IR 05000348/1979025
| ML19207B259 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 07/05/1979 |
| From: | Ang W, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19207B257 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-25, NUDOCS 7908230684 | |
| Download: ML19207B259 (3) | |
Text
.
- pm Recoq'o, UNITED STATES
'
- '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,.,, gg'. L
,
- '
'l REGION 11 O-
101 MARIETTA sT., N.W., sulTE 3100 o,
[
ATLANT A, G EoRGI A 30303
%
be
.....
_
Report No. 50-348/79-25 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Facility Name:
Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 Docket No.50-34d License No. NPF -2 Inspection at er ev uclear Plant near Dothan, Alabama
]'k 7'[9f Inspect r:
W.P.Ag
- Date Signed Approved by:
2 f
[4[ /
7 ~[97 A. R.'Herdt, Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on June 20-22, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 19 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of concrete expansion anchor testing procedures, work activities and records.
Results Of the areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7008eso(oS~
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons cc : acted Licensee Employees
- W.d.Hairston,PlantManager
- W. B. Shipman, Maintenance Superintendent
- R. L. George, Engineering Supervisor
- J. A. Mooney, Project Manager, Construction
- R. D. Hill, Plant QA Engineer Other Organizations Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel)
C. S. Hsu, Mechanical Engineer
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 22, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The unresolved item noted in paragraph 5 was discussed and the licensee acknowledged the required action to resolve the item.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations.
A new unresolved item identified during this inspection is discussed in paragraph 5.
5.
Concrete Expansion Anchor Testing Procedures, Work Activities and Records -
Unit 1 Alabama Power Company (APCO) is in the process of inspecting, testing, analyzing, and repairing concrete expansion anchors utilized in safety related Seismic Category I piping systems as a result of IE Bulletin 79-02.
Inspection and test records for the following pipe hangers were reviewed for compliance with site inspection and test procedurer:
a.
RHR5-R38
-
A
' ' ' '
b.
SI-R37
,
-2-
,
c.
RHR-R103
-
d.
RHR-R106 e.
SI-R266 f.
SI-R34
'
g.
RHR6-R60 h.
SI-R67 i..CVCS-A21 Hangers RHR-R103, RHR-R106, and SI-R266 had been analyzed by Bechtel engineers and determined to require no repairs. Calculations and analysis records for those hangers were reviewed for compliance with the site pipe support analysis procedure. Hangers SI-R34, RHR6-R60, SI-R67, and CVCS-A21 had been analyzed by Bechtel and determined to require repairs. Calculations and analysis records for those hangers were reviewed for compliance with the site pipe support analysis procedure and the site pipe support repair procedure. Hangers SI-R67 and CVCS-A21 had been repaired and were visually inspected for compliance with their respective hanger repair notices and the site pipe support repair procedure. Hanger-SI-R67 and CVCS-A21 had not been repaired in accordance with their original hanger repair notices.
However, the licensee indicated that Becht,1 engineers had evaluated the condition and had authorized deviations from the original hanger repair notices. Records of calculations and 2 analysis for the resultant repaired condition were not available. Revisionr, to the hanger repair notices are recognized by the site pipe support repair procedure but recalculations and reenalysis of the revised hanger repair is not specif20G.
The licensee indicated that the site hanger repair procedure will be changed to require documentation of rece3culations and reanalysis of changes to all hanger repair notices.
All completed hanger repair work packages will be reviewed to assure documentation of recalculations and resnalysis for changes to the hanger ver:ir notices.
Pending completion of the above noted licensee action, this shall be identified as unresolved item 79-25-01, Revision of FNP-1-GMP-43, Repair of Piping Hangers in Safety Related System, to Require Recording of Recalculations for Changes to Hanger Repair Notices.
/
'
,
(
- *
,3