IR 05000139/1978004

IE Insp Rept 50-139/78-04 on 780706.No Noncompliance Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan,Protection of Snm,Access Control,Alarm Sys & Protection Against Radiological Sabotage

ML20054C799
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, 05000139
Issue date:	07/06/1978
From:	Mortensen W, Norderhaug L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML19323G049	List: IR 05000083/1975002 IR 05000083/1977004 IR 05000139/1975001 IR 05000139/1975002 IR 05000139/1976001 IR 05000139/1977003 IR 05000139/1978002 IR 05000139/1978004 IR 05000139/1979002 IR 05000139/1979003 IR 05000139/1980002 IR 05000139/1980003 ML20054C747 ML20054C768 ML20054C771 ML20054C781 ML20054C784 ML20054C787 ML20054C792 ML20054C797
References
FOIA-81-339 50-139-78-04, 50-139-78-4, NUDOCS 8204210676
Download: ML20054C799 (4)

Text

_

'

.

-

.

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMK 10N 0FFICS OF INSPECIION AND ENFORCt. MENT

'

,

.

REGION V

,

'Raport No. 50-139/78-04 (IE-V-246)

Docket No. _50-139 License No.

R-73 Safeguards Group 2 Licensee:

University of Washington College of Engineering, 369 Loew Hall, FH-10,

-

__ Seattle, Washington 98195 Fccility Name:

Inspection at: Seattle, Washington Inspection conducted:

July 6, 1978 7 !/4 b Inspectors:

A m

W. P.41ortensen Physical Protection Inspector

' Date Signed Date Signed

~~

Date Signed Approved By: /X/

/~ _

/

~7 / /4 [*7 L. R."Kogferk'auW ys Branf.h

' Da'te Signed Sur::: nary:

Announced Inspection on July 6,1978 (Report No. 50-139/78-04)(IE-V-246)

Areas Inspected _:

Security plan; protection of SNM; security organization; access control; alarm system; surveillance; communications; protection against radiological sabotage; keys, locks and combinations; procedures; and security program review.

The inspection was started during regular hours and involved six inspector hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Resul ts:

Of the eleven areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified

-rg yg_Jg Q,_-- p.

,

f 6 8204210676 811110 L

1-399 PDR RV Form 219 (2)

-_. - - -

-

• W kh$5$f3

.

,

,

.

_

,

~

DETAILS

,-

-

_ r__ _

l.

Persons Contacted

• Professor W. Chalk, Director, Nuclear Engineering Laboratories

• Mr. W. Miller, Assistant Director for Reactor Operations Mr. C. Carrier, Assistant Director for Facilities Engineering Mr. M. Shanahan, Chief, University Police Department Mr. A. Stearns. Deputy Chief, University Police Department

• Denotes those present at exit interview.

2.

Security Plan The security plan submitted by letter dated, June 8,1976, was approved by the Division of Operating Reactors NRR on September 28, 1976, and constitutes the approved security plan.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

3.

Protection of SNM

!

The inspector determined through interview the amount of SNM I

possessed by the licensee and the principle storage locations.

The licensee has installed hardware and procedures to protect SNM from theft or diversion.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

4.

Security Organization The in' pector determined that the licensee's security organization s

is as described in the licensee's approved security plan.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

5.

Access Control The inspector examined the licensee's program for control of access to the reactor building.

All exterior openings were secured and the licensee appears to be in compliance with their approved security

,

plan.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

6.

Alarm System The inspector determined the licensee has not been required to

~-

have,[__ f

~ ^

~.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

_

_

...

,

,

.

.

-

-

-2-

.

f

!

-

+

7.

Keys, Locks, and Combinations The inspector examined the licensee's procedure and methods of

'

control for keys and locks, and found they appeared to be in com-pliance with the licensee's approved security plan.

l No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

!

8.

Communications Communications procedures and ' equipment were examined by the inspector for compliance with the approved security plan.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

9.

Surveillance The inspector examined the licensee's procedures and practices for surveillance of the reactor security areas, barriers and avenues of approach.

Due to the large amount of glass incorporated in the reactor building, reactor operating personnel have better than normal visability of security areas and the vicinity.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

10.

procedures The licensee is maintaining those procedures committed to in their approved security plan.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.

11.

Security Program Review The licensee stated that they reviewed their security program in the second half of 1977, and the review resulted in no changes to the security program.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.

--

-

.

w

.

-

,,.... -

.

-

..

.

-3-

.

.

.

.

12.

Protection Against Radiological Sabotage The inspector determined the licensee is in apparent compliance

-

with those portions of the approved security plan designed to prevent an unauthorized intrusion into the reactor facility.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

13.

Exit Interview On July 6, 1978, the inspector met with those individuals indicated in Paragraph 1.

The inspector outlined the scope of the inspection and stated no items of noncompliance or deviations had been identified.

!

l l

l l

l t

.