ML20128D976

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:06, 8 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 850301-31 & 0401-16. Violations Noted:Failure of Maint QC to Sign Off Hold Points Incorporated Into CRD Refurbishment Procedures
ML20128D976
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/1985
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128D959 List:
References
50-267-85-07, 50-267-85-7, NUDOCS 8505290260
Download: ML20128D976 (2)


Text

%,

+

Il

[,

c ' APPENDIX A~

NOTICE OF VIOLATION i "

Public Service' Company of Colorado Docket: 50-267/85-07 l - Fort St. Vrain* . License: DPR-34 1

Based on the results 'of an NRC inspection conducted during' March 1-30 and April L1-16,11985, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy-(10 CFR:Part 2, Appendix'C), 49 FR 8583, dated March 8, 1984, the following violations were identified:

Failure to Follow Procedures

- 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, ' states, in part, that " Activities affecting quality shall. be prescribed by documented instructions, proce-dures, or. drawings, of a.. type appropriate to the circumstances and shall- be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures,' or draw-ings.." This requirement is implemented by the licensee's . Final Safety-Analysis Report, Section B.S.2, " Quality Assurance Programs."

- l '. - Maintenance Quality Control ~ Inspection Program MQCIM-1, Issue 1,-dated' January 21, 1985, requires that-inspection hold points in a' procedure -

r ,

be signed off by a maintenance quality control inspector before work' p will be allowed to continue.

I

- Contrary to the above, the NRC inspectors determined that MQC hold

- points incorporated into the control-rod-drive-refurbishment proce-dures were not signed off by QC and work was allowed to continue.

L -This is a Severity-Level IV Violation. (SupplementI.D.)

.(50-267/8507-01)

2. Fuel Handling Procedure Work Packet FHPWP-100-18, Issue 1, dated

. March 24,--1985 Task 35,'" Assemble Gear Box Housing and Gear Train,"

required. installing the second-stage duplex pair (-200-37) with the

!' relieved side of'the outer races' facing away from the housing shoul-der, and verifying .that the bearings were properly seated and required

, shims (-20g-68) installed.

bontrarytotheabove,.onApril 15, 1985, the NRC inspectors deter-mined that even though the workman had signed off the step as complete l- .and maintenance quality control had signed off the hold point verify-l ~ing step completion,sa bearing had been installed backwards. This was

!. identified during subsequent back-EMF testing when the inner and outer

!' . races separated causing the ball bearings to fall cut and the second stage gear to move toward and rub against the drum support.

L

'0505290260 850426 PDR ADOCK 05000267 G PDR o

I.. -

-This is a Severity Level IV Violation. (SupplementI.D.)

(50-267/8507-02)

3. Administrative Procedure Q-15, " Control of Nonconforming Items,"

Issue 3, dated June 23, 1982, requires for an NCR disposition involving repair, that the SQAS determine and denote on the NCR any appropriate inspections that may be requied and the organization responsible for performing such inspections, and sign the appropriate block.

Contrary to the above, on March 5, 1985, the NRC inspectors determined from a review of previously processed nonconformance reports (NCR) addressing control-rot-drive-refurbishment repairs, that the superin-tendent of QA services (SQAS) had not denoted the appropriate inspec-tions and responsible organization. The NRC inspectors were unable to identify what QC requirements were used for repairs which affect quality.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation. (Supplement I.D.)

(50-267/8507-03)

4. Administrative Procedure Q-15, " Control of Nonconforming Items,"

Issue 3, dated June 23, 1982, states that the QA/QC/MQC assigned to a department or area in which a nonconforming hardware item is identified, is responsible for initiation of a Nonconformance Report

'(NCR).

Station Service Request SSR 84500853, dated November 20, 1984, re-quired the fabrication of seven control-rod-drive-assembly shaft potentiometer drives in accordance with Drawing SLR D120-1-240, Revision B, and maintenance QC verified their conformance on MQC General Inspection Procedure, dated January 18, 1985.

Contrary to the above, on April 8,1985, the NRC inspector determined that(1)nonconformingcontrol-rod-drive-assembly-shaft-potentiometer drives had been identified and a NCR was not initiated.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation. (SupplementI.D.)

(50-267/8507-04)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Public Service Company of Colorado is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, includ-ing: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further viola-tions; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Considera-tion may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

Dated: