IR 05000369/1979024

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-369/79-24 & 50-370/79-12 on 790522-25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection, Electrical Work,Instrumentation Work & Quality Records
ML19242D486
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/18/1979
From: Conlon T, Gibbons T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19242D473 List:
References
50-369-79-24, 50-370-79-12, NUDOCS 7908150302
Download: ML19242D486 (4)


Text

..

pa ascoq'o, UNITED STATES

+

'%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l'

..

'

$.", 7, [

101 MARIE TT A sT., N W., sulT E 310o

$

REGION 11 o, p. q).

5,.

'\\,'

c['

AT L ANT A, GE ORGI A 30303

.....

Report Nos. 50-369/79-24 and 50-370/79-12 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 S. Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility: McGuire Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 License Nos. CPPR-83 and CPPR-84 Inspection at McGuire Site near Charlotte, North Carolina 0[79 C'

s/

'I u

Inspector: I.D.GibMn,s Date Signed 4-// f!77 Approved LC gy T. E. Conlon, Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on May 22-25, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 29 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of:

Fire Protection; Electrical Work and Quality Records, Instrumentation Work and Quality Records.

Results Of the areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

79081503 7'i G30205

.

.

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • J. C. Rogers, Project Manager
  • G. W. Grier, Project Engineer
  • E. B. Miller, Project Senior QA Engineer
  • K. S. Kisida, QA Engineer
  • J. W. Glenn, A.sociate QA Engineer P. D. Sykes, Safety Supervisor
  • Attended exit interview.

2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 25, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

5.

Independent Inspection Effort (Units 1 and 2)

The inspector conducted a walk through inspection examining electrical equipment and raceways in the control, and auxiliary building.

The battery chargers, and static inverters were also examined.

6.

Procedures - Fire Prevention / Protection (Units 1 and 2)

The inspector reviewed DPC-CP-160 Project Fire Brigade and Firefighting procedure to assure that use, testing and maintenance of fire related auxiliary equipment was adequately covered.

The use of radio, beepers and electronic megaphones for fire fighting communications has been planned. Ten fire extinguishers wer~ examined to assure that the proper inspections had been conducted.

Four welding and one flame cutting operations were observed to assure DPC-CP-54, " Fire Protection During Cutting and Welding Operations" was being followed.

Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance or devia-tions identified.

0302C6

..

'

-2-7.

Instrumentation (Components and Systems) - Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 1)

The Control Room Radiation Monitors EMF-43A and B were selected to assure that the QAM requirements were met in the areas of identification location, protection and cleanliness. The calibration of the monitors is to be done by power production dcpartment.

Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance or devia-tions identified.

8.

Instrumentation (Cable and Terminations) - Review of Quality Records (Unit 1)

The inspector selected four cables IEMF568, IEMF569, IEMF570, and IEMF571 for a quality records review to assure that the requirements of QA Proce-dures M40 and P1 were complied with in the areas of receiving inspection including material certification, installation separation, protection, identification of raceways, and terminations.

Nonconformance Reports 7010, 7090, 7139, 7621, 7893, 8060, and 8175 were examined to assure that QAP Q1 requirements were being complied with in the areas of current status, legibility, review of QC,tetrievable and that the corrective actions appeared adequate.

The qualification records of two QA engineers and three QC inspectors were examined to assure that the records required by QAP J1 and QA-131 were complete and current.

The records indicated that QA/QC personnel were qualified for their duties.

Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance or devia-tions identified.

9.

Electrical (Components and Systems) - Observations of Work and Work Activities (Unit 2)

The inspector reviewed the receiving inspection and storage in place of Emergency Diesel Generator 2A. The electrical im tallation has not been completed.

The 4160 volt Switchgear 2 ETA was examined to assure that receiving inspection, identification, installation procedures, inspection, nonconformance con rol, protection, cleanliness, calibration, location, separation, redundancy, and drawing / procedure control co:. formed to the QAM procedures. A 600 volt load center 2ELXE and three 600 volt motor control centers 2EMXE, 2EMXA, 2EMXC were examined to assure that the QAM procedural requirements are being complied with in the areas of receivin s inspection, storage handling, identification, installation, inspection, testing, nonconformance control, location and qualification of inspectors.

630207

~

,.

,

-3-Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.

10.

Electrical (Components and Systems) - Review of Quality Records (Unit 1)

The inspector selected the following equipment for a review of Quality Records:

a.

Emergency Diesel Generator 2A b.

5F3' Switchgear 2 ETA c.

600V Load Ceriter 2ELXE d.

600V Motor Control Center 2EMXE e.

600V Motor Control Center 2EMXA f.

600V Motor Control Center 2EMXC The receiving inspection, material certifications, and test reports were reviewed to assure that QAM requirements were complied with.

Items b, c, and f installation records were reviewed to assure that the correct item was installed, the required inspections were completed and the necessary post-installation protection was installed.

Four QA audits E2-12-78, E4-1-79, E3-2-79 and El-1-79 were reviewed to assure that the required audits were performed and that the deficiencies were corrected.

Ten random inspection worksheet (M40-C) reports were reviewed to assure that the requirements of QA procedure M40 were being complied with.

The worksheets reviewed were E222, E231, E233, E242, E245, E255, E274, E299, E353 and E482.

These worksheets were examined for current status, legibility, completness, technical review and that the required correc-tive action was adequate and complete.

Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.

63020S