ML20134G069
| ML20134G069 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/1984 |
| From: | Van Vo C AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Robinson L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132C567 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-173 NUDOCS 8508230007 | |
| Download: ML20134G069 (20) | |
Text
.
'D
/) {\\
.4 November 24,1984 Mr. Larry L. Robinson Office of Investigation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street,N.W.
Atlanta,GA 30323
Dear Mr. Robinson:
Thank you for youe letter on November 14,1984 with i
the attached of a copy of the Transcript of the 4
meeting with you in Raleigh, North Carolina on November 1,1964 After review the facts in the Transcript.in that I found large misunderstanding causes my English pronounciation.
Therefore,please find the attached are 19 page of corree-tiens for the subject meeting prepared by me.
I am also enclosing the copies of 36 pages of DDR No.1875 for the weld deficiencies,and DR No. M-403 with the PO-h-40924 for your information.
I you need for any further information.please write to me.I will be happy to provide it.
Sincerely, 0 ft cC? b u M % % >
Chan Van Vo 8508230007 850814 "i
%\\\\l3 EXHlBIT (O ng,_.J__of_!S.Pages
Pa y I ef Iq CORRECTION ON PAGE 6 Prom line 15 to line 19.
MR.
V0:
Objection,I have one objection,that is NRC' Attorney Mr. Charles Barth said -, due to telephone interview with the Raleigh News and Observer'WE ARE PRESENTLY CHECKING OU VAN VO VERY VARREPULLY" In my opinion he would do well to check out CP&L and Dniel Construction Contractor. I don't know what kind of relation between CP&L and him made he said that.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 7 From line No 3 through line No. 5 MR.
V0 s-No,I would like to feed back in here by giving to you my recommendations and promotions as a part of evidences.
From line No. 12. to line No 13 MR.
V0 Yeah,because these recommendations and promotions will prove my performance in the past to the present in comparison with CP&L's probationary status,and the temination my job due to poor performance.
CCRRECTION ON PAGE 8 From line 15 to line 17 MR.
Voi Yeah, recommendations and promotions are as a part of evidneces,in which I think will show that CP&L 's really contraditional theirself of what they are mentioned on my probationary status.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 12 From line 16 through line 21 MR.
V0:
F would like to point out is that in June,1983, refer to NRC Meeting No.400-41-83-20 was issued on june 10, 1983,in which inchludes hand notes of Mr. John York, NRC's Commissioner at Harris Site. Refer to that Alex Puller my direct supervisor assigned me to work with the CP&L's CA Surveillance Group to perform the in-vestigation on the seismic-hangers are built at Harris site.Alex Puller gave to mo his hand note that I have concentrated on random selecting 50 hanger packages phase I and phase II completions.
i i
u 6
EXHistT W Page 3-I"u mes l
a IbF E *f' ' T CORRECTION ON PAGE 13 Prom line No 10 to line No 11 MR.
V0:
I really don't know how they can issued to the field materials reflected to the P.O. No. 21022 before and after voided.I only found these problems until july, 1983 due to perform the investigation on the seismic asbuilt hangers with the QA Surveillance Group.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 13 AND DAGE ik From line 15 through line 22 of page 13,and
? rom line No. 1 to line No. 2 of page 14 MR.
V0:
Mr. Alex ?uller introduced me to Mr. Buck Williams CP&L's QA engineer was Supervisor QA Surveillance Group that I have to work with them.
Refer to Mr Alex Puller hand noted that I have to pull out from the files 50 hanger packages phase I pnd II to investigate.But Mr. Buck Williams didn't agreed with Alex Fuller he asked me to pull out 50 packages are completed phase II inspection,then his people.will select from there.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 14 From line No. 6 to line No. 7 MR.
V0:
Mr. Buck Williams and his people selected them.
From line No. 10 to line No.11 MR.
V0:
By random selection they picked out 12 packages from 50.
CORRECTION ON pAGE 14 AND PAGE 15 From line No.16 through line No 22 of page 14.and line No. 1 of page 15 MR.
VO And then we started to investigate 12 seismic hanger packages just selected by Mr. Williams's Group. At that 1
time my duty is responsible to help Mr. Williams's Group to identify location of each hanger,also if possible I will prevail case by case basis with QA 's inspector if the deficiencies raised up by them are not fairly.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 15 Prom line No 3 through line No.19.
MR. YO Due to the investigation,I have nothing to prevall,because any deficiencies raied up by them are properly ?inally, with the CA's -deficiencies noted giving to ne by Mr.
Williams Group I prepared the Office report to *.my mana-gerent ( Mr. Willett and Fuller) that contains all deficiencies I found and QA's deficiencies noted.
EXHIBIT W Page.5-- CI
- - - - - - - - ~ ~
by 3 of /f CORRECTION ON PAGE 15 Prom line No. 13 to line No 14 KR.
V0:
Yes, we performed investigation together.If I am not apeed with the defluiencies found by them.I will prevail with them in case by case basis.
^
CORRECTION ON PAGE 18 Prom line No. 3 through line No.18.
-l MR. V0:
I really don't know sir.
i Like I said before,the time they issued materials reflected on PO 21022,I wasn't in teir group. At that time I was piping Associate Engineer,my duty is deal
[
with pipe and valves installation until Aoril 1984 I was transferred to work with Fuller.
(
And due to reinvestigation of the asbuilt hangers, I just found these problems in Jyly,1983.
I i
1 1
EXHIBIT (1) M
~
Page A of Petes
R3ps s;r y/q CORRECTION ON PAGE 20 From line 11 to line 13 MR.
V0: No.they just said voide that means they never have order materials reflect to the PO number 21022 and refer to purchasing department log book VOID meaning they don't have any record at all.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 21 Prom line 10 to line 18 MR.
V0 When I start to work with CP&L from April 1979 to April 1982,I was piping engineer,my performance was just dealing with pipe,and valves installation until-I april 1982 Mr.E.E. Willett transferred me to hanger Department to work under Mr. Alex Fuller supervisory.
Therefore, I don't know why,when,and who.itsued te the field the materials refer to the PO 21022 for the installation of permanent hangers.Because these materials have been issued back in 1980, EVENT THE P.0 been voided.
CORFECTION ON PAGE 21 AND 22 l
MR.
V0: In my opinion is that CP&L management lack of coordination and communication.therefore,who was issued the materials refer to PO 21022 to the field never check back to make sure it was existing PO or VOID P.O.
The correction above _ applied for line 22 of par.e 2b.and 1,121 No. 1 throurn line 10 of page 22.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 23 From line No. 5 through line No.12 KR.
V0: No Sir! Af ter finished the assigment to investgate 12 hanger packages with QA Surveillance Group,I transferred my Office report to Mr.Alex Puller and Mr. EAE. Willette in which I pointed out the materials been issued to the field on non-existing P0.That is in the morning,Mr. Alex Puller been messed on me about my report.Then same day about 3 P.M. Mr. Alex Puller called th bhck-in'his office, he said s"You are a liareyou don't know how to do the job.
He also said that he was assigned another emplyse dcwn to the warehouse,and this employee found that all documen-tation refer to PO 21022 was existing in the warehouse.
D.HIBIT (1) N Page I of
- M
1 O 4 Scf /q f
CORRECTION ON PAGE O 23 Prom line No. 18 through line No. 22 f
MR.
V0:
No, Sir. At that time I don't know how to answer to Mr Alex Puller when he called me a liar and don't know how to do the job.I only answer to Mr. Alex Puller that is in my opinion very soon he will receive the official nonconformance report from the QA Surveillance Group supported my findings.
~,
CORRECTION ON PAGE 29 and PAGE 30 From line No. 21 to line No.22 of page 29,and From line No. 1 through line No. 8 of page 30 MR.
V0:
To answer you,I have no confidence at all, Sir.
The reason that been five years to work at Shearon i
Harrie Nuclear Power Plant I found so may deficiencies but I never seen NRC tolerate on this subject.
In comparison with NRC Region III back in 1982 when they suspended Zimmer's license due to they found that were approximately 4,200 deficiencies in which the utility deal back and forth.
[
Then go back to Harris site if you try to look on their non conformance log book (E.g. DDR's log book,NCR's l
log book, DR's log book etc..) and added them up together you will see the number should be raised up over 4,000,and beside that so many non conformances just report by issuing interoffice memorandum its means no documentation.
The question in my mind is that NRC Region II know about that subject or they know but they ignored that.
That reasons I do not trust NRC Region II performance.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 30.31.AND 32 4
kO Page 30 from line 19to22,wholepage31,andline1Mor ge 32 MR.
V0 I remember that I have had read the article issued by NRC back in 1981 "SPECIAL REPORT URANIUM,1981" in which Mr. James O' Reilly saids"I am gravely concerned about shoddy construction because of.ts potential impact on public health and safety."That made me feel at least som NRC Officer still care about SAFETY.
But reality was completely differer.+.When CP&L started to built Shearon Harris Plant until june 1983 the QA DDR's log book has approximately 1,k00 or 1,500 DDR are opened,then from june 1983 to early December 1983 the DDR number increased up to a only 6 months.beside that I don'pproximately 2,k00 just t know how many NCR,and DR been opened,also how many nonconformances just reported by issuing INTEROPPICE XEMORANDUM,its seans j
i no documentations, j
Also look at non existing Work Procedure WP-110 Rev.7 and 8 with ein which over hundred Generic PCR and RCI.
1 There are more and mope, generic problems with design
- w a.c m
- Ire-D;HIBIT (3)
Page I of 2f PC1'*
4 Age 6cf/7
}
control and construction appeared from the day thpy started to built the plant until the end of 1983.For example.in lieu of analyzing the actual as-built hangers structure of the plant for performance capability and an ability to withstand.most of pipe hangers were modified in the field with hastily drawn, and over hundreds of Generic FCR and RCI been issued to cover the ts-built conditions.(Look on CP&L WP-110 rev.7 and 8 for the installation of seismic pipe hangers).
In that case does NRC Region II conduct an honest investigation of the safety issues?
Also,af ter performed investigation 12 hanger packages in july, 1983,I don't know what kind of pressure CB&L put on him and in August 1983,Mr. Vincent no more CP&L employee. Also,in early January,1984 CP&l QC inspector. nickname is TINK and his last name is WARD,only one month he found almost 1,000 deficiencies then CP&L removed him out of inspection job.
For these reasons.how should I trust NRC Region II.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 32 AND 33 Page 32 from line No.17 through line No. 22,and Page 33 from line No. 01 through line No.04 Mr.
V0: For so many reasons I have been explained to yours, I never seen any actions on NRC Region II to make an honest investigation,there was I have no confidence at all.
Also confidence on CP&L,it is no way.
I also would like to have a qgestion is that: 50%
components.and equipments been transferred from NPCD to NOD without GA documentations.Does NRC know about that?
And 400 seismic instrumentation packages been hold.I don't know why they are on HOLD.Does NRC know about that?
These informations are furnished to me by some freinds of my they are still on site.
EXHIBtT W Page _.2.-Of N8"
~
Pep 79f/7 l
j CORRECTION ON PAGE 34.35. AND 36 Page 34 from line No.13 through line No. 22, Whole page 35,and i
Page 36 from line No. 01 through line No.13.
i MR.
YO: Sir! I like to point out about my personal's history is that due to Vietnam war ending in in April 30,1975, 3
for my freedom I left my country and come to United States,during that time I lef t behind two children, because I could not get them go with me.
At that time event I do not know how to speak English, but for surviving I have to do different type of jobs, i
and go back to school to learn,and hope some day will get better.Then the end of 1978 I am graduated Associate Degree in Civil Engineering Technology from Payetteville Technical Institute,then I get job offer from CP&L in March,1984, finally I started to work with CP&L in April 1
10,1979.I.try very hard to be a good employeed(refer to the copies of my recommendations eand promotions I just gave to yours can be proved my performance.)..
I In June 1981 after over five years living in United l
States,I became American Citizenship by naturalization.
I still have two children back in-Viet Nam therefore,
}
I changed my name and hope some day I will go back to 4
Viet Nam to rescue my kids.
