IR 05000206/1981028
| ML20031H453 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1981 |
| From: | Mcqueen A, Schaefer D, Schuster M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031H438 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-206-81-28, NUDOCS 8110270494 | |
| Download: ML20031H453 (2) | |
Text
r
-
.
.
.
The information on this page is considered to be arpropriate
,
for public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790.
U.S. NUCLEAR riGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region V Report flo. 50-206/81-28(IE-V-,56)
Docket No. 50-206 License No.
DPR-13 Safeguards Group II Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead. California 91770
_
!
Facility Name:
San Onofre Nuclear Generati g Station, Unit 1 Inspection at: _Ga s Pendleton, California Inspection ConducteJ: September 14-18. 1981 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection Visit:
April 27 - May 1 and May 18-22, 1981 Type of Inspection:
Routine Unannounced Physical Protection
/p//h/g/
Inspectors-
.vu <-
Er.'W. Schaefer( Physical Protection Inspector
./ Date Signed W ~h W
/o/a///
\\
A.'D.Mc(ueen,PgsicalProtectionInspector
/ Date Signed
- '
~
Date Signed Approved by-W fo y,[/
i.D.Sciusterdhief,PhysicalSecuritySection
/ Dat( signed
'/
Inspection hmmary:
Areas ' inspected:
Included a review of Security Plan and Procedures; Security Organization - Management; Security Organization - Personnel; Security Organization - Response; Records and Reports; Testing and' Maintenance; Locks, Keys and Combinations; Security System Power Supply; Lighting; Access Control - Personnol; Access Control - Packages; Access Control - Vehicles; Detection Aids - Protected Area; Detection Aids - Vital Area; Follow up Items on Previous Inspections; and Independent Effort. The inspection involved 98 inspector hours by two NRC inspectors. The inspection was begun during regular hours; 30 inspection hours were accomplished during off shift periods.
Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the sixteen arets examined during the inspection.
8110270494 811016 PDR ADOCK 05000206 G
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _
-
.
.
.
.
DETAILS Persons Contacted 10 CFR 2.700 INFORMATION 1.
J. Anaya, Supervisor, Plant Instrumentation, Unit 1 L. Bates Supervising Security Officer, Unit 1 L. Baugher, Records Custodian, Corporate Document Center
- R. Bonnet, Security Supervisor, Unit 1
- F. Briggs, Compliance Engineer, SONGS pi F. Bucelli, Supervising Security Officer, Unit 1 33 ( il, M, M G. Buzard, Area Communication Technician, SONGS
/
d M. Cochran, Access Control Officer, SONGS copy y--
com
- J. Curran, Manager, Quality Assurance, SCE Mpp L. Gaspar, M.D., Atlantic Nuclear Services, Inc.
- E. Cault, Compliance Department, SCE Tms DocWENT 15 NOT To as M. Goodwin, R.N., Atlantic Nuclear Services, Inc. nznm.'uo wmfDUT SPECIFIC
- K. Hadley, Supervisor, Station. Security, SONGS U? TOV /d OF IEN
- G.'Hammond, Nuclear Engineer, SCE
- J. Haynes, Manager, Nuclear Operations SCE J. Hobbs, Security Computer Prog.ammer, Unit 1 E. Huffstutler, Alarm / Key Control Officer, SONGS C. Johnson, Test Technician, Instrumentation Department, Unit 1 W. Jones, Maintenance Planner, Unit 1
- B. Katz, Assistant Station Manager, Technical, SONGS R. Kelly, Nuclear Computer Technician, Unit 1 H. Key, Quality Assurance Engineer, Unit 1 R. Lemien, Supervising Security Officer, Unit 1
- G. Mcdonald, Supervisor, QA/QC, Unit 1 J. Pressney, Test Technician, Instrumentation Department, Unit 1 P. Rankin, Budget and Controls Supervisor, SONGS
- H. Ray, Station Manager, SONGS G. Robinson, Security Supervisor, Unit 2 J. Summy, Computer Maintenance Foreman, SONGS P. Talley, Security Training Officer, SONGS The inspectors also interviewed other members of the security organization and technical staff during the course of this inspection.
- Denotes those present at the September 18, 1981 exit. interview.
'
2.
Licensee's Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Noncompliance (80-29-02).
Maintenance on non-operational alarm zones was not accomplished as soon as,possible. The inspectors determined that work orders for non-operational. alarm zones were receiving adequate priority. See paragraph 10.
10 CFR 2.790 INFORMATION.
- - _ -
.
.
. _.
.
- -
-..
..- - -.
.
-
- -.