ML20209C818

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Guidance Re Required Experience for Chemistry & Radiation Protection Technicians
ML20209C818
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, 05000000
Issue date: 12/02/1983
From: Wenslawski F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Fisher W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML16341D666 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-744 NUDOCS 8404120249
Download: ML20209C818 (1)


Text

. _

_ - . -_ .~

l

  • l

, i g' 1

,',, <.,. UMTEU r1/.T;:

z.-

IR'Cl.E A L MiGU' ATORY COM! *!T.R I

[ ;g..4, c. f' ,, ;[

r.EG M e V

- a . b, . t : munan:a umt. runt "

5.q' <'f nu m cnu x.co. vonma r * -

s DEC 021983 1 MEMORANDUM FOR: William Fisher, Chief, Section B, Engineering and Technical Supgort Branch, IE FROM: F. A. Wenslawski, Chief Radiological Safety 5 ranch, Region V

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE ON REQUIRED EXPERIENCE FOR CHEMISTRY AND RADIATION PROTECTION TECHNICIANS-A number of facilities have a Technical Specification 6.3.1 which states in part "Each member of the unit staff shall meet or exceed the minimum qualifications of ANSI N18.1-1971 for comparable positions...." ANSI N18.1-1971 Section 4.5.2 states " Technicians in responsible positions shall have a minimum of .two years of working experience in their specialty." Some facilities, such as Diablo Canyon, have a unit staff position of Chemistry and 3

Radiation Protection Technician. Chemistry and Radiation Protection are usually considered to be separate specialties, as is the case in section 4.4 of ANSI N18.1-1971 or section 3.2.4 of the revisions to this standard (ANS-3.1-1978 and 1981). Doug Collins in 1981 suggested that if a facility 3

has a combine position then four years of experience, two in each specialty, would be required to meet the standard (see enclosure 1). It is our understanding, however, that NRR has not established a fire position on this i

issue. We believe this issue has generic implications and want to be sure that we are not backfitting a new interpretation of the existing requirement.

We.therefore specifically request guidance on:

i j A. Can we enforce a position that for technicians in responsible positions two years experience in each specialty, Chemistry and Radiation l Protection, are required to meet the Technical Specification?

B. For Radiation Protection technicians in responsible positions does preoperational experience count on a one for one basis to fulfill the ANSI N18.1-1971 experience requirement?

M F. A. Wenslawski, Chief

, Radiological Safety Branch, RV

Enclosure:

As stated cc: M. Shanbaky, RI .

D. Collins, RII R. Greger, RIII B. Murray, RIV F. Congel, NRR ,

j 89[4.1 N I

\l-4

--o- -.www.e----, rm-- m.,,..--,-. .-..y.--- .,.r.~-.-r

7'U+ 'V'U 4" . . N U:::T 3::Tr.T:s i l ',,- / h NUCLEAR RECULATCliY COMMISSION s .- e ensamaron, p.c.aosse

% .i e....

Jul ea g;;; <

Mr. Thomas Devine Ms. Crystal Dixon Government Accountability Project Institute for Policy Studies ,

1555 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 202 IN RESPONSE REFER-Washington, DC 20036 TO F01A-84-744 3

Dear Mr. Devine and Ms. Dixon:

i i

This is in further response to your letter dated September 13, 1984, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Infonnation Act, all documents

}

relevant to and/or generated in connection with the Safety Evaluation Report t (SER) related to the operation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units '

1 and 2, NUREG-0675 Supplement No. 22.

Copies of the 305 documents listed on enclosed Appendix 8 without accession numbers are being placed in the NRC Public Document Roon (PDR) located at 1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555. They will be filed in folder F01A-84-744 under your nare. The documents on Appendix B with accession numbers are already available for inspection and copying at the POR..

The NRC has not completed its review of the remaining documents subject to your request. We will respond as soon as that review is completed.

Since miy, Y

Donnie H. Grimsley, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration a ,

t

Enclosure:

s- stated PDR

Re FOIA-84-744 .

ATPEMDIX B 11._' t I;a.

. 1*3. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION Alletations 3rE ,

1, 3-16-84 3 Problems Statement - ATS No.. (s) NRR 83-02 with Enclosure 2

2. - 3 Allegation or Concern No. 7 (BN No.: 83-03 (1/7/83)
3. - 1 Allegation or Concern No. 5 (BN No.: 83-03 (1/7/83)
4. . A /19176 1 M.W. Kle11ogg Co. Specification Change Notice A11easetoa120', 21*' .

15 . 11/23/s3 1 ' l Allegation Data Form on Diablo Canyon

6. - 3 Allegation or Concern No. 20 .
7. - 2 Problem Statement
8. -

2 Allegation or Concern No. 21

9. - S Problem Statement
10. A 41-St 3 Memo from Kreger. to.R. Tedesco re Diablo Canyon - Supp to SER
11. 12-2-83 5 Memo from Wenslavski to W. Fisher re Req for Guidance on Experience for Chemistry and Radiation Protection Technicians and attachments
12. 10-3-83 4 Inspection Report 3u-275/83-32
13. 12-23-82 1 Routing Slip .
14. 7-29-80 7 Memo frem C. Smith To J. Sniesek re requirements for training.

qualification.,and re-training of power reactors...with attach

! 15. 10-28-80 4 Memo from Kreger to Tedecco re: Supp to SER....

l

16. 2-1 -81 4 Memo from Kreger to Tedesco re Callaway - req for add'1 info
17. - 1 NP Technician Qualifications 18, 2/22/83 11 PC&E Intra-memo re cu'eline form of the jobs accomplished by the Chemistry and Radiation Technicians....
19. 8/15/83 17 PC&E Form with five attachments
20. 4/26/82 14 FC&E (NPAP B-1) Qual of Perconnel on the Plant Staff
21. 4/20/82 21 PCLE's QA Preceduro (AP E-151)
22. 1/20/83 2 Exhibit VI-5

AFPEf: DIX 8 i ITEM No. ~

DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION NO.

Allegationi 20-21 continueo Sep 1975 8 NRC RC 1.8 - Radiation Protection Manager (Position)

! 23.

10 ANSI N18.1 .1971 Qualification - Position: Technical Manager

! 24. -

23. 4/26/83 3 Chemistry & Radiation Protec; tion Tech Resume & Qualif Status ,

f 3- Robert W. Brown - Fractic'al Chemistry Skill Requirements for ~

! 26. 8/11/83 l Chemical and Radiation Protection Technicians i

5/23/82 5 ANSI N18.1-1971 Qualif - Paul Lyon 27.

l 3 Charles L. Dixon , Technician Resume J

28. 4/25/83 i
29. 1/5/83 3 Cary C. Briggs - Technician Resume l

I 30. 1/4/83 3 J. A. Dresser - Technician Resume

31. 11/23/82 '3 Robert Brown - Monitor Resume
32. 11/19/82 3 Mitchell R. Dorsett - Monitor Resume l

11/23/83 20 Ltr from Parameter. Inc to Re81on V (Dennis Kirsch) re inepee f 33. work at Diablo prepared by Kenneth Ristau - enclosures inc.

J

34. - 5 Allegation or Concern No. 22 l
35. 10/3-7/83 4 Inspection Report No. 50-275/83-32'

! Allegation No. 25 22 Ler from FC&E to J. Martin, Region V re responses to allegations 36, 1/27/84 25, 58 and 96 A*o *"* SD3'2 C S / * ** / *" / ** - *18 / 8

f 2/7/84 17 Ltr from FC&E to , Region V ret allegations on concrete expansion 37.

anchors... Mo 64cacio o74 / 'oe/ socc'e/ mairr l

2/16/84 29 Ltr from FC&E to Region V ret anchor bolt sampling program...

l 34.

1/30/84 2 PCEE Interoffice Memo ,re Support for Class 1 Elec Fanels in Cable

! 39.

Allegation Nos.S$

40. - 2 Allegation No. 55 with Problem statement i
41. 10/27/43 1 Allegation Data Form (83-A-0050) j, 10/27/83 53 Report ree'd' by the Telegren-Tribune (San Luis Obispo) l 42.
43. 2/7/84 4 Ltr frem POC to 100 f.rpeel teerd Arc ete. qo=3 3 AcehW

, r::- :c;; c, l

i

Re: F0!A-84-744 APPENDIX 8 ITEM NO.

WO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION

44. 2/3/84 109 Ltr from R. Cloud to Region V. etal re: public meetin8 1/3'1/84..
45. 8/18/80 104 PC&E's No. DC-0-E-M-754
46. 11/9/83 3 DCW Minor Revision
47. - 2 Cuide11nes for Design of PKpe Support (DCM lio. M-9. Rev. 9)
48. - 5 Caseious Radweste System Piping Schematic Drawings
49. - 5 Memorandum f rom *Treeter to Horn re: Resnalysis doe to Nossle... -
30. - 3 Pipe Support Drawings A11easticn No. 57
51. - 21 Allegation No. 57'
52. 11/19/83 3 Allegation and Problem Statement , '
53. 7/14/81 4 Ltr from PC&E to Eisenhut. re: Qualif of Inspection
54. 2/17/44 5 Ltr from PC&E to Martin. Av. re: PC&E responses to Item 57..
55. 2/17/84 i Ltr from PC&E to Region V re cable...
56. 1/22/81 2 Ltr from PG&E to Tedesco re Add'1 Info - Diable Units 1 & 2 .
57. - $ Attachment to HPF/NCR 8802-824. Rev. I
54. - 7 Affidavit of J. Carlson before the ASLA Board
  • l
59. - 10 . Affidavit of A. Johnson before the ASLA Board l
60. - 52 Miscellaneous documents f Allegatia n No. 80
61. - 9 Allegation No. 80 - ATS RV-83-A-64
62. 8/22/S4 2 Memo from Scarano to File subj Task. Fo. 80 - Diablo Canyon i
63. 1,2/2/83 3 Ler from Region V (Martin) to Dr. Kranadorf ret public confideneV in emergency planning at Diablo Canyon W tsseteout
64. - 2 Problem State =ent ATS RV-83-A-64 .

~

65. 2/27/84 2 Ler from Krenzdorf to Scarano ret an ad in SLO newspaper 66.- 1/9/84 6 Ltr from Kranzdorf to Martin. RV re:Energency Response Plan

Re: F0!A-64-744 APPENDIX B ITEM No.

