IR 05000361/1981018
| ML20030E234 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1981 |
| From: | Andrea Johnson, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030E232 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-81-18, NUDOCS 8109180243 | |
| Download: ML20030E234 (3) | |
Text
~
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION V
Report No. 50/81-18 Docket No. 50-361 License No.
CPPR-97 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walrut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Name:
San Onofre Unit No. 2 Inspection at:
San Diego Count _y, California Inspection conducted:
August 10-14, 1981 Inspectors :
(l [ta p
-
AJ
/
"A.D. Johnso_n, Director, Enforcement and
/
Date Signed Investigations ()
Date Signed Date Signed Approved By:
[([M/f/
GV B. Gwetzif. I;hief, Reactor Projects
'Date Signed
'
Section 1, Reactor Operations Summary:
Ir.spection on August 10 thru 14, 1961 (Report No. 50-361/81-18)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unanr.ounced inspection of Preoperation test results, ir.aintenance QA program, followup on IE Bulletins, Circulars and previously inspector identified concerns. The inspection involved 32 onsite inspection hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: Of the five areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
<
.
3109180243 810826
' DR ADOCK 05000
"
RV Fonn 219 (2)
-
.
O'
1.
Persons Contacted
- J. M. Curran, QA Manager G. A. Chavez, Project Startup Supervisor
- v. J. Pantaleo, Startup QA Engineer
- M. Z. Merlo, Stat lup Engineering Supervisor
- Denotes those attending exit interview.
2.
Preoperational Test Results.
The inspector examined the records for the below listed preopera-tional tests. The tests had been performed and the results approved in accordance with the requirements of the licensee's Startup Quality Assurance. Program. The documentation examined inc'uded, as appropriate, test change notices; test exception reports, startup work permits; noncorformance reports; and the test log, data and results. The test data and results were compared to the pertinent design data and requirements described in the FSAR.
2AC-211-03 - Pressurize pressure and level control 2PE-223-04 - Volume control tank 2AC-509-01 - Heat exchanger and A.C. Rooms HVAC 2AC-356-01 - Reactor Regulations System 2PE-504-03 - Hydrogen Recombiner 2PE-502-01 - Containment Dome Circulating Fans 2AC-110-12 - New Fuel Handling Crane 2PE-313-02 - Pressurizer Safety Valve 2AC-223-07 - Boronometer Electronics 2PE-202-01 - Containment Spray Dry Pipe Air Flow test 2PE-101-03 - Primary Containment Structural Integrity test 2AC-235-02 - Auxiliary Feedwater Chemical Feed System
,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Followup on IE Bulletins,~ Circulars <and Previous Adverse Inspector Findings.
- The inspector examined-the-licensee QA recor'ds and r lated documen-tation concerning the following listed items. 'The inspector also confirmed from the examination and, discussions with licensee repre-sentatives that appropriate' actions relating.to,the items had been taken by the licensee.
" '
.
49V-.
,
!
M
$
s
- e L-
.
.
-
.
-
.
-
. -
..
.
-..
..
.
d-2-IE Bulletin 79-21 IE Bulletin 80-11 IE Bulletin 81-01 IE Circular 79-02 IE Circular 80-11 IE Circular 81-01 IE Circular 81-02 IE Circular 81-03 IE Circular 81-06 IE Circular 81-08 Previous adverse inspector findings: 79-1401, 80-1102, 80-1601, 80-1602, 80-1604, 80-1701, 80-1702, 80-2102, 81-0102, 81-0303, 81-0902.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
QA Maintenance Procedures.
The inspector was informed that the procedure to control the
" General Maintenance Order" had not been completed. According to the responsible licensee representative, the procedure would be completed ard submitted to the on-site review committee in the immediate future, the inspector commented,that this procedure was considered to be a vital ' element fo'r appropriate control of mainte-nance activities and, therefore, will-be examined by an IE inspector prior to NRC licensing.of the plant.
- Exit Interview.
$'.
The inspector met with the indiVduals id ntified in paragraph 1 of this report on August'14, 1981.,The scope and. fin' ding's of the inspection were discussed. Sincenoiitemofnoncomplianceor deviations were identified, no commitments vere made by the licensee representatives.
'
,,
,
s
.
,
>
k i
!
l
!
l i
!
-.
,
-. -
- -
-
.. -... - - -.
.
..
-... _ -.. -
., -
,,, -