IR 05000348/1979038
| ML19269F431 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/28/1979 |
| From: | Conlon T, Gibbons T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269F423 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-38, 50-364-79-18, NUDOCS 7912210021 | |
| Download: ML19269F431 (4) | |
Text
.
.
/
'o UNITED STATES
!
I,,o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION sE REGION 11
$
-
'*
o
.
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUtTE 3100
%,*****,f ATLANTA, GEORGIA 79303 NOV 2 91979 Report Nos. 50-34/79-38 and 50-364/79-18 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Facility Name: Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos. N?F-2 and CPPR-86 Inspection at Farley site near Dothan, Alabama Inspector:
[k
'
i~ ""
r(
'
- Date Signed T. D. Gibbons Accompatying Personnel:
N. Merriweather Approved by:c Y M
M
//- Z F'- 7 7 T. E. Conloa, Section Chief, RC&ES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on November 6-9, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 58 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of electrical cable and termirations work and work activities, and employee concerns Results Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
2166 071 2 91221o W
/
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. A. Mooney, Project Manager, Construction
- W. G. Hairston, Plant Manager
- R. E. Hollands, QA Supervisor, Construction
- W. B. Shipman, Maintenance Superintendent, Power
- C. R. Kualheim, QA Engineer, Construction Other contractor employees contacted included ten construction craftsmen.
Other Organizations
- L. C. Easterwood, QC Manager, Daniel Construction
- L. F. Warrick, Project Manager, Daniel Construction
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 9, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee. Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations. New resolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 7.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (Unit 2).
The inspector conducted a walk-through inspection examining electrical equipment and raceways in the containment, auxiliary building.
Specifically, safety-related flow transmitters 424, 425 and 426 were also examined for separation and protection. Within the areas examined, no items of noncom-pliance or deviations were identified.
2166 07:2
-
,
l
/
-2-
.
6.
Electrical (Cables and Terminations II) - Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 2).
The safety-related power and control cables identified below were selected for inspection.
Power Control 2VBEE16P 2VADF03C 2VBDG03P 2VBL5002A 2VADF10P 2VBL5003A 2VBEE16Q 2VBL5004A 2VBDG10F 2VADF112 2 VAL 2Cl-A 2'IBDG102 2 VAL 2C02A 2VADF11B The cables identified above were inspected to assure that the requirements of the Quality Control Procedure 5.4.3.1 for cable installation were being compiled with in the areas of drawing / procedure control, location, routing, protection, separation, grounding, bonding of raceways, race.oy identifica-tion, minimum cable bend radius and cable pulling.
Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Employee Concerns (Unit 1)
An electrician contacted this inspector and a licensee representative about a possiole radiation exposure.
The licensee arranged a briefing for the employee and his partner with the licensee supervisor of health physics.
The supervisor of health physics was able to completely satisfy the employ-ees' concerns.
A second electrician contacted this inspector and a licensee representative about a defective fire seal that he saw while working in Unit 1.
The licensee arranged for the employee and the NRC inspectors to enter Unit I with the maintenance supervisor to identify the specific fire seal identified by the employee. A fire seal 16-121-27 was found to have contracted, thereby allowing light to be observed. The concerned employee stated that a QC inspector observed the contracted seal and lad contacted Delcon elec-trical engineering. The QC inspector was contacted and he identified several additional fire seals which were breached and not rescaled. The maintenance supervisor of Unit I was not aware of the seal problem. The inspector identified the repair of the fire seals as an unresolved item.
The item will be identified in 348/79-38-01, Deficient Fire Seals.
The lack of a specific method of transferring discrepancies identified by the construction personnel to the operating plant staff. This will be an 2166 073
.
.
,
-3-
,
inspector followup item. This item will be identified by 348/79-38-02, Transfer of discrepancies to the operating staff.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.
2166 074