ML20128C979

Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/92-16 on 921026-1117.No Violations Noted.Nrc Requests That Licensee Responds within 30 Days to Unresolved Items Identified in Rept Pertaining to Inadequate Review of Safety Related Procedures to Meet Requirements

ML20128C979
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	11/30/1992
From:	Ring M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Orser W DETROIT EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20128C982	List: IR 05000341/1992016 ML20128C979
References
NUDOCS 9212070093
Download: ML20128C979 (2)

See also: IR 05000341/1992016

Text

.

4

4 4

. \

.

LOV D C DM

Docket No. 50-341

The Detroit Edison Company

ATI'N : Mr. W. S. Orser

Senior Vice President

Nuclear Generation

6400 North bixie Highway

Newport, MI 48166

Dear Mr. Oracr:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. Z4 Falevits,

T. Tella and F. Brush of this office on October 26 through

November 17, 1992. The inspection included a review of

authorized activities for your Formi 2 Nuclear Power Station. At -

the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed

with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed

report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the

report. These areas consisted primarily of a review of the-

implementation of the Fermi Power Uprate Program, and the review

of a concern regarding Fermi's instrumentation calibration

program. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a

selective examination of the power uprate modification packages,

calculations, surveillance and calibration procedures, quality

assurance audit reports, work observations and interviews with

plant personnel.

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the

course o' this inspection. However, two unresolved items were

identified in the report pertaining to inadequate review of

safety related procedures and inadequate implementation of a

procedure to trend the performance of safety related instruments,

which consistently faile/ to meet the as-found acceptance

criteria. We request that you provide a written response within

30 days of the date of this letter that addresses each of these

unresolved items. In your response, you should document the

result of your review of these items and any specific actions

taken. After reviewing your response to these items, the NRC

will determine whether additional inspection or enforcement

action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory

requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,

a copy of this letter, the enclosed inspection report, and your

response (s) to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public

Document Room.

I

9212070093 921130

PDR ADOCK 05000341

3 60\

G PDR

- - . . _ . . . . - . . . .. . _

.;

.. ..

+

The Detroit Edison Company 2

NOV 3 01992

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning'this

inspection.

Sincerely,

-

y c ,, 5 9 ,

-

s, 2

9

M. A. Ring, Chief

Engineering Branch

Enclosure: Inspection

Report No. 50-341/92016(DRS)

cc w/onclosure: . ,

D. R. Gipson, Vice Pronident,

Nuclear Operations

John A. Tibal, Supervisor of 3

Compliance

P. A..Marquardt, Corporato

Legal Department

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB

T. Colburn, LPM, NRR-

Resident Inspector, Rill

James R.-Padgett, Michigan

Public Servico Commission

Michigan. Department.of

Public-Health

Harry H. .Voighti Esq.

Monroe County Office of

civil Preparedness

bec: R. DeFayette, RIII

D. Funk,. RIII

.RIII -RIII RIII- RIJI RII

'] ) $6- 93'h' S d't ' f Ms

Tella/jk Falevits Gardner Phillipu- Ring.

11/30/92 11/30 /92 11/36/92 11/J0/92 11(?g/92

g

y. $tra

. . _