IR 05000295/1985035
| ML20133H101 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron, Zion, LaSalle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/04/1985 |
| From: | Brown G, Kers L, Phillips M, Matthew Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133H062 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-295-85-35-MM, 50-304-85-37, 50-373-85-31, 50-374-85-32, 50-454-85-41, 50-455-85-29, NUDOCS 8510160270 | |
| Download: ML20133H101 (2) | |
Text
-
.
- _.
__.
. _ _.
_
-
- _ - - _-
. -
.
. -.
.
.
-
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report Nos. 50-295/85035(DRSS); 50-304/85037(DRSS); 50-373/85031(ORSS);
50-374/85032(DRSS); 50-454/85041(DRSS); and 50-455/85029(DRSS)
Docket Nos. 50-295; 50-304; 50-373 License Nos. DPR-39; DPR-48; NPF-11; 50-374; 50-454; and 50-455 NPF-18; NPF-37; and CPPR-131 Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Names: Zion, Units 1 and 2; LaSalle, Units 1 and 2; and Byron, Units 1 and 2 Meeting At:
Region III Office, Glen Ellyn, IL Meeting Conducted:
September 20, 1985 Meeting Participant:
G. A. Brown l#
$
'
Date Yl}> Y
'L'. L. Yers
/0hf6 Date '
f flw %\\.
>$l{
M.J.Smity
/0/V Date
,
./-
'
Approved By:
. P. Phil ps,Cilief
/s/Y![I
,
Emergency Preparedness Section Date i
i Meeting Summary i
Meeting on September 20, 1985 (Reports No. 50-295/85035; 50-304/85037;
'
50-373/85031; 50-374/85032; 50-454/85041; and 50-455/85029(DRSS))
i Areas Discussed:
A special meeting was conducted to discuss various items related to exercise scheduling for LaSalle, Byron and Zion for the 1986 exercises.
The meeting involved 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> by five NRC representatives.
i
>
l pu2nautBu8lk G
i l
.. _.,
_
._
-
-. _. -. _ _
_
. _
_
s..
., _ - _.. _,, _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ - - _ _,
_
.*
,
DETAILS 1.
Meeting Attendees Comonwealth Edison Company T..Blackmon, Emergency Planning Supervisor Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III W. D. Shafer, Chief, Energency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch M. P. Phillips, Chief, Emergency Preparedness Section G. A. Brown, Energency Preparedness Analyst L. L. Kers, Energency Response Coordinator M. J. Smith, Emergency Preparedness Specialist 2.
Meeting Details This meeting was held at the request of Mr. Blackmon to discuss the exercise dates and type of exercise for the Byron and Zion exercises in 1986.
It was agreed that the Byron and Zion exercises would be unannounced, and that the CCC would probably not be activated for all exercises in 1986. Logistical arrangements were discussed, and the licensee representative agreed to provide training for NRC observers of the Zion exercise on the Friday following the Braidwood exercise in 1985. Zion badging would be completed at the Dresden Station. The starting times for the exercises were also discussed and agreed to.
NRC personnel were concerned over the possibility of senior licensee management's cancelling the exercise just before it were to begin.
It was agreed that if the exercise were not held on its originally scheduled date, it would be conducted as an announced exercise on another date during the same week.
I j
Mr. Blackmon was concerned about one of the repeat exercise weaknesses referenced in the violation issued to LaSalle for the 1985 exercise.
In
i that example, the corrective action proposed by the licensee in response l
to the 1984 weakness was not due to be completed by the 1985 exercise.
NRC representatives indicated that that example should not have been
!
included in the violation; however, the licensee was put on notice that any future corrective actions resulting from a site's exercise must at least be completed by the next exercise for that station.
The final issue discussed involved full NRC participation (Headquarters,
'
Base and Site Teens) at the LaSalle exercise, during which both the NRC and the licensee would be evaluated by NRC evaluators. NRC represent-i atives indicated that this exercise would involve real time deployment
{
of the Site Team, and that NRC would be actively involved in the scenario l
development process to ensure that NRC objectives to be tested during the exercise would be supported by the scenario.
l l
i
i I,
'