ML20058H297
| ML20058H297 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 12/06/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058H286 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-412-93-25, NUDOCS 9312130042 | |
| Download: ML20058H297 (1) | |
Text
,
t APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Docket No. 50-412 Duquesne Light Company License No. NPF-73 Beaver Valley, Unit 2 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 18-22,1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. Instrucdons, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
Beaver Valley, Unit 2, UFSAR, Section 17.2.5, titled " Instructions. Procedures and Drawings," implements the above requirement.
Table 1 of licensee Procedure 2 CMP-75-FISHER VLV-lM, Issue 4, Revision 0, contained in Work Request Number 003370 for valve 2CHS-LCV460B requires the 7/8" body-to-bonnu studs be torqued to 340 ft-lbs.
Contrary to the above, on April 5,1992, the 7/8" body-to-bonnet studs were torqued until the body-to-bonnet gap was metal to metal within 0.002" and not to 340 ft-lbs as required in the above procedure.
I This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
t 9312130042 931206 DR ADOCK 05000412 PDR
Appendix A 2
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duquesne Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A*ITN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the r
subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received
[
within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued J
to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
l Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania this 6th day of December 1993 l
a 6
h t
i