IR 05000348/1979043
| ML19263F416 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1979 |
| From: | Bryant J, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19263F391 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-43, 50-364-79-21, NUDOCS 8001280179 | |
| Download: ML19263F416 (4) | |
Text
'
.
.
.
/
'o UNITED STATES
~,,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Ag E
REGION 11 o
$
' i
., #
o 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 Y
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 g,****9 o
DEC 311979
Report Nos. 50-348/79-43 and 50-364/79-21 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Avenue Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Facility Name: Farley Nuclear Plant Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos. NPF-2 and CPPR-86 Inspection at Farley site near Ashford, Alabama Inspector:
M
/ 2-f c
,
Date Signed M. 1).' Hunt
///
Approved by:
%M
~
/J/Z.f/7C/
ryant, A p g Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed J.
SUMMARY Inspection on December 5-7, 1979 This routine unannounced inspection involved 16 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of ASME certifications, QA mechanical audits, CDR's, IIR's, unresolved items and inspector followup items.
Results Of the seven areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
1817 096 8001280 g cq
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- R. E. Hollands, QA Supervisor
- J. G. Hegi, Project QC Engineer
- D. E. Mansfield, Startup Superir. wndent (Production)
- J. A. Mooney, Project Manager
- C. R. Kualheim, QA Engineer
- J. C. Payson, QA Engineer
- D.
B. Hartline, QA Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included four construction craftsme'1, three technicians, four security force members, and five office persarinel.
Other Organizations
- L. F. Warrick, Project Manager, Daniel Construction Company of Ale.bama (DCCA)
- L. C. Easterwood, QC Manager, DCCA
- W. H. Bradford
- Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit ' Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on December 7, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Open) Unresolved Item 348/79-10-1, Emergency escape hatch access. The licensee has referred this item to their AE for study and evaluation.
4.
Unresolved Items
.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Licensee Identified Items [10 CFR 50.55(e)]
jgjJ Qg/
(0;.n) 364/79-21-01 Class III valves installed in Class II system. The licensee is evaluating this item to determine if it is reportable. Discussions with licensee personnel revealed that other NRC requested information (IE Bulletins & Circulars) has created a backlog of work for their consultants, and therefore, they requested an extension on the reporting tim.
..
.
'
-2-6.
Inspector Followup Items (IFI)
(Open) IFI, 364/79-16-01, Fire seal penetration procedure. The licensee had just issued revision 6 to QCP 5.5.3.1, Penetration Seal Installation and Inspection. The revision provides a method for controlling the pene-tration of previously inspected and accepted fire seals. The inspector will review this item at a later date.
(0 pen) IFI 348/79-38-01, Deficient fire seals. The inspector discussed this item with the plant manager of the operating unit who advised that a QA audit had been conducted just prior to the concern expressed by an employee. The results of that audit revealed some other fire seals that appeared to be deficient under the new fire wall rating requirements. The inspector reviewed the records for the repair / modifications and QC accep-tance of ten fire seals. This work is to continue after a definite method for control of penetrated fire seals in developed that will provide control of the penetrations during modification to the fire control systems.
.
(Closed) IFI 343/79-38-02, Transfer of discrepancies to the operating staff. The inspector reviewed the procedures and notices that have been developed to provide for the exchange of Unit 2 employee concerns about Unit 1 to the proper personnel. RII has no further concerns at this time.
(Closed) IFI 364/79-06-02, Followup of QC/QA inspector findings. The inspector examined areas of the plant which QC reported as deficient. All had been resolved.
It appears that as items are reported, corrective action is being taken. RII Fas no further questions at this time.
7.
Licensee Event Report (LER)
(Open) LER 348/79-43-01, Deficient fire seals. The licensee submitted this item on December 7, 1979, and will handle it as a 30 day report.
.
8.
Compliance with ASME Certification The inspector reviewed the ASME certification with representatives of DCCA. Work at the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant Project is governed by the 1971 edition of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code including Addenda through Summer 1971, and includes:
a.
Field fabrication of Code Classes 1, 2, and 3 piping subassemblies and MC penetration assemblies.
b.
Field installation of Code Classes 1, 2, and 3 components, piping
'
subassemblies, appurtenances, penetration assemblies and parts.
Daniel Construction Company holds the Certificates of Authorization Numbers N-686-1 for the NA Symbol and N-687-1 for the NPT Symbol. The Statement of Authority Revision 6 dated February 28, 1977, assigns responsibility for implementing the requirements to the managers and individuals identified in the QA Manual for Nuclear Construction.
1817 098;
.
.
.
.
.
-3-The DCCA QA program is patterned along the lines of the ASME requirements wherein each requirement is addressed either by a QA or a QC procedure.
The DCCA corporate office conducts audits of the site QA organization.
They also perform audits of the ASME site organization and functions as pre-ASME audits. An ASME survey was conducted early in 1979 prior to the certification renewal.
9.
QA Aedits The inspector reviewed the results of three QA mechanical audits. The audits were conducted to determine that QC procedures were being followed in the areas of 1.) pipefitter welder qualifications (November 16, 1979),
2.) storage of piping materials (November 2,1979), and 3.)
einstallation QC acceptance of piping materials (October 22, 1979). The audit outlines had been prepared to review the various requirements e f the procedures relating to the storage of welder test records, pipe cleaning, certification of NDE personnel and included review of handlinF and cutting of stainless steel pipe.
Within the areas examined, no items of noncompliance were identified.
10.
Independent Inspection The inspector examined various levels of the auxiliary building for control of construction debris and equipment protection. Now that the construction activities have increased, more effort has been placed in housekeeping efforts.
Within the area examined, no items of noncompliance were identified.
.
1817 099