IR 05000400/1983020

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:49, 2 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 830610 Exit Meeting for Insp Repts 50-400/83-20 & 50-401/83-20.Major Areas Discussed:Previously Unresolved Item Re Ground Areas on Pipe Support Areas/Restraint & post-weld Heat for Turbine Steel
ML20134G103
Person / Time
Site: Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/10/1983
From:
NRC
To:
NRC
Shared Package
ML20132C567 List:
References
FOIA-85-173 NUDOCS 8508230037
Download: ML20134G103 (4)


Text

-

.

.

-

% '

$ O (0 #

N NRC EXIT MEETING June io, 1983

  • 'k

'

i

!

400/401/83-20 g Attendees: wD# i Mr. G. M. Simpson, Principal CI Specialist Mr. F. R. Haney, Senior Construction Specialist Mr. D. C. Whitehead, QA Supervisor - Surveillance Mr. A. Fuller, Principal Engineer - Mechanical Mr. E. E. Willett, Resident Engineer - Mechanical  ;

Mr. G. L. Forehand, Director - QA/QC j Mr. M. F. Thompson, Jr., Senior Resident Engineer '

Mr. R. M. Parsons, Project General Manager M N. J. Chiang1, Mana g e r - C A /0 C - Ha r r u P'.1r. :

Mr. D. A. McCaw, Superintendent - QA Mr. M. D. Vernon, Superintendent - QC

Mr. E. B. Isom, Construction Manager - Daniel i Mr. J. Pardi, Daniel General Manager .

'

Mr. P. F. Foscolo, Assistent General Project Manager  :

i NRC .

h Mr. R. Prevatte, SRIC i

Mr. P. Benis, USNRC Section'Chisf *

Mr. G. F. Maxwell. USNRC Sr. Ops. n Mr. J. W. York. USNRC, Sr. Mech / Weld Engineer i

The meeting was conducted by Mr. J. W. York, NRC, sb.s ad"is ad bc Icoked into three areas:

Previously identified items Post-weld heat treatment on structural steel Banger Inspection Program l

Previously Unresolved Items CLOSED Unresolved 1800/83-05-01 Ground Areas on Pipe Support Areas / Restraint No. 1-SW-H-376. Wt sure at that time you had minimum wall requirement l Sine- -he- vcu have cone ultrasenic tests and ver:flec it is not un d e r r.:. n =u- '

-C 1 re:4 ~- ents 8508230037 850814 f(;3 PDR FOIA GUILD 85-173 PDR-continued-hQ

_ - - _ _

_ _ - ,_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.. .

.

O

.

  1. 9% NhC Exit Meeting June 10, 1983 -

Prie Tuo Post .'el: Heat.- Tarc.ne Steel Checked for tnree welds on tower restraint for locp 1 - in varicus stages (one complete. one in process of being post-weld heat treated and one getting ready for setting insulation) - no proble Hanger Inspection Preeram Reinspected 10 hangers in Phase 1 (various stages); which means hanger may not have been totally inspected. Looked at these 10 and another one with weld inspect _cn pec:le (visual; fillet size; length, etc.). Had probler.s on three nangers which will be icentified as violation 400/63-20-01 fFac.cre to foll procedure for Hanger Inspection).

CS 2457,-

In this particular case there was a plate welded to the embedmen ll Tubular steel was welded to the plat Looking back throu6h the j, paperwork there was a change (2-3 times). This plate and the i,

'

material was not a vendor package type but had been field issue The installed plate was 4' x 4" x .5/8*. It had been initially  ;

requisitioned as 4" x 4" x 1/2". When the drawing was issued it was drawn as 5" x 5" x 5/8=. The CI inspector inspected to the drawing and did not viatch'tO~ varianc RB 165 In this case there is a tubular steel welded to the embedment on the end of which is a clip to which you intend to attach a snubber.

'

This clip, according to Bergen-Paterson catalog, is not to be used l on the end where the snubber attachment is made. This is the wrong catalog number for the intended use. There is a slight dimensional dit.ference between this clip and the one that is supposed *.o be used. Dimensions. where snubber fits - 1/16" difference (staller).

All other dimensions are the sam had -continued-

.

-

.

-

r's

. .

.

jJ NRC Exit Meeting )

gg June 10, 1983 Page Three n

Hanger 9 29 Safety Injection System - tubular steel (box type hanger, safety injection piping - from the tubular steel you have a brace that runs over from embed. Brace had been called to be 6" x 4" x 1/2" (in

thickness). It was 6" x 4" x 3/8". This particular piece was requisitioned t ros another hanger. CHR proves component from other hanger did nave 1/2" thickness on tubular steel. According to that package you should have put that particular part i However, marked on the hanger is another hanger number; that is marked through; another hanger number is marked on the hange- and that j nanger number is marked through and SI-H29 nas been 21-ked or i Mr. York expressed concsen that CI inspector did not pick this up as it was signed off. He wondered about material control on taese hanger Will probably, in the fu ture , take a look and see if you have material control problem Mr. Parsons asked Mr. Fuller regarding the 1/16" difference, could tne snubber Q have gone in and Mr. Fuller noted be did not think so. He Tu-ther stated at that poit.t the inspection program did not provide enough informatior that g

i catalog pieces matched. It is now t obeckpoint. This barger eas inspected .l

'

two years ago. Mr . Willett advised 'that this is what promoted us to make ,

procedure chang !

. il Pr. Parsons noted we have found 50 different items that need te de checked on Phase II as we want through the last 3 4 year Mr. York advised there was another , clip hanging down and the clip had been f visibly bent. Will probably leave this out. This was signed off by a field :)

enginee In early Phase I this was allowed. Mr. Parsons cons:ented we do not 'l allow it if they see it. Mr. York noted the probles is, did be see it at the time it occurred or did it happen after he was there' There is a ci- ,haough this and a long member is hanging down from i Mr. Parsons reitereated it is a fine point bere. We need to support the inspectors and you could almost reverse intimidatior if you held them responsible fc- deficiencies noted after the insper'i.on is coet;eted It is our aesDoce!' 'ity to make sure the system in the r< Oatcher :arap .

.

-continued-N

. . _ . _- . . .- .

--. .

. - . .

.

. .

.

.

-,

.c NRC Exit Meeting June 10, 1983 Page Four Mr. York advised he walked through the receipt area and area wnere :.acerials are issued in the plant itself. The area was closed but he could see che case where the material is issued. Mr. Parsons noted these materials are surplus hangers and instead of scrapping them we use some pieces to modify other hanger i i

i t

.

.

.

O h

.

N e

e

, . , . , _ _ , , _ - - _ _ _ - ,