NO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION

67. 3/23/84 1 Ltr from Scarano to Kransdorf re: evaluation on allegatione

.68. 12/2/83 18 Ltr from Martin to Kranzdorf re: lack of public confidence in emergency planning Ano esits.oe 42t

69. 12/30/83 11 Ltr from Martin to Kranzdorf re: " Twin Bridges".. ,
70. 12/9/83 8 Ltr from Kransdorf to Martin re La'ck of public confidence....
71. 8/31/82 7 Initial Decision
72. 1/18/84 4 FEMA ltr to Region V re: correspondence sent to NRC from Kranadorf dated 12/9/83
73. 12/16/83 2 Ltr from FEMA to Region V re: Itr addreseed to Falladino from Kranadorf ,
74. 1/30/84 1 Ltr from Texas A&M University to Temple re report on Fog.....
75. 2/1/84 2 Ltr from Texas A&M University to Temple ret evacuation..
76. - 8 National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 95
77. August '69 35 Effect of Rain on Freeway Capacity by R. Jones
78. - 7 Evacuation Time Consideratione 7p. 12/9/83 27 Memo f ram A. McQueen to File re Conference Call regarding Kransdorf Letter Allegatioti Nos. 92 & 93 .
80. - 2 Allegation Nos. 92 & 93 ATS RV-83-A-063 31, 1/3/83 2 Note written by Kirsch (RV)
82. 3/13/84 1 Memo from Reynolds to Bishop re Tubular Steel RAD 11 and Nudosa/.

F.*4 0 85c 50 90:45

83. 4/7/84 3 Ltrewo fron PC&E to Moore etal re: error contained in PC4E's Itr sto ucote4 / roshocu / so-usat
84. '4/11/84 11 PCSEJogo,oge4 e 1,tf re,: ery)rin t A of PC4E's letr....

, 85. 4/11/84 23 ter fre,PC&E to Martin re: PC&E's response to 4/6/84 ltr...

koto B'40'tilo .4 fe',

86. 4/13/84 2 NRCnol.etter to r cre, etal re: Japanese tube steel...

efem c:_% / r::,/ ws:.s / co-tis q j

87. 1/7/84 149 ter fre,rc's to r rtfn re: tcst's reseense en the velding progran j ,

ia e w ;o :. 2 / r a e,t a t m f s o. p h e

88. 2/29/84 14 Ler frm rcr.c to y,rtin rei veld bevel angles & tube steel radium nuo r e:e t e s.2 i -- - _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ . .

Re: FOIA-84-744 4 .

  • APPENDIX B j

i .

,#~

l

{, NO.

ITEM DATE PAGES DESCPIPTION

] NO._

1 3

Ltr from PC4E.to Martin re: Pipe Support Tube Steel

! . O, 4/25/84 6/8/84 82 Ltr frois PC&E to Eisenhut re: final info on Item *7 of License i 90. Condition 84o61re ssi -

EC&G to Kirsh rei Diablo Canyon Tube Steel Desian Verification ".

4/19/84 6 ,

l 91.

& Mbao from B. Wagner. RV to Kirsch re Tube Steel RADII Measurements.

! 92. 5/21/84 8 Memo from Bishop to chandler re: Tube Steel RADIl Measurements 93 6/13/84

) CAP lte to Nunzio Palladino re: Tube Steel sample ago1 Sossi 94, 6/22/84 i - 39 Miscellaneous documents 4/25/84 3 Ltr from PG&E.to Martin re Pipe Support Tube Steel

,' 89, i

90. 6/8/84 82 Ltr from PC&E to Eisenhut ret final info on Item 7 of License
Condition 34o6erotst -

6 EC&G to Kirsh re: Diablo Canyon Tube Steel Desian Verification

$1. 4/19/84 f

5/21/84 4 M'so e from B. Wa8ner. RV to Kirsch re Tube Steel RAD 11 Measurements l 92.

93. 6/13/84 8 Memo from Bishop to Chandler re: Tube Steel RADII Measuremente j '
94. 6/22/84 CAP ltr to Nunzio Palladino re Tube Steel sample I

- 59 Miscellaneous ,

i 95.

f Allegation Jo. 96 j

- 3 Allegation No. 96 ATS No. RV-83-A-63 l 96.

! .97. 3/6/84 2 Probism Statement - #96 .

1/11/84 2 Summary of Special Inspeetion 9g, _

l 13 9 , 9/25/83 1 Report from Doberne & Bigbnson. Consultin8 En81neere

' U* 1/27/84 52 Ltr from PC&E to Martin. Region V re response to alle8ations...

\

l i l

l

Re: F0!A-84-744 .

APPENDIX B

~

ITEM NO.

NO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION Allegation No. 98 4

101. . 3 Allegation No. 98 ATS No. RV-83-A-0085 -

l .

102. - 7 Problem Statement

] 103, 12/10/79 6 Procedure No. QCP-507

-104. 9/14/83 7 Procedure No. SP-304 105. 5/13/83 12 Procedure No. SP-505 i

10G. I'2/20/82 4 Procedure No. SP-805-1 1

2-10-84 5 Summary of Allegations (Mr. Dosseyl ,

107.

4 Memo Bishop to Shackleton jgg, -

109. 2/10/84 101 Ltr from PG&E to Martin. RV re Bostrom-Bergen/Meddco Metals j Allegations Investigation. .interia Report - gnclosure

- 3 " Leads for Bostrom-Bergen Investigation Per Discussion with l 110* Don Driskill ,

gjj, - 1 Summary of Allegations /Concerne for Bostrom-Pergen...

12/8/83 2 PC&E Interof fice Memo from Rockwell to Bishop ret Request for .lafe 412.

113. 1/10/84 2 Conversation Record between Joukoff and Bishop j .;)4, - 2 l Suenary of Allegations Otr. Dossey 12/83)

! 115.

- 9 Insp at Diablo (Visual Insp of Installed Nardware) i 2/23/84 12 Bostrom-Bergen/MEDDC0 Metals Allegations Investigation .

-11 6.

117. - 6 froblem Statement 4

Il8- 1-20-84 15 Allegation No. 99

! .119. 3/14/84 6 ATS Q5-83-024/Rv83A00$8 l~

e

R2: F0!A-84-744

,. APPENDIX B _

ITEM NO.

- NO. DATE PACES DESCRIPTION 120. 3/23/84 54 Ltr from PC&E yo Martin. RV ret final report on PC&Es sampling of Bostrom-Bergen/Meddco-Metals (BB/MM) materials 121. 3/23/84 3 Ltr from PC&E (DC1,-84-112) %4 o4 a t e : U, -Po e-122. 2/29/84 45 Ltr from PG&E to Martin re:* forwarding Materials Sampling Program interim report for Bostrom-Ilergen/Keddco-Metals

  • A11eastic n No.101

.123. - 6 Allegation No. 101 - RV-83A-0073 3/9/84 i Problem statement T2'4.

125. 12/2/83 1 Inter-office Communication the Neward F. Foley Co.

1 76 .

- 1 Action items / Noncompliance items

.127. 12/8/83 4 Allegation Data Form g, - 4 Information 129. 1/12/84 2 Susanary of Special Insp. Relatied Information '

j g., - 1 ATS RV-83A-0073

,ggj, . - 8 The Howard P. Foley Co. Nonconformance Report -

,132. 10/3/83 2 H.P. Foley Transmittal 133. 10/5/03 . 3 H.P. Foley Transmittal ,

134. 10/7/83 5 H.P. Foley Nonconformance Report 13$. 10/5/83 2 H.P. Foley Transmittal

,136l 10/7/83 4 H.P. Foley Noncenformance Report 137. 9/26/83 3 H.P. Foley Engineering Disposition Request 133, 10/7/83 6 R.F. Foley Engineering Disposition Request ,

139, - 1 Ltr from Michale Leygart (?) to Rick Wilson

.dC. . - 1 Ltr from Vines to Roselli 34j, 10/10/83 2 Ltr from T. Roselli to 7. Vines

.? 2 Non Confornance Repret r

1 l

~ Re: F0!A-84-744 l -

i Appendix 8 NO.

f ITEM l NO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION a

i 143. 10/13/83 2 H.P. Foley Nonconformance Report j 144. 10/24/83 2 Commente on Disposition of NCR 8802-871. Rev. 2 j 145. 10/13/83 2 N.F. Foley Nonconformance Report 146. 10/13/83 2 H.P. Foley Nonconformance Rdport . .

l 147. 10/13/83 2 H.P. Foley Nonconformance Report I 148. 6/13/83 1 H.F. Foley Nonconformance Report i Allenatia m No, 98 149. 3/5/84 3 ATS No. RV 83-A-0085 150. - 37 ATS No. RIII 83A-85 i

! A11eastie m No. 128 & 129 1

i j 151. - 6 No. 182 - RV83A081 152. - 1 ATS RV-83A-081 j 153.

- 5 Allegation No. 128 - RV83A081 154, 3/10/84 1 Problem Station '- Allegation No. 128 l

155. - 1 Allegation Form l

156. - 1 Problem Statement (No. 128} .

157. 12/23/83 1 Allegation Data Foru 2/10/84 Problem Statement page 1 of 2)

) 158, 1 159. 12/23/83 7 Allegation Data Form (RV-83-A-0031) t' 160. 3/10/84 2 Transcript of Steven Lockert 161. - 39 Miscellaneous f

R3: F0IA 84-744

! Appendix 8 .

ITEM NO. .

NO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION 4

l 162. - 2 Pulsenan QA Program - KFF-10 j 163. 12/_23/83 1 A11eaet19t Data Form 164. 12/23/83 1 Allegation Data Form ,- .

165. 11/23/69 15 Kellogg Co - Misc 166. - 17 Miscellaneous Interoffice Correspondence from Kerner to QC Insp re: Final ,

167. 12/8/83 2 As-Built Inspection 168. - 3 As-Built Review Checklist l

8/31/83 10 DCN's i 169. ~

i 170. 7/21/83 1 Interoffice memo from Stieser/R. Faull to All Filed heartarandene i

171. 7/21/83 2 Interoffice memo l

4 172. - 3 Miscellaneous 173. - 1 ATS RV84A009. Q5-84-011 l 174. 3-12-84 1 QS-84-011 l 175. 2/3/82 2 FG6E Memo re: Adherence to NRC Regulations Open Door Policy 176. 3/16/84 - 1 Froblem Statement I 177. 1/21/84 2 Memo from Martin to Ben Hayes re: Reg for Invest of Allegations...

178. 1/84 4 ' Allegation Data Forms .

I 179. - 13 Ltr from Hudson to Cilinsky re: Report #3

  • QA Diecrepancies...

I 180. 1/10/84 12 statemente by Thompson /Kireh/Schoenberger, etc. ,

t 181. 11/25/69 14 Wald Procedure Code No. 7/8 7

Energy Reorganisation Act - Employee Protection Provimien l 182. 1/80 183. - 1 Internal Revenue Service Notice i  !

I

.- - - ~. - _ . . .- -- - _ _ .

RE: FOIA 84-744 .

APPENDIX B ITFJ4 NO. ,

NO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION Allegation No. 167

] .

i 1

184. -

2 PG&E Audits of Foley l 185. 7/16/74 4 Ler from Maxfie1d to Foley Co re: audit performed 7/_15/74 l

186. 8/16/74 3 Ltr f rom Maxfield to Foley re audit 7/29/74

]

187. 3/5/76 5 Ltr from Maxfield to Atkinson Co. re: review of Spec 8771....

188. 4/19/76 1 Ltr from Maxfield to Atkinson Co. re: audit response..

