ML20054C784
| ML20054C784 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, 05000139 |
| Issue date: | 05/25/1976 |
| From: | Rizzolo V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Roy G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323G049 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-81-339 NUDOCS 8204210642 | |
| Download: ML20054C784 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000139/1976001
Text
9
e
.
.
.
UNITED STATES
g g CQPT
NUCLEAR REGULATORY cot.it.11sslON
REGION V
SUITE 202. WALNUT CREEK PLAZA
1990 N. C ALIFORNI A BOULEVARD
WALNUT CREEK, C ALIFORNI A 94596
MAY 251916
G. W. Roy, Chief, Field Coordination and Enforcement Branch
Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Headquarters
UtiIVERSITY OF WASHIriGT0ft
DOCKET T10. 50-139
'
.
.
Enclosed is the report of the special physical security inspection
conducted on April 26 and 27, 1976 for the above facility.
The following weaknesses and vulnerability were noted during the
inspection:
.
1.
Security Systems
The reactor is enclosed in a two story "high hay".
The walls
on the second level (which is at ground level on one side) are
entirely of glass.
Access doors to both the glass enclosed
control room on the second level and to the lower level equip-
ment bays have glass panels. l
-
-
~ ~ ~
l
l
l
t
2.
Access Control
The key control and accounting system,. upgraded upon completion
of the re-keying effort for all security doors, was reviewed
and appeared to be consistent with Regulatory Guide 5.12.
However, the removable cores from security padlocks used both
within and outside the building to secure essential equipment
were not being afforded a commensurate level of protection.
The licensee took measures to incorporate those cores into his
control system prior to completion of the inspection.
M~
w
__
m
. Net
~ 01 '
LUTso
-n
'
d'
. .
. ,;
% C
8204210642 811110
[
-
<
PDLLOCK81-399
.
.
.
'
.
G. W. Roy, Chief, IC&EB
-2-
ny 2 5 W6
~
(University of Washington
DN 50-139)
.
3.
Surveillance
On the south side of the Nuclear Reactor Building two stacks
of brick obscure the emergency exit and the ventilation grill
from view of the periodic security patrol.
The licensee indi-
cated that the bricks would be relocated.
.
4.
Procedures
The written procedures for response to a. bomb threat while
describing the actions of the campus police did not provide
guidance for reactor operating personnel nor for the person
receiving the threat.
The licensee agreed to expand upon
their procedure drawing upon the expertise of the University
l
Police Department.
--
i
!
!
-
..
l
V. N. Ri
o, Chief
l
Safeguards Branch
.
1
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report No.
50-139/76-01 (IE-V-125)
.