ML20246H466

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:57, 31 January 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-298/89-06 on 890206-10 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program Including,Mgt Support,Security Program Plan & Audits & Protected Area Physical Barriers
ML20246H466
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/1989
From: Earnest A, Everett R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20246H464 List:
References
50-298-89-06, 50-298-89-6, NUDOCS 8903200210
Download: ML20246H466 (1)


See also: IR 05000298/1989006

Text

__ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -

. 14

4

.. .

, . . ..

  • '

APPENDIX

~U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~.

REGION IV -

NRC Inspection Report: 50-298/89-06 Operating License: DPR-46

Docket: 50-298

Licensee: Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)

P.O. Box 499 ~ j-

Columbus, NE 68602-0499 L.

Facility Name: Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) .

Inspection At: CNS, Brownsville, Nebraska

Inspection Conducted: February 6-10, 1989 -

Inspector:

A. B. Earnest, Security Specialist Date

Security and Emergency Preparedness Section

Approved: 14 //

R. J. Everett, " Chief / Date '

h Security and Emergency Preparedness Section

Inspection Summary

Inspection Conducted February 6-10, 1989 (Report 50-298/89-06)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the licensee's physical .

security program. The areas inspected within the physical security program

included management support, security program plan, and audits; protected

area (PA) physical barriers, detection and assessment aids; protected and vital g

area (VA) access control of personnel, packages, and vehicles; alarm

stations and communications; and compensatory measures.

Results: Within the areas inspected three apparent violations were identified ,.

(inadequate compensatory measures, inadequate lock and key control, and failure

to report; see paragraph 2). One open item is also discussed in paragraph 2.

The NRC inspector observed that if the licensee hcd reported or logged the

non-compliance items as required by 10 CFR 73.71(b) and (c) and the licensee's

Physical Security Plan (PSP), the NRC could have exercised discretion in

whether to cite non-compliance since the violations would have been relatively

minor in nature and reported by the licensee. The decisions to not report or

log non-compliance issues is a repeated problem and appears to be a programmatic

issue.

ENCLOSURE CONTAINS

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

UPON SEPARATION THIS

890320021o s90306

PDR

,

PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

O

ADock osooo29s .

PDC

- _ _ - - _ _ _ _ .__ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _