IR 05000361/1997007
| ML20141B875 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141B854 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-97-07, 50-361-97-7, 50-362-97-07, 50-362-97-7, NUDOCS 9705160048 | |
| Download: ML20141B875 (2) | |
Text
..
. _.
.
. -.-
.
.
-
_
.. _.
-..
- -.- -.
-
,
..
9 ENCLOSURE
-
i
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
REGION IV
!
'
Docket No.:
50-361
50 362
^
Licenses No.:
NPF-10 i
'
!-
Report No.:
50-361;-362/97-07
-
i
/
Licensee:
Southern California Edison Co.
}.
Facility Name:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
Location:
Camp Pendleton, California
- -
Dates:
April 711,1997
i
!
Inspector:
Bruce Earnest, Physical Security Specialist, Plant Support Branch Approved By:
Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch
Division of Reactor Safety i
l i
ATTACHMENT:
Supplemental Information J
l
,
j l
DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS 9705160048 970509
"
PAGE IS DECON TROLLED PDR ADOCK 05000361
,,
.. __
.
_
.
.
_.
..
,
,
I a
i-2-
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 3 NRC Inspection Report 50-361;-362/97-07
.
This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The areas inspected included review of personnel access control, security organization,
protected area barriers, protected area detection, training and qualifications, assessment aids, plans and procedures, vital area barriers, and vital area detection.
-
Plant Suncort
},
-
'
Personnel access to the protected area was properly controlled (Section S1.1).
- An adequate security organization was in place and capable of meeting security and
'
contingency plan requirements (Section S1.2).
.'
The inspector identified weaknesses in portions of the protected area barrier
(Section S1.3).
An effective perimeter detection system was installed and maintained
(Section S1.4).
,
The training and qualification program for security officers was effective
(Section S1.5).
The assessment aids system provided adequate assessment of the perimeter
- .
detection zones (Section S1.6).
The security procedures contained provisions that did not accurately reflect physical
security plan requirements (Section S1.7).
An adeqi ne vital area barrier system was in place (Section S1.8).
The vital area detection aids were adequate to detect an intruder attempting to
enter the vital areas (Section S1.9).
DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED