IR 05000139/1980002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-139/80-02 & 70-0115/80-01 on 800414-15.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Control & Accounting of SNM in Research Reactor Programs
ML20049A253
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, 05000139, 07000115
Issue date: 05/02/1980
From: Hamada G, Norderhaug L, Wieder A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML19323G049 List:
References
FOIA-81-339 50-139-80-02, 50-139-80-2, 70-0115-80-01, 70-115-80-1, NUDOCS 8005300301
Download: ML20049A253 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _

.

-

.

m-.

(, e---^

~

~~~. L l } _ " ~C 4

-

U.S. fiUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF If45pECTI0ft AfiD E.'lFORCEMENT

.

Region V

.

50-139/80-02 Report flo.

70-115/80-01 50-139/60-02 R-73 Docket flo.

70-115/80-01 License flo.

SitM-108 Safeguards Group

Licensee:

University of Washington College of Engineering Seattle, Washington 98105 Facility flame:

Inspection at:

Inspection Conducted:

April 14-15, 1980 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection Visit:

January 9-10, 1978 Type of Inspection:

Material Control and Accounting Inspectors:

da z w.

L-

.

/b 9 /fo G. Ham

.S

'

icia /Che 'st Date Signed hWSC

%

x1 e

d

/A'. st'e'dd'r, IAu'ditor

/

'Date Signed L. R. iyroe'rndug P Chief,

_

bf k ?d *

Approved by:

~

.L

// /

/[c,

'

ranch Date' Signed Inspection Summary:

Inspection on April 14-15, 1980 (Report flo. 50-139/80-02, 70-115/80-01 (IE-V-382)

Areas Inspected:

The licensee was inspected for compliance with applicable regulations pertaining to the control and accounting of special nuclear material in research reactor programs.

Functional areas inspected included Facility

,

l Organization and Operation, Measurement and Controls, Storage and Internal Control Inventory, and Records and Reports. The inspection involved 13 inspector hours onsite by two fiRC inspectors.

Results:

fio items of noncompliance were identified in any of the areas inspected.

l l

{

'

.

.

.

GG

,

.'

W

=f'

~k+"

.

.

q&^ $

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted

  • Professor W. Chalk, Director, fluclear En'gineering Laboratory
  • W. P. Miller, Associate Director, Reactor Operations
  • Denotes those present at Exit Interview 2.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings flo items of noncompliance were identified during the previous inspection (Report tio. 70-115/78-01, 50-139/78-02).

3.

Exit Interview The results of the inspection were discussed with licensee personnel identified in paragraph 1.

  • 4.

Unresolved Items ilo unresolved items were identified during the lust inspection.

5.

Facility Organization and Operation With minor exceptions, the facility organization remains basically

l the same.

Facility operation has been consistent with the limits l

authorized for possession and use of special nuclear material (SitM).

I fio items of noncompliance were identified.

6.

Measurements and Controls The inspection consisted of a review of Stim depletion and production data and the reporting of these data in the Material Status Reports.

flo items of noncompliance were identified.

-

s

--

7.

Storage and Internal Control Inventory records maintained for in-reactor and storage were reviewed, tio items of noncompliance were identified.

.

8.

Inventory An inventory of stored fresh fuel plates by serial number and scrap by item number was conducted.

Spent fuel bundles were identified only visually from a distance and accepted on the basis of their activity as indicated by a survey meter.

Plutonium-beryllium sources were identified by serial number. The core content was accepted on the basis of a fuel bundle location chart.

.

t{o items of noncompliance were identified.

.

- -

'

'

,"

-2-

-

...

s V

.

9.

Records and Reports The semiannual fluclear Material Status Reports (NRC-742) and the fluclear Material Transaction Reports (flRC-741) for the period October 1,1977 through September 30, 1979 were reviewed and evaluated against the record keeping and SNM report requirements l

of the regulations.

\\

-

tio items of noncompliance were identified.

.

l

.

l

-

s

-..

.

.

e t