IR 05000348/1979015
| ML14099A139 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1979 |
| From: | Martin R, Wagner A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14099A138 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-15, 50-364-79-05, 50-364-79-5, NUDOCS 7906140157 | |
| Download: ML14099A139 (4) | |
Text
S R RGUNITED STATES S
'NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report No /79-15 and 050-364/79-05 Licensee:
Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Facility Name: Farley Unit 1 and 2 Docket No /79-15 and 50-364/79-05 License Nos. NPF-2 and CPPR-86 Inspection at Farle ite near Ashford, Alabama Inspector G. Wa ner Date Signed Approved by Mar in, Section Chief, NSS 1 Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on April 2 -
April 17, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 58 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of preoperational test procedure review for Unit 2, and test procedure review for modification to Unit I and refueling for Unit Results Of the three areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie /5 7
DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. Hairston, Plant Manager D. Poole, Operations Superintendent L. Ward, Startup Supervisor D. Mansfield, Startup Superintendent K. Burr, Test Director A. Fallow, Test Director S. Hall, Test Director R. Heisey, Test Director J. Greenwood, Test Director W. Shipman, Maintenance Superintendent Other Organizations Westinghouse
- B. Vandergrift, Refueling Coordinator G. Williams, Shift Supervisor J. Duvall, Shift Supervisor J. Moyers, Shift Engineer J. Bianchi, Core Physics Monitor N. Brennan, Core Physics Monitor
- R. Baulig, Shift Engineer N. Poyorzelski, Shift Engineer
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 7, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. There were no objections raised by the licensee regarding the finding.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio *
-2 Unit 1 Modification Testing Test Procedure 024-5-025 Unit 1 Sequences Modification Testing Preop, approved 3-26-79 was reviewed for conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.68 and Alan R. Barton letter file A-35.62.50 dated November 17, 197 No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
Unit 2 Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following test procedures were reviewed for conformance with Regulatory Guide 1.68, 1.6, 1.7, FSAR Section 9.34, 5.5, 8.3, 14.1.3 and the Precautions, Limiations and Setpoints documen Diesel Generator Load Sequencing Preop (Train A) approved 3-20-7 No Comment Diesel Generator Load Sequencing Preop (Train B), approved 3-13-7 No Comment Boric Acid System Preop, approved 8-24-7 No Comment CVCS Recycle System Preop, approved 11-20-7 No Comment CVC Letdown Preop, approved 7-13-7 The inspector pointed out that a procedural caution note found in one section of the test is applicable throughout the test. A test procedure modification was processed to make the note all inclusiv RCP Seal Injection and Changing Preop, approved 2-5-7 The inspector pointed out that a procedure caution note allows seal injection flow to go below minimum flow allowe A test procedure modification was processed to insert the correct valu During the review of Unit 2 preoperational test procedures the inspector noted that the test specifications required by Startup Standard 5 were issued for Unit I onl The licensee had previously identified this problem and was in the process of changing the standard. The change was
-3 approved to allow the use of the test specifications for Unit 1 and Unit The inspector reviewed the change and had no further question No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
Unit 1 Refueling Operations The inspector observed the refueling activities from the control room and from the containmen This inspection was made to determine compliance with Technical Specification During the review of the Fuel Assembly Handling Deviation Reports it was noted by the inspector that a single entry described a Gripper Alarm as sounding and preventing engagement. The entry stated that this had hap pened many time The Westinghouse coordinator stated at the exit that there is no known problem with the gripper alarm and a clarifying entry will be made to correct this problem. This item will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection (348/79-15-01). Plant Tour The inspector toured portions of Unit 1 and 2 control rooms, auxiliary buildings and reactor building During the tour of Unit 2 reactor building the inspector noted that the Safety Injection throttle valves were not tagged as required by FSAR question RSB-4-1. The required tags were subsequently manufactured and installed by the license No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.