IR 05000369/1979014

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-369/79-14 on 790221-23.Noncompliance Noted: Improper Cable Termination
ML19269D352
Person / Time
Site: McGuire Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/20/1979
From: Bryant J, Walters D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19269D345 List:
References
50-369-79-14, NUDOCS 7906020128
Download: ML19269D352 (4)


Text

.

.

~

.

UNITED STATES

  1. g M49'o,k

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f}

REGION il

t 101 M ARIETTA STREET, N.W.

'

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 3o303

%*****/

Report No. 50-369/79-14 Licensee: Duke Power Company P. O. Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name: McGuire Unit 1 Docket No.

50-369 License No.

CPPR-83 Inspection at McGuire site near Charlotte, North Carolina Inspector:

em

%

C 3[c 7')

,

~

D. K. Walte d l

' Da'te Signed b_

o!79__

Approved by: [

A

,

J. C. Bryant, S(cf.lon Chigi, RCEES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on February 21 - 23, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 20 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of steam line pressure and radiation monitor instrumentation installation and records, instrument cable installation and records, and follow-up on Unresolved Item 369/79-11-03.

Results Of the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in four areas; one apparent item of noncompliance was found in one area (Deficiency - Improper cable termination - Paragraph 3).

2265 195 7906020128

.

.

.

,

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • J. C. Rogers, Project Manager
  • E. B. Miller, Senior QA Engineer
  • G. W. Grier, Project Engineer
  • K. S. Kisida, QA Engineer
  • J. W. Glenn, Associate QA Engineer
  • C. P. Rogers, Steam Production
  • E. E. Estes, Steam Froduction T. E. Touchstone, Senior Construction Engineer K. W. Algood, Associate Engineer C. Smith, QC Inspector
  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 23, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.

The status of unresolved item 369/79-11-03 and deficiency 369/79-14-01, cable 1*NC752 lead reversal at transmitter INCFT 5050, was discussed in detail. The licensee acknowledged this finding.

3.

Licensee action on Previous 1.,spection Findings (Closed) Unresolved item 369/79-11-03; cable 1*NC752 lead reversal at transmitter INCFT 5050. The licensee reported that there was no docu-mentation authorizing the cable lead reversal, and had determined that the internal leads of the transmitter had also been rolleu to provide the required continuity for satisfactory circuit operation. The instrument circuit had been released to the Duke Power Company (DPC) Steam Production and was operating satisfactorily.

This failure to terminate cable 1*NC752 ns required by drawing number HC 1785-09.01 at transmitter INCFT 5050 is an apparent item of noncompliance and is identified as deficiency 369/79-14-01, cable 1*NC752 lead reversal at transmitter INCPT 5050.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

2265 196

....

.'

.

-2-5.

Instrumentation (Components and Systems II) - Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector selected steam line pressure instrumentation associated with steam line pressure transmitter ISMPT 5080 and area radiation monitoring instrumentation associated eith radiation sensor 1 EMF 16 for inspection. The instrumentation was inspected to assure that FSAR and QA Manual requirements were being met in the areas of circuit and component identification, location, protection, cleanliness preservation and inspection.

The installation of steam line pressure instrumentation was observed from transmitter ISMPT 5080, including sensing lines and other associ-ated devices, to indicator ISMP 5082 mounted on the Auxilliary Feedwater Pump Turbine Panel 1A. Transmitter ISMPT 5080 was installed per the requirements of DPR drawing ICS-A-11, revision 3, " Mechanical Instrumen-tation and Controls, Instrument Standards, Installation Field Practices".

The installation of area radiation monitor instrumentation was observed from the refueling canal area sensor 1 EMF 16 to area radiation cabinet 1 ARC 1.

Within the areas inspected, there were no items of noncompliance or deviations identified.

6.

Instrumentation (Components and Systems II) - Review of Quality Records The inspector reviewed the quality records for the steam line pressure instrumentation identified in paragraph 5.

The records were reviewed to assure that FSAR and QA Manual requirements were being met in the areas of receipt inspection, vendor certification, storage, handling, 'denti-fication and QC installation inspection.

Within the areas examined, there were no items of noncompliance or deviations identified.

7.

Instrumentation (Cables and Terminations II) - Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector selected the seven instrument cables listed below for inspection.

1*SH524 1*SH539 1*SM542

t 1o7 LLDJ l//

1 EMF 614

-.

...-

--

.,

....

.

.

-3-

'

1 EMF 615 1 EMF 578 IEMF579 The cable work activities were inspected to assure that FSAR and QA Manual requirements were being met in the areas of identification, use of specified material, inspection, size and type of cables and termination components, circuit location and routing, circuit protection and separation, wireway grounding and bonding, wireway loading and cable terminations.

Cable terminations were verified using cable connection drawings. Cable routing was verified using cable installation data sheets. Cable instal-lation inspections had been performed per DPC QA procedure M-40, " Electrical Cable Installation and Inspection". Terminations were not observed for cables IEMF578 and IEM579.

Within the areas inspected, there were no noncompliances or deviations identified.

8.

Instrumentation (Cables and Terminations II) - Review of Quality Records The quality records for cables 1*SM524,1*SM539 and 1*SM542 were examined to assure that the FSAR and QA Manual requirements were being met in the areas of receipt inspection, materials certification, and installation.

Cable installations had been documented on Cable Installation Data cards per DPC QA procedure M-40.

Within the areas inspected, there were no items of noncompliance or devie,tions identified.

2265 198

.

-.

y