IR 05000361/1981008
| ML19345H557 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/23/1981 |
| From: | Carlson J, Thomas Young, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345H554 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-81-08, 50-361-81-8, NUDOCS 8105210256 | |
| Download: ML19345H557 (3) | |
Text
'.
.
U. S. tiUCLEAR RECUL\\ TORY C0!ci1SSIO:t 0FFICE OF I!iSPECTIO!! AID EiFORCE!{E!iT REGIOi V R2 port lio. 50-361/81-08
-
Docket tio. 50-361 License rio. CPPR-97 safeguards croup Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead California 91770 Facility :Ta=c: San Onofre Unit 2 Inspection at: San Dieoo County, California Inspection condu ed: Apri,1 13-16, 1981
,
T. Young r,,RepYorI cto
'/ D t,6 Signed fy l
'
--
(,
J. Carlson, Reactor Inspector Date signed
'
-
( \\
Date Signed A3 &(
Approved By:
_ /
_
,
.
deGLion c D' ate Signed
,
u. twetzig, Acting i.,nieg KeafLor VroJeGL5 _
.,
,
-
Reactor Operations Projects Branch Suc=ary:
Inspection on Acril 13-16,1981 (hteport No. 50-361/81-08)
~'
~
..,.
.
..
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee's preoperational test program implementation, evaluai. ion of test results, preoperational test
,,
procedure verification, preoperational test procedure review and independent inspection effort. The inspection involved 50 inspection-hours on-site by two NRC inspectors.
-
Resul ts_: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
.
- %.
-
,
,
-
-
. -..
.
..
.,,, RV Fo rm 219 (2)
.
,,.
.. ; ;;,;.
...-
.
.
'
'
-
U'I.7: " '"?
-
"
810 5 210)F(,
q
.. _...
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted H. E. Morgan, Unit 2 Station Superintendent
- G. A. Chavez, Project Startup Supervisor
- P. A. Croy, Site Project QA Supervisor D. Stonecipher, Operations QA Supervisor C. R. Horton, Startup QA Supervisor
- R. M. Rosenblum, Startup Engineering Supervisor
- M. Z. Menlo, Startup Engineering Supervisor
- J. J. Pantaleo, Startup QA Engineer J. K. Huey, Startup QA Engineer J. Tate, Operations Engineer H. L. Fryer, Senior Design Engineer
- T. Garven, Operations OA Engineer In addition, construction and maintenance craftsmen, engineers, and foremen were contacted during the inspection.
- Denotes attendees at management meeting on April 16, 1981.
2.
Preoperational Test Procedure Verification The inspectors verified that the preoperational test program adequately addressed all flRC requirements and the licensee comitments in the FSAR.
The inspectors verified that 90% of the Preoperational Test Procedures committed to in the FSAR and referenced in RG 1.68 have been written, reviewed and approved. The other 10% have been written in draft form and are in various stages of review and approval.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Preoperational Test Program Implementation The inspectors ascertained by discussions with the Project Startup Supervisor, other startup personnel and a review of procedures and startup records that the Preoperational Test Program has been implemented in accordance
,
with the comitments made in the FSAR. The following areas were examined:
l a.
Test Program l
b.
Test Organization c.
Test Program Administration
'
d.
Document Control e.
Equipment Protection and Cleanliness f.
Test and Measurement Equipnent g.
Training No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
i
,
.
-
_ _.
-
_.
-
- _.
'
.
.
2-
-
4.
Evaluation of Test Results The inspector reviewed the results of the Main Steam System Safety Valve setpoint test. The review consisted of a detailed comparison of the test procedure and the FSAR comittments. Calculations were checked for accuracy, and confomance to the Startup and Test Manual for the conduct of testing was verified.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Preoperational Test Procedure Review - RPS The inspector reviewed the licensee's test procedure 2PE-350-01, Rev. 0 -
Main Steam System Valves and Traps. Specific attention was focused on testing of the Main Steam Safety Valves and the Main Steam Isolation Valves. The inspector verified that the procedure was approved by the applicable supervisor, the Test Working Group (TWG) and the startup Q. A. organization. The format of the procedure was in conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.68 - Initial Test Programs for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants. Specific testing comittments for the above noted valves l
in the FSAR were verified by the inspector to be covered in the test procedure.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
6.
Independent Inspection Effort
,
i The inspectors held discussions with the plant superintendent and a senior design engineer on the tracking systems for Task Action Plan items from HUREG 0737. The licensee representatives were informed that 18E must inspect these items upon their completion.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Manacement Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives identified in Paragraph 1 on April 16, 1981 to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection.
l
{
l
' " ' ' -
w'
'm
--
w-
-
rT r
w
,,,-