IR 05000361/1981017

IE Insp Rept 50-361/81-17 on 810715-31.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Test Program & Procedures,Maint,Plant Tours & Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items

ML20030E240
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	08/21/1981
From:	Johnston G, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20030E238	List: IR 05000361/1981017 ML20030E237
References
50-361-81-17, NUDOCS 8109180250
Download: ML20030E240 (3)

Text

.

.

..

,

_ ;

_

,

.-

,

.

.

.

,

,

,

"

.

, _

,

,

-

[

U.S. N CLEAR REGULATORY COPEISSION OFFICE OF~ INSPECTION AND ENFORCEM.ENT.

_

-

~ REGION V

'

Report No. 50-361/81-17

.

Docket No. SC-361 Licensee: Southern California Edison Company P,O. Rox 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770,

Facility Name: San Onofre Unit 2 Inspection at:

San Onofre, California Inspection conducted: July 15 - 31, 1981 Inspector:

b4.2 /, /N LGar) Johnstod,1, Resident Inspector DWte Sfgned Approved By:

b8),21, j W/

G1 ZwetW g, CU ef, Reactor Projects DatF Sighed Section 1, Reactor Operations Projects Branch Summary:

Inspection on July 15 to July 31, 1981 (Report No. 50-361/81-18)

Areas Inspected:

Routine, resident inspection of preoperational test pro 5 ram and procedures, maintenance, plant tours, licensee actions on inspector-identified items, and independent inspection effort. The inspection involved 80 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.

Results: Of the five areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.

.

"

RV Form 219 (2)

5109180250 810824

'

'

PDR ADOCK 05000361 G

PDR

,

.1

.

.

(

.

.. s 7.-

.,

,

7;l-

~

,4

,:-

,

.

,

,

,4T

^

'

+

,

.

,

,

- v

w

~

.

.-

_

s

-

-

'

' ' _

DETAILSkj}_,

'

-

L

.

'

1.

Persons Contacted

'~i 't

-

,.

,

,,

_

s.

x.

.

a.

Southern California' Edison Company (SCE)J

• C. R. Horton, Startup Quality Assurark:e Supervisor

• P. A. Croy, Site Project saality As'urance Supervisor s

J. J. Pantaleo, Startup Quality Assurance Engineer

W. M. Schwab, Unit 3 Startup Supervisor

K. A. Slagel, Startup Management Supervisor

R. Gray, Startup Maintenance Supervisor K. Johnson, Engineer A. Martel, Engineer A. Neill, Engineer T. Gray, Quality Assurance Engineer D. Stonecipher, Operations-Quality Assurance Supervisor b.

Bechtel Power Corporation-

• L. W. Hurst, Project Quality Assurance Manager In addition, operatint personnel, craftsmen and engineers were also contacted-during the course of.the inspection.

• Denotes attendees of Management tieeting on July. 31,1981.

2.

Plant Status The licensee reported that Unit 2 construction was 99 percent complete as of July 29, 1981.

!

3.

Preoperational Test Observation Selected portions of the followir.g tests conducted under the Preoperational Test Program were observed by the inspector, a.

Diesel Generator Load Sequencing - 2PE-472-03.

b.

Main Steam System Valves and Traps (Valve closure time for main steam isolation valves) - 2PE-350-01.

c.

High_ Pressure Safety Injection - 2PE-225-01.

'

l During the conduct of the tests, the inspector observed that the personnel conducting the tests were using the latest revision of the test procedure and were following the procedure. The inspector also verified by observation that the test prerequisites were met; that proptr lineup of plant systems required for the test were complete; and that test equipment was calibrated and in service prior to comencement of the test.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

,

5-P 4__,

<%

I,

3

,

!

.

.

.

<

.

.-

2-4.

Maintenance The inspector examined records of maintenance activities performed on equipment turned over to_ the startup organization to verify that regular preventive maintenance was being perfomed and documented. The inspector also discussed the turnover of~ maintenance activities to the station operations mainte%)ce organization. The inspector emphasized that prior to fuel load the; maintenance being perfonned should _ conform to the operations maintenance program..

No items of noncompliance or ' deviations were identified.

.

.

-

5.

Plant Tour

.

The inspector toured Unit 2 several ti.nes during the report period. During these tours, the inspector directed attention toward housekeeping, equipment preservation, maintenance-activities, and work on completed systems. During a tour of the containment, the inspector observed that reactor vessel studs stored vertically on a support stand h W the threaded portions covered only with very lightweight polyethylene plastic sheeting. The following day, the inspector noted that the studs were covered with a more suitable heavy rubberized canvas material. During the management meeting, the inspector expressed the concern that greater attention be paid to the condition of equipment and the use of adequate protective measures.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Finding The inspector examined the action taken by the licensee on a previously inspector-identified concern.

(Closed) Followup Item (50-361/81-09/2). The licensee'was requested to provide a means to assure that permanent plant instrumentation used for preoperational test acceptance criteria is in calibration prior to use in such tests.

In response to this request, the licensee has agreed to conduct a three point calibration, within 30 days of the performance of a preoperational test, on all permanent plant instrumentation to be used in that 30-day period prior to the test, the Startup Engineer will initiate a Test Exception Report to resolve the question of the acceptability of the test data received from that instrumentation.

(01 50-361/81-17-01)

7.

Management Interview On July 31, 1981, the inspector met with licensee representatives (identified in Paragraph 1) to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection.