ML20128C979
| ML20128C979 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1992 |
| From: | Ring M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Orser W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128C982 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9212070093 | |
| Download: ML20128C979 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000341/1992016
Text
.
4
4
4
\\
.
.
LOV D C DM
Docket No. 50-341
The Detroit Edison Company
ATI'N :
Mr.
W.
S.
Orser
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
6400 North bixie Highway
Newport, MI
48166
Dear Mr. Oracr:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. Z4 Falevits,
T. Tella and F.
Brush of this office on October 26 through
November 17, 1992.
The inspection included a review of
authorized activities for your Formi 2 Nuclear Power Station.
At -
the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed
with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed
report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the
report.
These areas consisted primarily of a review of the-
implementation of the Fermi Power Uprate Program, and the review
of a concern regarding Fermi's instrumentation calibration
program.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a
selective examination of the power uprate modification packages,
calculations, surveillance and calibration procedures, quality
assurance audit reports, work observations and interviews with
plant personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the
course o' this inspection.
However, two unresolved items were
identified in the report pertaining to inadequate review of
safety related procedures and inadequate implementation of a
procedure to trend the performance of safety related instruments,
which consistently faile/ to meet the as-found acceptance
criteria.
We request that you provide a written response within
30 days of the date of this letter that addresses each of these
unresolved items.
In your response, you should document the
result of your review of these items and any specific actions
taken.
After reviewing your response to these items, the NRC
will determine whether additional inspection or enforcement
action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory
requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,
a copy of this letter, the enclosed inspection report, and your
response (s) to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public
Document Room.
I
9212070093 921130
ADOCK 05000341
G
60\\
3
-
-
. . _ . .
.
. -
.
. .
.. .
_
- .;
..
..
+
The Detroit Edison Company
2
NOV 3 01992
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning'this
inspection.
Sincerely,
-
y c ,, 5 9 ,
-
s,
9
2
M. A. Ring, Chief
Engineering Branch
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report No. 50-341/92016(DRS)
cc w/onclosure:
.
,
D.
R. Gipson, Vice Pronident,
Nuclear Operations
John A. Tibal, Supervisor of
3
Compliance
P. A..Marquardt, Corporato
Legal Department
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB
T.
Colburn, LPM, NRR-
Resident Inspector, Rill
James R.-Padgett, Michigan
Public Servico Commission
Michigan. Department.of
Public-Health
Harry H. .Voighti Esq.
Monroe County Office of
civil Preparedness
bec:
R.
DeFayette, RIII
D.
Funk,. RIII
.RIII
-RIII
RIII-
RIJI
RII
'] )
$6-
93'h'
S d't '
f
Ms
Tella/jk
Falevits
Gardner
Phillipu-
Ring.
11/30/92
11/30 /92
11/36/92
11/J0/92
11(?g/92
g
y.
$tra
. .
_
_
. .