ML20210E591
Text
-
e
[' f ' -
UN111 D sI A1Es
.g
- * 'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-a wassincioN. o. c. ror.ss
,4, s * *'* /
FEB ;
- 1081 DOCKET N05: 50-483 i
and 50-486 1
MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing, DL
~
FROM:
William E. Kreger, Assistant Director for Radiation Protection, DSI
SUBJECT:
CALLAWAY - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Plant Name: Callawai 1'and 2.
Licensing Stage: OL Docket Number:
50-483/486 LBil; R. Stark, LPM
-Responsible Branch:
Request for additional information based on FSAR review Description of Response:
Review Status: Continuing The Radiological Assessment Branch has reviewed the Snupps - Ca11away iadiation protection program as described in their FSAR with respec criteria for utility management and technical competence of _their staff. Ques -
tions. relating to issues arising from this review are enclosed with this memo.
The licensee will be required to respond to these questions before we can com-
/
plete our review. The review was perfonned y S. Block, RPS, RAB.
t,, /
(CTA44 M'
William E. Kreger, Assistp Director for Radiation Protecti Division of Systems Integration
Enclosure:
As' stated cc:
D. Ross W. Houston W. Gacmill H. Berkow /W. Russell T. Murphy D. Collins B.J. Youngblood R. Stark RPS Staff 8603280023 860123 PDR 7
1
-744 fl
~
s
- d s
.?
pq l~=-
t/.}*
ic. I a.B t-h Concurrent to the, change request in 331.2 above Figure 13.1-3 should g$
R.g also show that Health Physics technicians and Chemistry technicians become separate groups, be qualified separately as Chemistry and Radia-tion Protection Technicians, and each report directly to their respective
-x
. h Radiation Protection and Chemistry group managers. This change request-sh
/
h is also in accordance with the aforementioned draft document,
? y Please describe your plan to provide backup coverage in the event of 331.4 q%-
q.
the absence of the RPM and outline the qualifications of the individual 4..RT who will 'act as the backup. The December 1979 revision of ANSI 3.1 g
An specifies that the temporary replacement for an RPM should have-a BS jeg degree in science or engineering, 2 years experience in radiation h--
protection,1 year of which should be nuclear power plant experience, I: {$!$
6 months of which should be on-site, ii k l NE
- .q 331.5 Section 13.1.2.3 specifying shift crew composition does not state that
- h I
1 I
! Eg H.P. technician will be onsite at all times (e.g., including back-g an shift and weekends). NUREG-0654 " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation
'].y.,.
m.
M:
of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparation in Support of TS
~
y
~ Nuclear Power Plants" requires that 'a radiation protection technician, t;.
,, '.f whose qualifications are described in ANSI 18.1, shall be onsite at 1.
Section 13.1.2.3, as Oritten, would allow a designated
- i
. all times.
member of the shift crew (e.g., reactor operator) to act as a health-
~1, i
' -]
physics technic'ian if he is qualified to impicment radiation protection i
+s It should be noted that this qualification is no longer g.
n procedures.
Only an assigned g
acceptable to the staff after the reactor is at pot.er. -
health physics technician will be acceptable based on new staff req QY
. Section 13.1.2.3_should be revised accordingly, y
! Ps
- m. ~..s tm,.
-