IR 05000267/1989006
| ML20247A034 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 04/24/1989 |
| From: | Everett R, Joseph Kelly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246Q322 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-267-89-06, 50-267-89-6, NUDOCS 8905230014 | |
| Download: ML20247A034 (1) | |
Text
-_
_ - _.
-__
L. * W.
I i. ;
.
APPENDIX B U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
!
NRC Inspection Report:
50-267/89-06 Operating License: DRP-34 Docket:
50-267 l
Licensee:
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC)
P.O. Box 840 L
Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Facility Name:
Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station (FSV)
Inspection At:
FSV, Platteville, Colorado Inspection Conducted: March 13-17, 1989 Inspector; be?[ k J. A. F. Kelly, Senior Sec ity Inspector Date 4 (decdrityandEmergencyPreprednessSection I
.
Approved:
/d M/tt?//
/ 2 M h/
R. J. Everett,' Chief./ ecurity and Emergency ate '
q S
p Preparedness Sectich
-
Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted March 13-17, 1989 (Report 50-267/89-06)
l Areat Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of the licensee's physical security program., The areas inspected withir, the physical security program
.
included managcraent support and security program plan; protected and vital area (VA) oarriers, detection and assessment aids; orotected and VA acces'.,
control of perscnnel, packages, and vehicles; alarm stations and
,
communications; and testing, maintenance, and comperaatory.measuret.
)
i Results: Within the program areas inspected, one violction was identified (inadequate access control - personnel, paragraph 3).
During this inspection period, the licensee experienced one reportable event I
(LER 267/89-501) as discussed in carag'.eph 2.
Based on a reviev cy the NRC
inspector, LER 267/89-501 was converted to Violation 267/8906-01.
i
I:nmediate corrective action was taken with regard to Violation 267/8906-01, hewever, the root cause of the problem was not addressed. The NRC insoector j
determined that the violation occurred because of several failures to follow an
]
existing security procedure.
In addition, implementation of the procedure J
-
was not reviewed in sufficient detail to recognize the need for revision of that procedure, associated pr g g g g porting hardware, gp2ggggggggg267 l
'
'
'
g PNV UP N SEPAyRA,THIS j
.
,