189. 4/12/76 1 Ltr from Scharf to Maxfield re: Fol.ey's response..

190. 4/8/76 1 Ltr from Addleman to Cravelle re: corrective actions...

191. 3/29/76 1 Ltr from Crave 11e to Foley Co ret transmitting PG&E's audit...

192. 3/5/76 4 Ltr from Day to File re: Foley Co. Documentation Spec 8771...

193. 3/5/76 2 Audit Reply - Spec 8771...

194. 4/6/76 1 Memo f rom Larry Sousa re: MA 308 Actuators 195. 4/6/76 1 Memo from Larry Souza re: Material Documentation 196. 3/23/76 2 Inspection Report 117. 6/28/76 1 Ltr from Addleman to Maxfield to PG&E contract 22C-8802-2 198. 5/21/76 1 Ler from Maxfield to Foley Co ret aduit performed on. . Class 1...

199. 5/21/76 8 Memo from Don Day to File - Spec 8802/8807 200. 6/21/76 7 Audit Reply - Purchase Documentation & Procedures  ;

201. 7/29/76 1 Ltr from Addleman re PG&E contract 22C-8802-2 202. 7/19/76 1 Ler from Friedrichs to Foley Co. ret audit on Class 1...

203. 7/19/76 3 Memo to file re: H. Foley Response to PC&E Audit EA-7-76

~

204. 6/16/76 3 Memoufrom Foley to R. Volk ret 1tre of Compliance...

205. 6/21/76 1 Ltr from Addleman to All Vendors re Letter of Compliance 206. 2/25/77 1 Ltr from Friedrichs to Foley re: aduit 2/2-2/8/77

, 207. 2/25/77 3 Ler from Mulhall to File re: H.P. Foley, Recorde Audit 208. 5/19/78 4 Ltr from Tresler to Moses tot adwi t < a '.\ Proce wr e. . .

- - - - - - - - - - " ~

RE: FOIA 84-744 APIDDIX B f;

ITEM

~

t:0.

NO. DATE PACES DERCRIPTION 209. 8/18/7% 1 Ltr from Moses to Tresler re PG&EC'ontraci22C-8802-2 l

210. 7/20/78 1 Ltr from Tresler to Moses re an extension j ,

] 211. 7/18/78 2 Ltr from Moses to Trester re FC4E contract 22C-8802-2

~

l 212. 11/18/80 3 Ltr from Fost to Et:1er re: Audit of M. Foley ,

213. 2/22/82 ) Ltr from Bratton to Etzler re audt in January 1982

214. 11/17/82 46 Interoffice meno from Bratton to Coley re: Audit of Foley Co.

i

! 215. 5/24/74 3 Ltr f rom M. Dobrzensky re: Audit of Foley's " Internal Audits" 216. 6/19/74 4 Ltr from Maxfield to Foley Co. re QA Audit j 217. 11/12/74 5 Ltr from Maxield re audit of 11/11/74

) 218. 12/2/74 5 Ltr from Maxfield ret audit of 74-28

^

219. 9/26/75 5 Ler from Maxfield to Foley re audit i

i 220. 10/13/75 6 Ler from Addlersn to Lorens re Contract 22C-8802-2 I

l 221. 10/23/75 1 Ltr from Nelson to Mr.xfield ret panele I

j 222. 11/17/75 1 Ltr from Addleman to Maxfield re audit ,

223. 9/26/75 7 Ltr from Maxfield to Foley ret audit on equip installation....

I 224. 1/12/76 1 Ltr from Addleman to Maxfield ret follow-up report...

225. 9/26/75 5 Ltr from Maxfield to Foley re audit performed on equip...

226. 3/3/76 3 Ltr from Addleman to Maxfield re follow-up report ...

227. 11/5/75 11 Ltr frca Lorens to Maxfield rei audit (reply date: 11/19/75) 228. 11/3/75 6 Ler from Maxfield to Foley ret audit on wire pu111n8...

229. 11/19/75 1 Ltr from Maxfield to roley res' solenoid valves, etc.

230. 12/5/75 13 Ltr from Addle =an to Maxfield re: corrective actione..

~

231. 11/19/75 1 Ltr from Maxfield to Foley re solenoid valves...

232. 11/26/75 -

1 Ler frem Maxfteld to Foley ret ident of switches & devices...

f-233. 1/12/76 13 Ler from Addleman to Mr.xfield re revised report. Attach 2 l

234. 11/12/75 1 Ltr from Nelson to Maxfield re: lack of ident of solenoid valves..

l

RE: F0!A 84-744 APPECIX 8 ITEM NO.

l WO. DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION 235. 1/16/76 1 Ltr f rom PC&E to .% Foley Co : Spc 8802/8807 i 236. 1/13/76 2 Memo from Dou pay to File re High Voltage Terminations 237. 2/10/76 3 Ltr.from Foley to PC&E re corrective actione 238. 3/23/76 3 Ltr from PC&E to Foley re: Quality Control Audit Follow-up 239. 6/21/76 1 Ltr from PC&E to Foley re: Quality, Control Audit ,

}

i 240. 6/21/76 2 Memo f rom PG'.E to File re Audit EA-8-76...

241. 7/22/76 1 Ltr from Foley to Friedrichs re: corrective actions..

. 242. 6/21/76 4 Ltr from PC&E to Foley re Spec 8802/8907 243. 8/27/76 1 Ltr from PC&E to Foley re: QA Audit i 244. 8/27/76 1 Ltr fron PC&E tp Friedriche re: audit performed in August..

, 245. 8/27/76 6 Ltr from PC&E to File re: Audit EA-15-76...

246. 9/29/76 9 Ler from Foley to Friedriche re
Audit 247. 11/11/76 2 Ltr from PG&E to File: rst EA-17-76...

248. 11/30/76 35 Ler from Foley to Friedrichs with atte.chments 249. 1/29/80 3_ Memo irom Arnold to Rockwell re: audic EA 88-04 250. 8/1/80 3 Memo from PC&E to Leppke, etal re Audit DCl-80-10...

l 251, 10/15/80 3' Memo from PG&E to Etzler re: DCO-80-022 252. 12/1/80 5 Memo from PG&E to Etzler re: DCO-80-025

, 253. 3/17/81 3 Memo from PG&E to Etzler re: DCO-81-008 254. 4/9/81 3 Memo from PG&E to Etzler re DCO-81-009 255. 5/12/81 j' Memo from PG&E to Etzler re DCO-81-014 256. 7/30/81 4 Memo from PG&E tb Etzler re DCO-81-021 257. 9/28/81 4 Memo from PC&E to Etzler re: DCO-81-032 258, 10/12/81 , 3 Ltr from PC&E to Etzler re: DCO-81-033 '

259. 3/4/82 5 Memo from PG&E to Et:1er rei DCO-82-020 260. 5/5/82 4 Memo from PC&E to Etzler re DC1-82-006 261. 5/11/82 4 Memo from PC&E to Etzler re: DCO-82-021 262. 8/13/82 5 Memo from PC&E to Etzler rei DCO-82-027 263. 8/13/82 2 Memo from PC&E to Et:1er re: DCO-82-029 264. 12/31/82 5 Memo from PC&E to Et:1er re DQO-82-049 265. 1/24/83 3 Memo from PG&E to Coley rea Audit of Foley Co. Welding Electrode..

266. - 1 Inter Departmental Interference 267. 11/2/83 2 Memo frem Ecb He-. an to QA/QC Redliners re; As-Euilt Discrepant..

268. - 21 Miscellanous 269. 7/21/83 -

1 Memo frca Stieger to Field Superintendent 270. - 1 PG&C Dtawins

l ret.FOIA 94-744. _...

.appgggg *g .

l ,

f , ..

i.:' , . '

l

  • non

~

NO. . . .:

30 0 . ^^*E PAGES DESCRIPTION '

il' .

!- 271. - 1 Drawing -

272. 7/2/83 5 Drawings .*

- l; -

y y . -i' l 273. - 1 Drawing '

2 4. - 2 Drawings t , . . j j

l 275. - 29 Drawings c g ,( '

276. - 5 Description of Changes , .- - ,

, g, j 277. - 2 Materials Description /-- .T .

! 273. - 3 weekly Welders qualif atatus ~-,, i j 279. - 2 Drawings ...,7 f '

280. - 9 Mie-ellaneous  ; , :., i 281. - 1 Drawing # 'i- , ,

282. - 4 Drawings .' -hI 283. - 4 Drawings "

, [ , 's ;-

284. - 5 Drawings

.l. ,- ?, l 285. 7/21/83 3 Memo from Stieger to Field Superintendente '

. - , 4;j 286. - 1 Drawing ,

f; : :., '

16 Deswings . . ' '- 1 297. - .,

288. - 7 Drawinge ,

.,'tl l 299. - 3 Drawings - ,- y;,

i Rosettoes 166-179 ,

., 4. !

- tj 290. 1/M 1 A11*sations Data Form '

,. t 291. - 1 Allegation or Concern No. 168 .

, T. I r 292. - 1 Allegation or Concern No. 169 '

293. - 2 Allegation er Concern No. 170 f I A13mgation Bo p. 171-177 .

] 294. 3/16/84 1 Problem Statement (No. 171-177) "

295. 1/23/34 2 Memo from Ebersole to Ben Bayee re Allegations re Constr....

2%. - 1 Allegation or Concern No. 171 , ..-

297. - 1 Allegation or Concern No. 172 .

296. - 2 Allegation or Concern No. 173 -

299. - 2 Enclosure to PG&E Ltr No. DCL S4-187 '

I 300. - 2 Allegation er Concern No. 174 .

301, 1/23/84 2 Memo from Ebersole to Bayee Rat Allegations te cemete. Practices '

302. -

1 Allegation or Concera No. 173 -

303. 1/27/84 1 Allegation Data Fora j 304. - 1 Allegation er Concera No. 176 -

j 305. 3/9/84 1 Problem Statement 4

1 1

i 4

e .

CZ.i.:l.'.:: 7 ACCOUNTADIUTY PROJECT i l Institute for Pohcy Studies l 1901 Que Sueet. N.W., WosNngton. D.C. 20009 (202)234 9302 .

i

. september 13,19s4 FREED 0bi 0F INFORMATiOrt f Director M REWT Office of Administration hg f y,,

U.S. helear Regulatory Commission h f

Washington DC 20555 -

k 9 p /ej g l To Ubom It May concern:

1

  • Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 5552, the Government Accountability Project (CAP) request copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, draf ts,

{ minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, l

procedures, instructions, files, graphs, engineering analyses, charts, maps, photo-5 graphs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, tele-i phone messages, computations, voice recordings. any other dasa compilations, interin j and/or final reports, status reports, and any other records relevant to and/or f generated in connection with the Safety Rvaluation Report toisted to the operation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I and 2, NUFIG-0675, supplement No. 22 j which provided the NRC Staff's further findings on whistleblower charges. We request that each responsive document be identified by the allegation number (s) to which it j may relate.

If any of the materials covered by this request has been destroyed and/or removed,

[ please provide all surrounding documentation, including but not limited to a de-i scription of the action (s) taken, relevant date(s), and justification (s) for the action (s).

i CAP request that fees be waived, because " findings information can be considered as l primarily benelitting the general public " 5 U.S.C. 5552(a)(4)(A). CAP is a non-profit, non-partisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open L government. Through legal representation, advice, national conferences, films, pub-j lications and public outreach, the project pron.ctes whistleblowers as agents of j government accountability. We are requesting the above information as part of an on-going monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's ef forts to protect public safety and health at nuclear power plants. *

. For any documents or portions that you deny due to a specific F01A exemption, pisase provide an index itemizing and describing the documents or portion of documents withheld. The index should provide a detailed justification of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld. This index is required under Vaunhn v. Rosen(1),

484 F.2d. 420 (D.C. Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).

We look forward to your response to this request within tea days.

Your trul _ o ,. 2 , , s , ,. y

  • "Y-ruro r
x Thomas Devine N&

Crystal Dixon Imgal Director

- Legal Intern

+

i_ . --

{, am,,6* **Et., .

~*s . s

'..s...

Vi UIhTLD s 1

, 'I 'y. .

NUCLErAR HFGIJt Al _ , 'iMISSION g '. h C./ 4 -l

.j , . .,; . ,:

viasmitectoN;o. :ss -

4

,.,p*/ . /////63

...* 1383 NOV -1 AM D 40 g%1h. ,

Docket $os.: 50-775 and 50-323 FEB 171981 RES10NVl3E

//Ed y ggg MEMORANDUM 10R: Robert L. Tedesco. Assistant Director i

i for Licensing, DL ,

3 FROM: William E. Kreger, Assistant Director -

for Radiation Protection, D5I *

, 5 5UBJECT: $1ABLO CANYON ' SUPPLEMENT TO SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT .

\ .- .

I PLANT IMME: Dihblo Canyon Nuclear Power Station. Units 1 and 2  :

LICFNSING STAGE: OL  ?

DOCKET NUMBERS: 50-275/323 '

Mit ESTUNE NUMBER / BRANCH CODE: 40/33 RESPONSIBLE BRANCH: LBf3; 8. C. Buckiey,l.PM l-DESCRIP110N OF RESPONSE: Supplenent to SER .

REV1FW STATUS: Continuing Enclosed is a suppl ..ent to the Diablo Canyon Safety Evaluation Report. There are no open iter.s for Fuel Loading. This report sunwarizes the status of the ,

. Three Mile Island Lessons Learned items from NUREGS-0578/0737 which are reviewed i by the Radiation Protection Section (RPS) and includes results from the site and corporate visit on January 70 8 21, 1981. The RPS review encompasses:

7 tem II.B.2(2.1.6.b) - access to areas, not including vital equipnent protection; Its II.B.3(2.1.8.a) - post-accident sampling ALARA considerations, not including systems and procedures; Item II.F.l(2.1.8 b .- high range in-containment raaf ation monitors; Item III.D.3.3(2.1.8.c))- portable radioiodine air .

sampling and analysts; and Item I.B.I.2 from NUREGS-0660/0694 - radiation protection ~ organtiation only.

Status of Review

  • II.B.2 -

Open for full power - Response from loplicant expected in feoruary.

Final 55ER subject to Formal submittal.PG&E has draft document completed. Explanation attached.

II . T.1 -

Complete for fuel Loading. Closed for full power subject to ' receipt of additional commitments,regarding in-situ calibration and relibration frequency requested. SSER attached.

!!I.D.3.3 - Satisfactory /Cnmplete for FL/FP - Updated 55ER attached to g October 28, 1980 letter.

?l fM7$W .

'N,, . . .

-- -a .-. ,

l . . .

~4 I

FEB 171381 R.'Tedesco ,

1 - -

l

  • ,\

I .8.1. 2 - Satisfactory /Completc for FL/fP - subject to receipt of written h commi tments. SSER cttached.

II.B.3 - Satisfactory /C'ompleta for FL - SSER attached to October 28, .

  • 1980 letter.

This evaluation was performed _by R. J. Serbu, RPS, RAB.

William E. Kreger, Assist t Director for Radiation Protection Division of Systems Integration e

Fnclosure: o As Stated i 1

cc: w/unclosure D. Ross  !

F, Mlraglia  !

,- B/ Buck 1cy *l

!* D. Collins .

"T. Murphy ,

I R. Serbu e

e u

e e

j s

6 g'

3 a .

j 1

.2- '

{

t

  • 6 The Diabic Canyon C&RP organization has sufficient depth to provide backup to the C8RP Supervisor. The incumbent CARP Supervisor meets the requirenents of Regulatory Guide 1.8, and his designated backup, the Senior Chemistry Tnd Radiation Protection Engineer, also meets the requiremehts. PG&E has comatitted that any replacements for the designated CARP Supervisor backup

.also will meet Regulatory Guide 1.8, assuring that both chc:nistry and radiation protection functions will have adequate technical and management expertise to cope with all conditions.

  • While the radiation protcotton' functions and chemistry functions are -

consolidated in the sa.T.e organization, personnel assigned to perform and J mar. age these functions have the necessary training and experiente to satis-  ;

factorily perform both functions and ' provide the essential support and l Quality control functions. Additionally, retraining qualification, and i retraining programs which will provide standarization and improvement of ,

C&RPT skill levels, ant' 'nhance both the quality control and support 3 functions, are being developed. a sufficient radiation protection technicians have been hired, trained, and f qualified to provide an ANSI 18.1 qualified C&RP Technician on cach shift, [

and sufficient numbers of qualified C&RP Technicians will be availabic to 6

- provide support during normal operations, outages, and THI-type accidents, 'g

- The facility planning and scheduling groups have adequate raeans to allot -

radiation protection support as necessary. f Special Problems ,

Fortions of this 55ER are subject to receipt of written commitments q

(FSAR) from PG&E as follows:

l j

~

(1) The designated backup to the C&RP Supervisor will meet Regulatory

  • Guide 1.8 '

(2.) The nature of the direct access / support between the Plant Manager, j Corporate groups, and the C&RP Supervisor will be stated.

v. f.ROXCIED END DATE Completc with above commitments subinitted-expected 2/28/81.

l l

  • f

, *g  !

- . s j

11.B.2 .1 r

  • t f*

_APPLICANT'S FILINGS (11.

By letters dated 2/29/80. 3/17/80. 3/31/80. 4/9/80, and 4/11/80, PG3E has i subitted commitments and documentation of actions toE 0737.

iv . STATUS REPORT _

Discussion and Status We 2/ 81.

expect to receive a finalShielding versionmodifications of their shieldigi review isThe for vital area and are pending corpora,te approval. ,

access were observed to already be under way at Diablo Canyon.

~

- Special Problems Subittal of the shielding review document should be accomplished at lea'2 to meet our NUREG-0737 position, four months before full power

v. FROJECTED END DATE .

r February 1981.

i' i

}

i 9

4 e

L 6

o

(. t O

-e-

, t.

. 'I.B.1.2 '

I lit. APPLTCANT'5 FILINGS .

By letter dated 9/3/80, PG8E has submitted comitments and documentation of f actions to be taken at Diablo Canyon to impicment short term lessons learned  !

in accordance with NUREGS-0660/0694. Through interviews conducted during (

an on-site visit at Diablo Canyon on 1/20/81. ind at PG&E Corporate Head '

quarters on 1/21/81 PG&E provided additional positions and made commit-ments to implement short term lessons learned in accordance with HUREGS- '

06bO/0694. '

h iv. STATUS REPORT h D L Discussion and Status o The Radiation Protcetion Organization .(Chemistry and Radiation Protection)  ;

at Diablo Canyon has been evaluated in accordance with NUREG-057P,/0560/0694, I and the organf ration is acceptable in structure and functions for. both fuel k loading and full power operations.

{,

In tne Diablo Canyon Chemistry and Radiation Protection (C&RP) Organization. }

the Supervisor (equivalent to Radiation Protection Manager) reports to a high level plant position - the Plant Superintendent, along with operations, j

g m'aintenance, technical, and clerical organizations. This places the radiation ,

protection function on the same level as the operations functions, and provides  ?

! independence from operating pressures. Additionally, the C&RP Supervisor has 1,5

\

direct access to the Plant Manager on any matters, including radiation i protection problems or support, and to the Corporate staff, particularly in i the radiation protection area, at all times. The support and interaction f-between the C&RP Supervisor, the Plant Superintendent, the Plant Manager, and j the Corporate groups is strongly evidenced by the extensive programmatic, t conceptual, and financial support given to the radiation protection program. l Examples-of such support and interaction are the procurement of equipe.cnt such 4

l as a whole body counter and separate multichannel analyzer. for radiochemistry  ;

l and radiation protection functions; prompt evaluation of the refueling transfer r i tube path and the installation of shielding; analysis and shielding of a f potential exposure source from in core detectors; thorough analyses of potential E post-accident conditions and implementation of ALARA-oriented modifications, N such as at the primary system sampling facility. The C&RC Supervisor is also I a ccmber of the Plant Staff Review Co.nmittee, providing a high level of inter- j action and review for the radiation protection function. In addition to the ,

functional interaction and access to upper management and corporate support 4 which exists for the C&RP Supervisor, ' '

PGSE has committed to formalize this t policy in the FSAR.

  • l l

~

l 1 l .

l  !

l l 1 l

r

. I k

II.F.1

% I

. al

[. f fit. APPLICANT'S FILINGS

~

By letters dated 2/29/80, 3/17/80, 3/31/80, 4/9/80. 4/11/80, and 9/22/80, PG&E has subnitted comitments and' documentation of actions to be taken at Diablo Canyon by PG&E to implement short term, lesson learned items in NUREGS-0578/0737.

iv. _ STATUS REPORT .

~

,- Discussion and Status

  • Diablo Canyon will have two high ranghcontainment radiation monitors installed'. i PG&E has committed to have them installed in accordance with the imp}eme dates of NUREG-0737. The instruments will measure the range 1 to 10 R/hr.

1 with the capability to measure 60 Key photons. Separate power supplies frem separate vital buses will be provided, along with control room readout and recording capability on the Post Accident Monitoring Panel. Location in-containment is such that there are no in-containment shielding interferences or potential "hotspots" to interfere with representative readings. The seismic ,

and 1.100.

environmental qualifications will comply sith Regulatory Guides 1.89 and system. Automatic functional checks will be performed every 25 minutes by the The commitments for Diablo Canyon ruet our positions in NUREGS-0578/

0564/0690/0737 h and are acceptable for Tuel Loading. A review of the equipment p installation and operation will be performed during a routine inspection.

' -f Special Problems i

The monitor descriptions is acceptable for full power subject to receipt of a j written commitments regaroing calibration using sources and calibration frecuency.

l

. v. PROJECTED END DATE  :

February, 1981. L e

e 4

e e

e l

k.

.