECURITX SECURlW DEFICIENCIES RESULTED IN A SIGNIFICAf(T DELAY IN THE ISSUANG OF THE OPEP! JING LIENS OPERATIONS STRONG PROGRAMS FOR OPERATIONS DID NOT RESULT IN A HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORfMNE SUBSEQUF.ffT TO ISSUANE OF TK LOW POWER LIE NS .
!
t
!
i
!
_____ ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ . - _ _ _
-
_, _ _ - _ _ - _ - - - _ - -
_ _ _ - _ _ - - . _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
. . .
o PLANT OPERATIONS CATEGORY 2 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE NOT ALWAYS BEEN EFFICIENT OR INITIALLY EFFECTIV '
PERFORf%NE DECLINED AFTER ISSUANG OF OPERATING LIENS TKRE IS GOOD EVIDENE THAT HL&P IS LEARNING FROM THE REENT ERRORS N4D THAT PERFORMAN E IS IMPROVIN RECCft1 ENDED LICENSEE ACTION THE LIENSEE SHOULD MOVE FORWARD IN A DELIBERATE, C0fRROLLED FWiNE .
I
!
(
- - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - - - _ _ ____.____ a
i
- *
PPEOPERATIONAL TESTING CATEGORY 2
,
THE TEST PROGRNi HAS BEEli GEfERALLY EFFECTIVE AND HAS HAD FEW PROBLEMS, PEC0fHEffDED LICENSEE ACTION EwHASIZE THE NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL C0FNITMEfRS.
l
'
i
____ ___
.. .
STARTUP TESTING
[AIFGORY2 PERFORMAf4CE DURING INITIAi CORE LOADING WAS INDICATIVE OF AN ADEQUATE PROGRM1 AND STI.ONG f%NAGEfENT IfNOLVEPENT. A DELAY IN T11E STARTUP OF UNIT 1 HAS RESULTED IN A LIMITED NUMBER OF STARTUP ACTIVITIES BEING INSPECTED DURING THE SALP APPRAISAL PERIO REC 0ftENDED LICENSEE ACTION ENSURE GOOD COORDINATION OF STARTUP ACTIVITIES NO POWER ASCENSION TESTING WIT 11 NORf%L PLNiT OPERAT10f4 ,
i I
l
1 \
E
_. . - . __ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.. ,
t
MAINTUlANCE CATEGORY 2 THE ELEFENTS OF A STRONG f%lf!TEftANCE PROGRAM APPEAR TO BE IN PLAC SOK PROBLEMS HAVE BEEll OBSERVED IN THE IMPLEWiiTATION OF TlilS PROGRA MANAGEf1EilT AND CORRECTIVE ACTIOil SYSTEMS APPEAR TO BE WORKlflG TO RESOLVE THE IDENTIFIED PROBLEM REC 0 MENDED LICENSEE ACTION THE LICEf4SEE SHOULD CONTINUE STAFFING EFFORT TO SUPPORT '
UNIT 2 ACTIVITIES AND C0ffT!fiUE UPGRADING PAINTENAN&
PROCEDURES BASED ON EXPERIENC ,
i
'
--
l
. .
t'
.S118yEILLANT l CATEGORY 2 CONCERN ABOUT THE ADEQUACY OF THE IDENTIFICATION OF TS REQUIRENNTS AND IWLEENTATION OF THESE REQUIREENTS INTO SURVEILLANG PROGDURE PROGRNi TO PRECLUDE MISSED TESTS IS ACEPTABL REC 0FfE GED LICENSEE ACIjpg
.
NRC ENCOURAGES THE Ll&NSEE TO KEEP LEARCHING FOR WEAKNESSES IN THE SURVEILLANCE PROGRA . - . .
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ .
_
.. .
FIE PROTECTION CATEGORY 2 CONCERNS AND OUESTIONS WERE PROMPTLY REVIEWED NO ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS TAKEN OR IfliTIATED Off A T!fELY BASIS BY TIE LICENSE PROGRNi IS SUCH THAT TIE CONSEQUEf4CES OF A FIRE SHOULD f0T AFFECT THE SAFE OPERAT10ft OR SHtJTDOWN OF THE PLAN PEC0ffEf0ED LICENSEE ACTIONS PN4AGEFENT SHOULD C0ffTINUE THE LEVEL OF ATTENTION IN THE FIRE PROTECTION / PREVENTION PROGRNi N4D ENSURE THAT TIE PROGRNi IS ADEQUATELY IMPLEFEffTED NO PAINTAlfE ,
r
.
-
. _ _ . _ . - - . - - . ,_,,.3
_
- - _, ,,, .. .
l
00ALITY PROGRAMS AND ADMIhSI'RATIVE CONTROLS AFFiCTI NG 0. AL: TY CA"EGORY 1 (CONSTRUCTION)
CA 'EG01Y 2 (OPERATIONS)
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR C0t1STRUCT10N IS BEING PERF0 PIED IN AN EFFECTIVE TWINE KVlY ASPECTS OF THE OPERAT!0f4S CA ACTIVITIES ARE ':ORKING WELL. HOWEVER, THE ENFORCEFEtiT ACTIONS SHOW WEAKNESSES IN THE IMPLEFENTATION OF THE PROGRA THE PERFORMANCE OF OPERATIONS 0A/0C HAS BEEN ACCEPTABLE BUT IS ?OT VIEWED AS AGGRESSIV REC 0ftfENDED LICENSEE ACTION SHOULD CONTINUE CURRENT LEVEL OF EWHASIS Off CCNSTRUCTION GA PROGRA%
THE OPERATIONS CA PROGRAM SHOULD DEVOTE APPRCPRIATE RESOURCES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CCtNITMENTS AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE FWiAGEFEf6 OVERVIEW OF THIS FUNCTIONAL AREA. THIS EFFORT SFOULD BE FOCUSED ON GETTING IN FRONT OF QUAL.lTY ISSUE _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
. .
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION EFFECTIVENESS CATEGORY 2
~
MANAGEFENT IS GENERALLY RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS FOR RETRAINING OR REFRESHER TPAINING WHILE FEETING LICENSING t REQUIREFEtG TRAINING WITHIN THE SECURITY DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN UfRCCEPTABLE BUT THAT TREND HAS BEEN REVERSE REC 0ffENDED LICENSEE ACTIONS C0ffT!NUE TO PURSUE INP0 ACCREDITATIO MANAGEMEffT SHOULD CONTINUE TO UPGRADE THE PLAfC SPECIFIC SIMULATOR TO ENSURE IT ACCURATELY REFLECTS THE CURRENT PLNiT DESIG l _ _ - - - _ _ _ ._ _ __ __
.. .
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CATEGORY 2 THE L! NSEE DEf0NSTRATED THE ABILITY TO IPPLEffffT THEIR EFERGENCY PLAN AND PROCEDURES DURING THE #4NUAL EXERCIS THE LI NSEE SUCCESSFULLY CORRECTED DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING THE DECEMBER 1986 EFERGENCY PREPAREDfESS l APPRAISAL INSPECTIO DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DUR!f1G TIE APRIL 1987 EFERGENCY EXERCISE IflDICATED Ti%T TRAINING FETHODS AND PROCEDURES REQll! RED ADDIT 10NAL IPPROVEFENTS, hHICH ARE BEING PURSUED BY THE LICENSE RECOWENDED LICENSEE AcTrofis t
LIGNSEE fW1AGEFENT SHOULD CONTINUE TO ENSURE THAT FACILITIES, EQUIPFENT, AND PROCEDURES ARE TESTED BY WALKTHROUGHS, DRILI.S. EXERCISEE, AND ROUT!fE INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANG TYPE INSPECTIONS TO VERIFY THAT THE!R EFERGEfC/ PREPAREDNESS POSTURE REF% INS ADEQUATE FOR Ni CPERATiliG PLANT.
l 1 I
,
1 :
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. .
SECURITY & SAFEGUARDS CATEGORY 3 SIGNIFICAIR WEAKNESSES IN SECURITY MAf;AGEMENT, SECURITY ORGANIZATION. TRAINING NO QUALIFICATIONS OF SECURITY PERSONNEL. THE LACK OF EFFECTIVr. NESS OF THE SECURITY PROGRAM DELAYED ISSUANCE OF THE LOW POWER Oh! RATING LICENS CORPORATE FW4AGEMNT TOCK AN ACTIVE ROLE IN RESTRUCTURl'4G THE SECURITY ORGNilZATION NID TRANSFERRING EXPERIENCED #to EFFECTIVE MANAGERS If4TO POSITIONS OF Alm 0RIT SIGNIFICANT DESIG1 AND CONSTRUCTION ERRORS IN THE SECURITY SYSTEMS WERE IDEIRIFIED N O CORRECTED BY PROVIDING THE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO COBPLETE THE TASK OF REBUILDING THE PERlfETER, INTRUSION DETECT 10f4 SYSTEM, NO A3SESSMENT AID THE SECURITY ORGANIZATION APPEARS TO HAVE AN AFPLE NUMBER OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL AND CONTRACT UNIFORE D OFFICERS, L'O MEET TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, TO IFPLEENT THE SECURITY PLANS AND SATISFY THE REGULATION AN EXTENSIVE SECURITY PROGRN4 UPGRADE l$ UNDERWAY IN
'
ACCORDANCE WITH LICENSE C0f141TMENTS AND SUPFLEMENTARY SIP LETTER THE SECURITY PROGRNi HAS SHOWN A POSITIVE UPWARDS TREND IN !
THE LAST QUARTER OF THIS EVALUATION PERIO RECOMMENDED LICENSEE ACTIONS FOR UNIT 2 THE LICENSEE SHOULD PLAN FOR THE EARLIEST
'
POSSIBLE LOCKDOWN OF ALL AREAS TO ENSURE PROPER
.,
IffLEKfRATION OF THE SECURITY PLA TtE LICENSEE SHOULD CONTINUE TO C0ff41T THE NECESSARY RESOURCES TO COMPLETE THOSE ACTIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE FUEL LOAD LICENSE AND THE LATEST REVISION CF THE PHYSICAL SECURITY PLN ;
i
___ _ ___ _______ ___- _____
.. .
P&l0LOGICALCONTROLS
,
CATEGORY 2 LIGt1SEE'S RADIATION SAFETY PROGRNi /PPEARED TO LACK THOROUGHNESS AND DEPTH If1 RESOLVING ITEMS IDEf(TIFIED DURING THE PREOPERATIOflAL PROGrwt. LICENSEE WAS NOT TIFELY IN CLOSING OUT ITEMS IN THIS ARE CON &RNS RAISED BY THE NRC IN THE AREA 9 0F WASTE FWMGEFENT AND EFFLUEf(T MONITORING HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED BY TIE L!%NSEE. F#tAGEFEf6 IfNOLVEFENT WAS EVIDEffT IN THE AREA 0F WATER CHEMISTRY, RADl0 CHEMISTRY, AND CONFIRPATORY MEASUREFENT AT THE TifE OF THE SALP REPORT, PREOPERATIONAL TESTING FOR ALL RADWASTE SYSTEMS HAD NOT FET SCFEDULED COFPLETION DATE REC 0ftENDED LICENSEE ACTION
,
ESTABLISH BETTER C0ftUff! CATION BETHEEf1 THE RADIATION PROTECTION DEPARTFEfR AND PLANT PANAGEFEffT TO ENSURE THAT RADIATION PROTECTION PROBLEMS REGIVE THE NEGSSARY ATTENTIO l
,
f
_ - _ _ _ _ _
. .
P CONTAlftBfT, SA ET'-R1ATD S"RUCTURES AND MAJORS ti_ SU%fES CATEGORY 1 THE LICENSEE, ENGINEERING, NfD CONSTRUCTION fW4AGEbEf6 IfNOLVEMENT IS AGGRESSIVE AND EVIDEN REC 0ftENDED llCENSEE ACTION MANAGEBEf6 ATTENTION SHOULD BE f%INTAINED AT THE SME LEVEL IN UNIT 2 TO ASSURE THAT THE DESIRED CUALITY IS ACHIEVE _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
,
PIPING SYSTEMS AND SUPPORTS CATEGORY 2 RESPONSES TO IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES WERE T!KLY WITH ACCEPTABLE RESOLUTION Ll&NSEE FANAGEMNT IS EVIDENT AND EFFECTIV RECOME NDED LICENSEE ACTION CONTINUED EMPHASIS MUST BE PAINTAINED TO ACHIEVE TK DESIRED LEVEL OF QUALIT . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.. .
SAFETY-RELATED COMP 0NEfffS - ECHANICAL CATEGORY 2 ATTEhTION TO DETAIL AND IfNOLVEFENT IN THE PROGRAM IS EVIDEN CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR IDENTIFIED CONCERNS AND PROBLEMS HAS BEEN EFFECTIV REC 0ffMED LICENSEE ACTION ATTENTION SHOULD CONTl?AJE AT ITS PRESENT LEVEL AND POSSIBLY INCREASE AS EQUIPMENT IS FINISHED AND PREPARED TO BE TURNED OVER TO STARTUP FOR TESTIN .
J
_____
. .
AUXILIARY SYS1 EMS CATEGORY 1 PERS0fiNEL ARE WELL TRAINED MiD KN0btEDGEABL LICENSEE t%NAGEMENT ATTENTION INCREASED DURING THE LATTER PART OF THE APPRAISAL PERIOD BY IMPLEfftRING A PROGR/M TO ENHANCE THE INSPECTION EFFORT OF THE HVAC ACTIVITIES IN ,
hHICH VIOLATIONS WERE IDEfff! PIE i REC 0Ffff0ED LICENSEE ACTION THE LICENSEE SHOULD CONTItME EFFORTS If4 ORDER TO ASSURE THAT THE DESIRED LEVEL OF CUALITY IS ACHIEVED N O MAINTAINED IN UNIT ,
f i
l l
l
!
l l
\
l \
l
I L j
. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __- _ _ ____ ____-_____________ . __
. .
ELECTRICAL EQUIRiWT AND CABLES CATEGORY 2 PANAGEMENT ATTEffTION AND llNOLVEMENT ARE EVIDEll WORK ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPffNT AND CABLE ARE BEING CONDUCTED IN Ni ACCEPTABLE PANNE RECOf4 ENDED LICENSEE ACTION LICENSEE PANAGElEilT IfNOLVEFENT IN THIS AREA SHOULD C0fRINUE AT A LEVEL C0ftENSURATE WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
l l
l
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
,
. ..
INSTRlENTATION CATEGORY 1 TfE FEW DEFICIENCIES THAT DID OCCUR WERE PROPERLY IDENTIFIE *
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WERE IMPLEFEfRED TO THE EX5.l4T THAT REPETITIVE EVEffTS RARELY OCCURRE RECCffENDED LICENScE ACTION :
ALTHOUGH LICENSEE FWWifENT ATTENTION IS EVIDENT, CONTif0ED EMPHASIS MUST BE h%INTAINED TO ASSURE A HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORtWiCE WITH RESPECT TO ACHIEVING CONSTRUCTION QUALIW IN UNIT [
i
.
!
l
-. -. _-. ..
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
,
'
< ,
LICENSING ACTIVITIES l CATEGORY 2 fMNAGEEffT IfNOLVEEf6 AND CONTROL Ifi LICENSING ACTIVITIES APPROPRIATELY EWHASIZES QUALITY BLIT, ON OCCAS!0N, DOES NOT ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME TO ^'HIEVE I j i
THE TECHillCAL EXPERTISE DIRECTED TOWARD RESOLVING -
REGULATORY ISSUES IS SATISFACTOR THE LICENSEE IS RESPONSIVE TO NRC INITIATIVE ,
RECCANENDED LICENSEE Actron THE TIMELINESS AND QUALITY OF THE REPORTS TO NRC SHOULD BE IMPROVED AS THE LICENSEE'S TECHNICAL STAFF MAKES TK TRANSITION TO FULLY OPERATIOfML STATU !
l
!
<
$
i
. . _ _ . -_ -.. . . . - _ _ - - .. . _ _ - _ _ - _ . - _ . _ . . - - _ _ . _