IR 05000213/1988021

Physical Security Insp Repts 50-213/88-21,50-245/88-22, 50-336/88-25 & 50-423/88-21 on 881017-21.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Safeguards Info Program - Corporate Ofcs

ML20206L905
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone, Haddam Neck, 05000000
Issue date:	11/15/1988
From:	Cameron D, Keimig R, Lancaster W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19064A390	List: IR 05000213/1988021
References
50-213-88-21, 50-245-88-22, 50-336-88-25, 50-423-88-21, NUDOCS 8811300298
Download: ML20206L905 (4)

Text

__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

., .

. .

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /88-21 W 245/88-22 50-336/88-26 66T423/88-21 Docket N $0-24S 50-3M 50-42)

License N OPR-61 DFRT2 1 0)RT65 N # !41 Licensee: Connecticut Yantee Atomic Power Company _and Northeast Nuclear Enegy Company

. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Facility Name: Haddam Neck Nuclear Pe er Plant and Northeast Nu N ar Energy Ccmpany (Millstone Unit Nos.1 2 and 3)

Inspection At: Haddam Neck and Berlin, Connecticut insoection Conducted: Octcher l'-J! 1958 Type of Inspection: Routineg Unannounced Phy_sical Security inspection Inspectors:

W. tcaster, PF ,ica

/ b //-date/[M[

e y ity inspector

.$. # ./ buy f is . Ca 'ron, Phy -' af scurity Inspector- date

/ ,-0 ~ ~ ,T'

! Approved by: ,- 7 .

_

jj- /6/[

j_icnardR.Kein , CM F a_feguards date

,' Section, DRSS Inspe_eti.on Sumary: l'nannounced _t Phys ical Securi ty_In spection _on_

October 17-21a_1988_(Combifed 50-213/63-21,_50-245/65-22, b0-336/85-25and50-423/85-21}_ReportNo Arealnsp_ected: Safeguards Information Program - Corporate Of fices (Millstone Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Haddam Neck Nuclear Pcwer Plant) and at the Haddam Ne-k Nuclear Fower Plan Results: The licensee was fcund to be in co pliance with NRC requirements in the ar s a inspected, iEJ130a;;3 h

~ a t i 1,

, DOC K O SO. <,; ; . ,

F,t

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

. _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _______ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - -_

.c .

. .

-

N

i DETAILS

, Key Persons Contacted i Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Com.tany (CY) and Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNfCo)

i

,

• 0. Miller, Station Superintendent, CY r

• E. DeBarba, Station Se: vices Superintendent, CY i

• P. Jewett, Static,a Security Coordinator, CY l 0. Nordquist Director, Quality Services, NNEC l L. Davison, Director, Design and Engineering Services, NNEC i

, D. Davenport, Manager, Generation Facilities Records, NNEC !

I A. Ford, Manager, S.curity Services, NNEC !

A. Roby, Manager, r neration Electrical Engineering, NNEC i J E. Perkins, Senior Engineer, Licensing, NNEC *G. Hallberg, Manager, Nuclear Security. NNEc )

"R. Gill, Station Security Supervisor, CY R. Mozdziesz, Associate Security Agent, hNEco, ,

'

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission._(NRC)  !

i

• A. Asars, Resident Inspector  !

[

• Initcates those present at the exit intery;e !

!

The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and ecmbers of the contract security force l i Safeguards Infornation program j Northeast Utilities Service __ Company Offices _, Berlin, Connecticut The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corporate procedures j (NEO 2.12, 2.13 and 5,03) and records, interviewed personnel, and  !

inspected Safeguards Information (SGI) repositories for the Nuclear  !

Engineering and Oper.tions, Nuclear Security Design and Engineering i Services, Generation Facilities Records, Generation Electrical l Engineering, and Licer sing groups to determine shether the Itcensee's l corporate program for the protection of SGI meets the requirements of >

10 CFR 73.21. The inspectors' review encompassed the types of j infctmation being protected, phys cal protection (in-use and F in-s:orage), markings, access, external transmissions and auto-atir i data processing system l

No diss.epancies were identifie ___. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . ____ _

.. .

j . ,

,

A

4

,

b. Haddam Neck Nucloar power Plant l The inspectors reviewad the licensee's plant procedure (ADM 1.1-78)

and records, interviewed personnel, and inspected SGI repositories in

{ the Security Shift Supervisors Office, Security Supervisors'0ffice,

Security Force Training Area, Nuclear Records Area, Instrument and j Controls Area, Engineering Area, Central Alarm Station (CAS),

Secondary Alarm Station (SAS), Security Force Lieutenants'0ffice.

0 Administration Buildiny, and the Control Room to determine if tha i licensee's site program for the protect;on of SGI meets the require-

! ments of 10 CFR 73,21. Thw inspectors' site review encompassed the types of information being protected, physical protection (in-use and in storage), markings, a. cess, destruction, external transmissions and automatic data processing systems, The following discrepancier were identified:

1) During a physical inspection of SGI stored in the N. clear Records Area located on the first floor of the Administrative Building (located in the owner-controlled area), the inspectors found that prints containing SGI were being stored in an unlocked metal file cabinet drawcr located within the Nuclear Records Area Vault. This appeared to conflict with both ADM 1.1-78 (Sections Nos. 6.4 and 7.6.1) and NEO 2.12 (Section Nos 4.7 and 6.7). The inspectors determined that all individuals wno were auth^rized access into the Nuclear Records Area Vault were authorized access to SGI; however, not all would have had a specific "need-to-know" the information contained on the print Therefore, the prints should have been stored in a locked cabinet. The inspectors brought th s discrepancy to the licensee's attention. The licensee stated that these print * had teen overlooked in the implementation of the SGI program. The inspectors noted that the Nuclear Recu ds Area Vault meets the American National Standards Institute ( ANS!) requirements for a nuclear industry records vault (part of which is controlling access of personnel an1 preventing unauthorized access through

• he use of physical security measures). Also, the vault remains

'd at all tires except for official use by SGI cleared ee Therefore, the safeguards significance of the epancy was ninimal, licensee took imTediate corrective action by moving the prints to a locked metal file cabinet drawer (SGI repository),

located within the vault. The licensee initiated long-term corrective action to have a locking bar and combination padlock installed on the previous storage container. The inspectors determined that the licensee's actions were appropriat ) The inspectors also found SGI, in the form of 11 Microfilm tspes, being stored in three unlocked metal storage esbinets in the Nuclear Records Area, but not in the vault. The inspectors

_

--_ _ _ _ . _ _ ______ _ _ ___ -- -

... .  !

..., ,

.

l

exp ussed the same concern regarding the microfilm as they did !

with the print The licensee took immediate corrective action !

j by mos og the microfilm to an $GI repository located within t,he !

i Nuclear Records Area Vault and initiated long-term corrective (

.

action to require the microfilm to be permanently stored in an j i

SGI repository within the Nuclear Records Area. The inspectors [

determined thst access to the Nuclear Records Area was [

,

controlled by an SGI cleared employee during normal working  !

hours, and was locked and latrolled by security officers during I

! off shifts to prevent unauthorized access. The potential for L

! unauthorized access to the microfilm was considered minimal by !

I the inspectors considering the safecuards being implemented by i

the licensee. The inspectors found that the licensee's

! corrective actions were appropriate, f Exit Interview i i t The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragrrph 1 i f at the conclusion of the inspection on October 21, 1988. At that tira, i

the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings  !

're presente l t

/t n> time during this inspection was written material provided to [

.he sicensee by the inspector, i

.

j l

!, ,

,

s

'

i

) i I

i

' l i

!

.

, ,

i i

i  !

I i l I i

I i  !

) i

._ . .- _ _ _ _ _ _ ____________- ___--___ - _