ML20235Z774

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:08, 25 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 890109-13.Violations Noted: Valve Gland Stud for Valve 2SL-V2505 Incorrectly Replaced W/Asme SA-193 Grade B8 Matl & Failure to Specify 10CFR21 Provisions Applicable for Procurement Documents
ML20235Z774
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1989
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20235Z773 List:
References
50-382-89-02, 50-382-89-2, NUDOCS 8903160231
Download: ML20235Z774 (2)


Text

--_--_ _ -

, i'

)

1 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Louisiana Power & Light Company (LP&L) Docket: 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Operating License: NPF-38 )

i During an NRC inspection conducted January 9-13, 1989, violations of NRC requirements were identified. The violations involved failure to use the I material specified on the design drawing, failure to impose 10 CFR Part 21 on a i vendor providing basic components, and failure to implement procedural j commitments. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure i for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violations i are listed below: 1 A. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the licensee's approved quality assurance program description require that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with i documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances. ]

Design Drawing 1564-1539, R26 for pressurizer surge line Sample Isolation Valve 2SL-V2505 specifies that the material for Item 11 (valve gland i studs) shall be AStiE SA-193 Grade B6 or B7.

Contrary to the above, a valve gland stud for Valve 2SL-V2505 had been ,

incorrectly replaced with ASMF SA-193 Grade B8 material. l This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplements)(382/8902-01)  !

8. Section 21.31 of 10 CFR Part 21 requires the licensee to specify on each l procurement document for a basic component that the provisions of I 10 CFR Part 21 apply, j Contrary to the above, since 1985, the licensee has not specified on procurement documents for basic components placed with the Okonite j Company, that the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 were applicable. l This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplement I) (382/8902-02)

C. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the licensee's approved l quality ossurance program description require that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to implement procedures as shown in the following examples:

Contrary to Section 5.7.7 in Procedure N0EI-152, Revision 1, the licensee failed to identify shelf life requirements in Purchase Order WP016013 for Buna-N parts.

QS3%$$

u

$0b ;f

___.___________.__._.__.__._____._____a

. l

.i .

Contrary to Section 5.4.3.2 in Procedure VNT-7-021, Revision 1, the licensee failed to update at least five vendor technical manuals to ;

incorporate data to support replacement AGASTAT relays installed j during Modification SM1701.

Contrary to Section 5.2.1.4'in Procedure UNT-8-001,'the licensee failed to properly dedicate commercial grade replacement electrical resistors which had been procured on Purchase Order W117408.

This~is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplements)(382/8902-03)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Louisiana Power & Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted,

2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved,
3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and
4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good'cause is shown, 1 consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated this egat gwArlington, Texas, M 1989 l day of </7/

l l

l l

l l

l