IR 05000340/1979014
| ML19270G973 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley, 05000340  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1979 |
| From: | Herdt A, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19270G966 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-14, 50-364-79-06, 50-364-79-6, NUDOCS 7906220250 | |
| Download: ML19270G973 (4) | |
Text
.
.
,
UNITED STATES t * "80ug k
- ,p
,o,,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t.
REGION il
o
$
101 M ARIETTA STRE ET, N.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
%
/
,
.....
Report Nos. 50-348/79-14 and 50-364/79-00 Licensee: Alabama Power Company P. O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Facility Name:
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos. NPF-2 and CPPR-86 Inspection at Farley site near Ashford, Alabama 8/[2 7{
Inspector:
ll) /N {_,,m.
M. D. Hunt X)ats S(gned g
,
N'
[ [
'/,!' *[7f Approved by: A. R. Herdt, Section Chief, RC&ES Branch Date Signed _
SUMriARY Inspection on March 27-29, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine inspection involved 18 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of Unit 1 '.ER, Unit 2 QA Program, IE Bulletins and Circulars, equipment storage and housekeeping.
Results Of the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or devia-tions were identified in four areas; one apparent item of noncompliance was found in one area (Infraction - Failure to control superceded drawings -
paragraph 5).
2348 282 7906220250
-
.
.
.
L DETAILS 1.
Persons Contactod
.
Licensee Employees
- J. A. Mooney, Project Manager - Construction
- J. G. Hegi, Project QC Engineer
- R.
E. Hollands, Jr., QA Supervisor
- A. k. Hankins, QA Engineer
- D.
B. Hartline, QA Engineer
- J. C. Payson, QA Staf f Engineer
- R.
S. Fucich, QA Engineer C. R. Kualteim, QA Engineer W. G. Hairston, Unit 1 Plant Manager D. Morey, Unit 1 Maintenance Supervisor Other Organizations Daniel Construction Company of Alabama (DCCA)
- L. F. Warrick, Project Manager
- D. L. Garrison, QA Manager
- L. C. Easterwood, QA Manager
- Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 29, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above. The licensee was informed of the inspection follow up item 364/79-06-02 and noncompli-ance 364/79-06-01.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
2348 283
.
.
.
-2-5.
Independent Inspection Effort - Unit 2 a.
QA Program The inspector examined the interface of the licensee's QA program and the DCCA program. DCCA is the general contractor and has its own QA program which requires audits of the field operations by the corporate of fice. Audits of DCCA field operations are also performed by the licensee's QA organization.
DCCA has the respon-sibility for document control, record storage and purchase of certain materials designated by APCO.
Nonconformances and cor-rective actions are for the most part the responsibility of DCCA.
b.
Equipment Storage and Housekeeping The inspector examined several elevations of the Unit 2 reactor and auxiliary buildings.
During the inspection of the Electrical Penetration Room in the auxiliary building, several drawings were found laying on ductwork. The drawing numbers and revision levels were recorded.
Issue records at the document control center revealed that tne drawings found in the field were two revision levels behind the current revision. Drawings Nos. D 207459, Revision 14 and D 207452, Revision 12 were found in the electrical penetration room, while issue records indicate the current revision level was revision Revision 16 and 14 respectively. The inspector could find no indication that the drawings had been marked VOID as required by Field Quality Control Procedure (FQCP) 5.3.2.1, Section 5.3.2.
This appears to be an noncompliance and is identified as an infraction 364/79-06-01, Revised Drawing Control.
During the examination of the reactor building the inspector noted that pipe penetration No. 71 azmuth 227 degrees, elevation 133 feet was not covered.
A review of the QC/QA inspection logs revealed that this item had been identified.
.
Also, the RII inspector noted during the inspection that eight sample tubes had been disconnected and left open in the hot sample room (Room No. 2324 elevation 139 feet) in the auxiliary building.
This item had also been identified during the QC/QA surveillance.
RII will review the resolution of these items during a subsequent inspection. This review will be identified as inspector followup item 364/79-6-02, followup of QC/QA inspector findings.
6.
Licensee Event Reports (LER) Unit 1 (Open) LER 79-15 ECCS line linear surface indications.
2348 284
.
.
.
.
t
On March 26, 1979 the licensee advised RII that fine linear surface indications were found in a 2" ECCS line while performing inservice inspection. Discussions with the licensee representatives were held and sketches of the relative location of the indications reviewed.
APC0 advised that the line would be replaced and the sections removed would be forwarded to a testing laboratory for analysis.
7.
IE Bulletins (IEB) and IE Circulars (IEC)
(Open) IEB 79-01, Environmental Qualification of Class IE Equipment APC0 responded to RII October 11, 1978 regarding the items covered in IEC 78-08 as they relate to Unit 1.
Response for Unit 2 of IEB 79-01 is forthcoming.
(0 pen) IEB 79-02, Pipe Support liase Plate Designs Using Concrete Expansion Anchor Bolts.
The licensee is placing the required testing emphasis on Unit 1 in order to reduce the outage time during refueling.
(0 pen) IEB 79-03, Longitudinal Weld Defects in ASME SA-312 Type 304 Stainless Steel Pipe Spools Manufactured by Youngstown Welding and Engineering Company.
APCO is reviewing all purchase orders to determine if any of the material described in the IEB has been obtained, ordered or received for Unit 2.
Once this had been determined the required action will be taken.
8.
Project Stat us The licensee advised that at the present there is no change in the fuel loading date of December 1979.
.
2348 285 x