IR 05000206/1990023
| ML13329A150 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/25/1990 |
| From: | Martin B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Ray H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9006080097 | |
| Download: ML13329A150 (2) | |
Text
SAEG*
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
1450 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210 WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 MAY 2 S 1990 Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 Southern California Edison Company Irvine Operations Center 23 Parker Street Irvine, California 92718 Attention:
Mr. Harold B. Ray, Vice President Nuclear Engineering, Safety, and Licensing Gentlemen:
Subject: Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)
October 1, 1988 through January 31, 1990 This refers to the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)
Board Report Nos. 50-206/90-02, 50-361/90-02, and 50-362/90-02, which was transmitted to you by our letter dated April 11, 1990. During our management meeting at the San Onofre Site on April 25, 1990, we discussed the results of that assessment. A copy of the agenda for our meeting is enclosed. A summary of our discussions at that meeting, which also included SCE presentations on two other subjects, is provided in the enclosed meeting repor As discussed in our April 11 letter, in the Initial SALP Report transmitted by that letter, and during our April 25 meeting, the SALP Board found your overall performance to be very good and directed toward safe facility operation. Specific strong performance was noted to have continued in the Radiological Controls, Security, and Emergency Preparedness functional areas, and improvement in the Maintenance/Surveillance area caused that area to also be considered an area of strength. During our meeting you identified actions being taken to address the relative decline in performance which was observed in the Plant Operations area during this SALP period. Your performance in the Engineering/Technical Support and Safety Assessment/Quality Verification functional areas was observed to have made notable improvements, although we emphasize the importance of your completing several improvement programs you have initiated in these area Our April 11 letter noted that you are not required to reply to the SALP Board's report but could do so, if desired, within 30 days after our April 25 meeting. Based on your comments during that meeting, as described in the enclosed meeting report, we understand that the SCE has no specific comments on the SALP Board's report and does not plan to provide a written respons No changes have therefore been made to the Initial SALP Board Report Nos. 50-206/90-02, 50-361/90-02, and 50-362/90-02, issued by our letter dated April 11, 1990, and it is considered to be the Final SALP Repor In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Roo FD FR
-
-
- MAY 2 5 109 Should you have any questions concerning this letter, the issues discussed in the enclosed meeting report, or the SALP Board's report, we will be pleased to discuss them with yo
Sincerely, Regional Administrh-Vr Enclosures:
1. Copy of meeting agenda 2. Management Meeting Report Nos. 50-206/90-23, 50-361/90-23, and 50-362/90-23 3. SCE presentation slides cc w/enclosures:
D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President H. B. Bridenbecker, Vice President and Site Manager (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, Station Manager (San Clemente)
State of California