ML20057E832
| ML20057E832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057E829 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-412-93-22, NUDOCS 9310130210 | |
| Download: ML20057E832 (2) | |
Text
__
i ENCLOSURE 1 l
l l
l Duquesne Light Company Docket No. 50-412 Beaver Valley Power Station License No. NPF-73 l
Unit 2 l
l During an NRC inspection conducted from August 24 to September 27,199:4. a violation of i
NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement' Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1992), the-l' violation is listed below-Beaver Valley Unit 2 Technical' Specification 4.3.3.10 requires that process flow rate l
monitors for the condensate polishing building vent, the waste gas storage vault, elevated release, and the plant ventilation system be demonstrated operable by.
performance of a channel calibration at least every 18 months. Technical Specification 4.0.2 requires that each surveillance requirement be performed within the specified time interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the surveillance interval.
j Contrary to the above, the requirements of technical specifications were not satisfied as evidenced by the following examples:
(1)
The condensate polishing building vent process flow rate monitor was past due l
for calibration from April 4,1992, to September 2,1993.
l l
(2)
The waste gas storage vault process flow rate monitor was past due for l
calibration from April 22, 1992, to September 2,1993.
(3)
The elevated release process flow rate monitor was past due for calibration from February 15, 1991, to April 20,1993.
i (4)
The plant ventilation system process flow rate monitor was past due for calibration from February 17, 1991, to April 30,1993.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duquesne Light Company is herchy required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, AITN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and if applicable, a copy to the NRC Resident inspector, within 30 days of the date of receipt of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This I
reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for l
each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
-9310130210 931001 jM ADOCK O 2
e z :
this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at King of Prussia. Pennsylvania this 1st day of October 1993 1
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY