IR 05000348/1979031
| ML19256E405 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 09/26/1979 |
| From: | Belisle G, Dance H, Julian C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256E403 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-31, NUDOCS 7911050148 | |
| Download: ML19256E405 (3) | |
Text
'o,,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
$
I REGION 11
o 101 MARIETTA ST N.W SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 o
.....
Report No. 50-348/79-31 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Biruingham, Alabama 35291 Facility Name: Farley Unit 1 Docket No. 50-348 License No. NPF2 Inspection at Farley Site near Ashford, Alabama Inspected by:
h.
. /
f!/$!79 r
G. A. Belisle "
Date Signed 0*b-
'7fR 6/ ??
C. A. Juliair'
Date Signed Approved by: /
6,mu 7 2 (-/7c
'
f H. C. Dant'e, Section Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspected on September 11-12, 1979 Areas Inspected This special, announced inspection involved 30 inspector-hours onsite in the area of followup of licensee action with regard to Hurricane Frederick Results Within the area inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
/
O 15:
559 7911050 /
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
,
J. D. Woodard, Assistant Plant Manager D. Poole, Operations Superintendent J. E. Upchurch, Shift Supervisor J. J. Clark, Shift Foreman S. Blake, Shift Foreman C. I. McLean, Shift Foreman A. M. Davidson, Shift Supervisor
- J. Odom, Assistant Operations Superintendent
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 13, 1979 with the person indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Review of Licensee Actions in Preparation for Hurricane Frederick The inspectors conducted a review of licensee procedures and actions in regard to the potential effects of Hurricane Frederick.
The unit was in a cold shutdown condition following a refueling outage.
,
Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure 12, Emergency Alert, was reviewed by the inspectors. Section 5.3, National Emergencies, details steps to be taken in the event of flood conditions and severe weather.
The following actions had been or were being taken in response to the potential effects of the Hurricane.
a.
Plant personnel and Central Security Control had been notified b.
The diesels had been operationally checked and proven operable c.
Construction personnel onsite had been notified.
The inspector and plant personnel conducted a survey of outside areas of the plant to verify that loose material or equipment that could be damaged by high winds were secured and that outside doors were secured. Some of
- ?:'
560
.
-2-
.
the areas that were checked included the meteorological tower, service water building, river water building, diesel building, top of the auxiliary building, circulating water pump bay area, and water processing building.
During the tour the inspector noticed two areas of concern:
1.
There were several standard bottles of gas (oxygen & Acetylene) not secured.
2.
In two areas where chlorine containers were stored,the handling equip-ment for moving the containers was not secured.
The licensee immediately took corrective action for securing this locse equipment.
A tour of all levels of the auxiliary building was taken.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
i ") r,
741
, '.:
.) U i
/
s e
d