ML20151W623
| ML20151W623 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 04/27/1988 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151W616 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-267-88-08, 50-267-88-8, NUDOCS 8805030442 | |
| Download: ML20151W623 (2) | |
Text
_
i i
a
]
APPENDIX A i
i Public Service Company of Colorado Docket:
50-267 I
Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station Operating License:
DPR-34 i
C l
During an NRC inspection conducted on March 21-25, 1988, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
The violations involved failure to adequately
{
control drawing revisions, and failure to include or reference applicable requirements in a purchase order for helium circulator refurbishment parts.
In i
accordance with the "General Statement of Policy (and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C 1987), the violations are listed below:
l A.
Failure to Control Design Document Distribution Criterion VI of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the licensee's approved j
quality assurance plan require measures to be established which control the issuance of drawings and that these measures shall assure that the drawings and their changes are approved and distributed to the prescribed j
locations.
Issue 13 of Procedure ENG-1 requires distribution of controlled design
{
documents in accordance with the Document Distrit,ution Handbook.
This handbook further requires that all applicable controlled design documents be stamped, and the appropriate Change Notice or Document Change Notice l
numbers be inserted into the blank space.
3 Contrary to the above, the following conditions were identified:
}
1.
The latest revised drawing had not been distributed in one instance I
to any of the specifiad locations.
2.
Several instances were noted where all designated distribution locations were not updated with the latest revised drawings.
3.
Drawings with the same revision letters had different Change Notice
)
or Document Change Notice numbers entered.
1 This is a Severity Level IV violation.
(Supplement I) (267/8808-01) 8.
Failure to Specify QA Requirements in Procurement Document Criterion IV of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, "Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements, j
design bases, and other requirements wnich are necessary to assure adequate quality are suitably included or referenced in the documents for l
i procurement of material, equipment, and services, whether purchased by the i
applicant or by its contractors or subcontractors...."
1 l
i I
l BG05030442 880427 PDR ADOCK 05000267 O
1
. t Paragraph 3.1 of Administrative Procedure Manual Procedure Q-4, "Procurement System," Issue 9, Effective Date October 24, 1986, states, in part, "A procurement document shall include the technical requirements, limitations for use of the item. Quality Assurance (QA) requirements, and other requirements necessary for establishing and/or maintaining the quality of the procured material, equipment and services...."
Paragraph 3.4 of this procedure states, in part "Changes and/or revisions i
I to technical or QA requirements contained in procurement documents are accomplished by a revision to the document...." By letter, P-88019, l
Public Service Company of Colorado committed to implement these requirements in fastener procurement.
l Contrary to the above, Purchase Order N8446 dated December 4, 1987, to GA Technologies was noted on March 24, 1988, to have not been revised to include or reference applicable detailed QA requirements as comitted to in the Public Service Company of Colorado letter P-88019 dated i
Janua ry 22, 1988.
This is a Severity Levei IV violation.
(SupplementI)(267/8808-02)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Public Service Company of Colorado is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Arlington, Texas, this,2 7th day of dib 1988.
l
.