IR 05000369/1979022
| ML19241C157 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 05/24/1979 |
| From: | Herdt A, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19241C149 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-369-79-22, 50-370-79-11, NUDOCS 7907270387 | |
| Download: ML19241C157 (4) | |
Text
'
.
UNITED STATES
'
+! '.,,.
'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RE GION 11
,
' - * - '
s
!
101 WARIETT A sT, N.W., sulTE 3100 o
E ATLANTA, GEORGI A 3o303 o
.....
Report Nos. 50-369/79-22 and 50-370/79-11 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 2824'?
Facility Name: McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 License Nos. CPPR-83 and CPPR-84 Nuclear Station, near Charlotte, North Carolina Inspection at r
//7f d
Inspecto-)
//
'
Approved b :
C
'E'
A. R. Herd:., Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Ifigned
,
SUMMARY Inspection on May 2-4, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 20 inspector hours onsite in the areas of Construction Deficiency Reports, noncompliances, equipment storage and plant status review.
Results Of the four areas inspected, no apparent itws of Nncompliance or deviation were identified.
790727 0 3 gp I: n r, 289 s
- J
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Coctacted Licensee Employees
- C. W. Grier, Project Engineer
- K. S. Kisida, QA Engineer
- D. C. Leslie, Assistant Mechanical QA Engineer
- G. A. Copp, Nuclear Engineer
- L. J. Bare, Assistant Engineer Licensing
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 4, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above. The status of various
'-sn items was discussed. Additional information was requested to supplement the licensee's response to Licensee Identified Item 369/79-22-01.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
,
(Open) Deficiency 369/79-14-03, Cable 1 * NC 752 lead reversal at transmitter INCFT5050. The licensee's April 12, 1979 response to RII advised that all safety-related terminal blocks inside containment were being replaced by environmentally sealed splices. This work was stopped pending review and revision of procedure M-41B Serial No. 15, Inspection Instruction for Terminations. This item remains open pending review of the splicing operations.
(Closed) Infraction 369/79-15-01, Failure to follow procedures for instrumentation manifold valve instal'ttion.
The inspector reviewed the inspection records for the isolatAon and manifold valves on func-tionally safety-related instrument loops. These records were referenced in DPC's March 12, 1979 response to Rll. The closed NCR (7723) for the four isolation valves which were found to contain the incorrect number of diaphrams and the four indicated valves vere examined.
(Closed) Infraction 370/78-18-01, Weld rod control-failure to follow precedures. The inspection reviewed NCR 8235 dated February 1,1979 wb;ch was written to cover some uncontrolled welding material. The closure of this NCR included certification that the personnel in the area were reinstructed in the control of welding material. A tour of the reactor and auxiliary buildings indicated that in the areas examined, welding material control appears adequate and the actions listed in DPC's February 19, 1979 response to RII have been implemented.
?; ') U A]0
.
.
.
-2-(Closed) Infraction 370/78-14-04 Failure to follow pipe Cleanliness Procedure. The inspector toured the Unit 2 reactor building to check for unprotected pipe openings. The records documenting the reinstruc-tion of craft personnel and QC inspectors as reported in DPC's December 6, 1978 response to RII were reviewed. The joint (ISO-MCF1-2MC2) has been welded, radiographed and accepted.
(Closed) Unresolved Iters 369/79-12-01, Improper storage of safety-related HEPA filters. The inspector examined the storage conditions in warehouse # 1.
These filters are now stored in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.
(0 pen) Infraction 369/79-25-02, Lack of documented procedure for Main Steam Safety Valve Assembly - The licensee's response to RII dated April 18, 1979 advised that NCR #8394 had been written to document the corrective action.
Review of this NCR revealed that only instructions to use the controlled manufacturer's assembly =>Lual was addressed.
No completion date was 3 ven for the correct assembly of these valves.
i Inspection of these valves was made and no corrective action has been taken. DPC was instructed to submit additional information which thould reflect when the valves will be reassemblied properly, what inspection will be performed and when the valves will be calibrated.
4.
Unresolved Items P
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Licensee Identified Items (LII) (10 CFR 50.55 (e)
(Open) LII 369/79-22-01, Pressurizer Power Operated Relief Valves.
The licensee notified RII that during pre-op testing of Unit 1, the 3 pressurizer power operated relief valves did not operate properly.
The licensee's report was submitted to RII April 13, 1979. The new parts have not yet been received.
(Open) LII 369/79-22-02 Pipe hanger Deficicacies - The licensee reported April 11, 1979 that a QA audit of QC accepted pipehangers had determined that all acceptance criteria had not been satisfied.
DPC's report is due May 11, 1979.
(Open) LII 369/79-22-03 Loose parts on a 400HP RHR pump motor.
DPC advised RII on April 23, 1979 that a 400HP RHR pump motor was found to have loose " fingers". DPC's report is due May 23, 1979.
(Open) LII 369/79-22-04,370/79-11-01 Improper Insulation on Elec-trical leads. Duke Power Company's repsonse dated January 4,1979 indicated the deficient coils would be replaced with qualified coils.
The inspector reviewed the list that identified the valves requiring replacement coils and those that have been replaced. A few of those coils identified have not yet been replaced.
79l
,mn c
s
-
.
-3-
.
.
6.
Independent Inspection Effort A.
Plant Inspection The inspector examined several areas of Units 1 & 2 to review the The in-place storage of equipment and cleanliness conditions.
licensee was in the process of a cosplete cleanup of Unit I reactor building. The electrical cabinets for Unit I were closed The licensee except for those in which work was being performed.
has an on going clean up program in Unit 2.
B.
Unit 2 Construction Status It was noted that the Unit 2 auxiliary feedwater pumps were being removed. DPC advised that they were shipping the two pumps and motors to another site. The licensee was requested to advise RII of any change in the completion date of Unit 2 as a result of this pump removal.
Within the areas examined, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.-
e liI wW
- -
S
../J L/L