IR 05000361/1981010
| ML20004C006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1981 |
| From: | Thomas Young, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004C004 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-81-10, NUDOCS 8106010400 | |
| Download: ML20004C006 (3) | |
Text
'
,
U. S. !iUCLEAR RECUIATORY CC tMISSIO t OFFICE OF I! SPECTIC:I A!!D E!;TORCE.#.:.!TT RECIO:I V R2 port l'c..
50-361/81-10
-
Do'cket !!o.
50-361 License tio.
CPPR-97 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 San Onofre Unit 2 Facility :Tane: _
-
Inspection at:
San Dieco County, California Inspe. tion conducted: May 11-14, 1981 O
,
,
Inspectors:
A/
',
c2d/8/
T. Young.Jr., Wactor losliect#/
/ Dap signed V
()
V
... =
,
.
-
.... _
,
Data Signed
,
Date Signed
.
Approved By:
fik E
N
'
'
G.Gwet{g, Aeging Chief, Reactor Projects Sec. 2
'Date Signed
~
Reactor operations Project Branch
- Suc=ary:
,
,
Insoection on May 11-14,1981 (Report No. 50-361/81-101
~ ~ -
,.j,..
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee's preoperational
":-
test program implementation, emergency procedures, preoperational test program records, preoperational test procedure review and independent inspection effort..
The inspection involved 24 inspector-hours on-site by cne NRC inspector.-
.i.t.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified'.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-. - - -
.
,
,,,,
s
& %*
'
..
.
...
-......
..
,,RVForm219(2[... '..,..
'
,,,
)
,,
.
,
.
-810 6 0.1 o YOO
-
I.Y'i_IS.T.:-A-7s
"
-
.
..
-.. -
.
..
"
'
'
....
..
. _._._.
., - - -,,,
,.,
- -., -
,
e
,
,e-
- - -,
p,
.--,.-v--..
,,.,,y
.
.
...
.
_. _ __
_ _
_ _ _
_
-
,
.
DETAIL.S 1.
Persons Contacted
- D. E. Nunn, QA Manager
- G. A. Chavez, Project Startup Supervisor
- P. A. Croy, Site Project OA Supervisor
-
- D. Stonecipher, Operations QA Supervisor
- C. R. Horton, Startup QA Supervisor
R. M. Rosenblum, Startup Engineering Supervisor
- M. Z. Menlo, Startup Engineering Supervisor
- J. J. -Pantaleo, Startup QA Engineer J. Tate, Operations Engineer
- V. B. Fisher, Operations Engineer
,
In addition, construction and maintenance craftsmen, engineers, and foremen were contacted during the inspection.
- Cenotes attendees at management meeting on April 16, 1981.
2.
Preoperational Test Program Implementation The inspector ascertained by discussions with the Project Startup Supervisor, other startup personnel and a review of procedures and startup records that the Preoperational Test Program has been implemented in accordancs with the commitments made in the FSAR. The following areas were examined:
a.
Document Control b.
Design Changes and Modifications l
c.
Klintenance during Preaperational Testing No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Preoperational Test Records The inspector verified that the Startup Program Manual established administrative controls for maintaining all records, and assigned responsibilities to assure all records are maintained. Also record storage and retention periods have been established. The inspector ascertained that the overall program has been implemented and is ongoing.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
- ~*
-w-,-e
-,.4--,3-,,-,.
,w
,-,-,,--p,-,,.--,,-.-.-,
...--e.
-.
_,_,w-,w f w.g g-m, c,ri4,,-
p,,..vwe
-' Mew--- e v v*w'"#-ew-w - v wv 1Tyv w%
e--w'r=v----ww=e-wT==-ev-=~www*
__-
--
.
..
-
_
-
,
' '
,.
2-
-
4.
Emergency Procedures for Coping with ATWS Events (TI2515/46)
Operating Instruction No. S023-3-5.1, Emergency Plant Shutdown was examined and found to meet all of the acceptance criteria of the above Temporary Instruction. Revision 2 was still in draft form but it has been tested on a simulator and reviewed by NRR.
No items of noncompliacce or deviations were identified.
5.
Emergency Procedure for Going to Cold Shutdown w/o Letdown Operating Instruction No. S023-3-5.21 Malfunction of Reactor Coolant Letdown / Purification system was examined. The procedure appeo,s to be adequate for achieving cold shutdown of the plant without the use of letdown.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
'
6.
Emergency Procedures
'
An index of the plant emergency procedures was reviewed for completeness.
The index was compared to the list of Paragraph 6. Appendix A. RG 1.33.
The procedure for " Fire in the Control Room or Forced Evacuation of Control Room" had not been written at the time of the inspection.
The licensee comitted to writing the required procedure (81-10-01).
The inspector informed the licensee of another expected transient i
proc 2 dure which may be applicable, " Waste Gas Systen, failure",
an analyzed accident in the FSAR. A licensee representative stated at the exit interview that a determination would be made if such a procedure is needed and the inspector would be informed during a subsequent inspection (81-10-02).
No items of noncompliance or dcplations were identified.
7.
Management Interview l
The inspector met with the licensee representatives identified in
'
Paragraph 1 on May 14,1981 to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection.
,
-en--------a
. -,,,. -.,
,a-n.--
,-
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - -.
-
-