ML20215J018

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:28, 19 April 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 860929-1003.Violation Noted:Util Did Not Adequately Describe Corrective Actions Taken & Provide Sufficient Info to Permit Analysis & Evaluation of Deficiency
ML20215J018
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 04/28/1987
From: Russell W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215J008 List:
References
50-412-86-29, EA-86-190, NUDOCS 8705070191
Download: ML20215J018 (2)


Text

. . .,.

l 1

l NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Duquesne Light Company Docket No. 50-412 l Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 License No. CPPR-105 EA 86-190 I During an NRC inspection conducted between September 29 and October 3, 1986, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is set forth below

10 CFR 50.55(e) requires, in part, that the Commission be notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and with a written report within 30 days, of each deficiency in design and construction which, were it to have remained uncorrected, could have affected adversely the safety of operations at any time throughout the expected lifetime of the plant, and which represents a significant deficiency in construction which will require extensive I redesign or repair to establish the adequacy of the component to perform I its intended safety function. The written report shall include a des- J cription of the corrective actions taken and sufficient information to permit i analysis and evaluation of the deficiency. and of the corrective action.  !

Contrary to the above, Duquesne Light Company (DLC) did not adequately describe, as required by 10 CFR 50.55(e), the corrective actions taken and provide sufficient information to permit analysis and evaluation of a deficiency and of corrective action for the deficiency that, were it to have remained uncorrected, could have affected adversely the safety of operations and that required extensive repair / redesign to establish its adequacy to perform its intended safety function. Specifically:

a. On June 16, 1983, the NRC was notified by DLC that an error was identified in the Westinghouse 7300 Process Protection System involving deficient Temperature Channel Test (NTC) circuit cards at Beaver Valley 2. The final written report of the deficiencies submitted to the NRC on August 26, 1983 did not adequately describe the corrective actions in that the report stated the NTC circuit cards would be replaced. However, NTC circuit cards in safety related Balance-of-Plant applications were subsequently determined to be acceptable and NTC cards in the process protection system were subsequently modified by the installation of an additional circuit board, and the NRC was not notified of this change in corrective actions. -

8705070191 870428 2 PDR ADOCK 0500 G

l OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CP PKG BEAVER VALLEY 86-190 - 0005.0.0 04/21/87

Appendix A' 2

b. On July 25, 1984, deficiencies were identified by DLC involving 21 deficient Loop Power Supply (NLP) circuit cards in the Westinghouse 7300 Process Protection System and the Commission was not notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and a written report required to be submitted-within 30 days was not provided until March 13, 1986.

This is a Severity Level III violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duquesne Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the letter which transmitted this Notice, a written statement or explanation in. reply,-

including: (1) the reason for the violation, if admitted; (2) the corrective steps-which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending this response time.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Original Signed Bg ,

William T. Russell Regional Administrator Dated a King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, thisd/ ay of April 1987.

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CP PKG BEAVER VALLEY 86-190 - 0006.0.0 04/21/87