1 After April 1982 Mr. E.E. Willett and Alex Puller started i
push pressure on me,therefore,I went to see Mr.McDuffy, j
senior construction vice president I explained to him 1
all about the pressure that both of Willett and Fuller i
pushed on me and I cry infront of him is that I have so machtmisery.4msthe pasttSue to Vietnam war.beside I still i
have two children back home.and I talk to him "If the Company don't need me no more,please lay me off.I explained to him that I still support two kids at Viet i
Nam therefore,with lay off I can joint unemployment to have little money for seeking another emploer.3ut finally no one help all of them just try to hurt me.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 36 AND page 37 Prom line 16 through line 22 of page 36,and
? rom line 01 through line 14 of page 37 1
MR.
V0: Af ter five years applied with the U.S Immigrant and Naturalization for the reunion of my two children,in August,1984 The U.S Embassy in Thai Lan return the document of my children with the request to renew the 1
affidivit to support my children, and they said if they l
did not received new affidivit they will drop the case i
and not processed it. I did show to Mr. Robert Guild these documents.
I I am now unemployment therefore,I could not completed my affidivit,and hcw you think about the hope of me and my two kids at home?
The reason I explained to both of you my personal case,
)
because. in the PR03ATION CP&L mention my family problem.
i
Pa9te 6 of /q I know CP&L vcry pewsrful company in the North Carolina, but they just used they powerful to hurt people,they never know what is human and humane.I have had employeed with them almost five years,I found that CP&L just used they powerful and the gap of regulation to support their business by CUT-THROAT their consumers.
CORRECTION ON pAGE 40 and PAGE 41 From line 16 through line 22 of page 40,and From line 01 through line 11 of page 41.
MR.
V0: Yes Sir. Large wrong materials been used to the field.
From the begining when they started to built Harris plant CP&L QA/QC's and Construction's organization lack of inspect and control the materials.At that time any mate-rials received form different Vendors no matter SEISMIC i
or NON SEISMIC they ship to the field to, store together where ever they belong ( e.g. like they store both SEISMIC and NON SEISMIC together in Turbine bldg, Reactor bldg. Puel handling bldg. etc...).
Also particularly Daniel' craft employees,1f they made mistake due to fitting the pipe or hangers,they foreman will ask them to get their lunch box and go with him out to the gate.it meant they will terminate.the job.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 41 AND PAGE 42 From line No.14 through line No. 20 of page 41.and From line 01 through line 09 of page 42.
MR.
V0 Before became Engineer with CP&L,I was pipefitter and f
Plumber,with the experience of pipefitter and plumber help me to observe Daniel's craf t employeed very closely.
?
Example: When the Daniel's hanger fitter start to fit the seismic hanger refer to Bergen Patterson design drawing. assume in the design drawing show one member is Tube steel 4*x4"x0.250 and 2'6" long to be attached into the embed,but the existing embed was recessed therefore, the fitter need to trim off tube steel to fit.but after trim off the steel come out too short.himself he don't j
notify to his foreman that mistake,because with the inti-
+
dation by Daniel he might lost his job.Then he try pick-up
=
another stell same dimension lay down all around in the field no matter ceismic or nonseismic,also the thickness of the material substitution by his mistake could not be identified.Therefore the traceability of material cannot identified the original sources.That case happen anywhere at Harris Site from 1979 to July 1983,due to NRC findings some non conformance on the material substitutions,then Alex Puller giving order to Daniel's craft go out to the to collect all the rest of materials back to warehouse to re-certified or up grade by stamping or marking A-36 on material,because refer to new work procedure 110 rev.9 if any steels in which they have marked A-36 are SEISMIC materials.
T '. n$ @i T -,
4 a :r _ Pr?C et
Of 9 Y N CORRECTION ON PAGE k2 From line 20 to line 21 MR.
V0:
I agreed with you that A-36 is the lower grade of steel plates.but in my understanding is that refer to 10CPR Part 50 App.B Section VII required documentary all the evidence of sources of materials.beside,I am not talking judt steel base plates.how about another sources of materials like angle tube steel or I beam.
Do they are same grade?
CORRECTION ON PAGE 43 Prom line No. 3 through line No. 6 MR.
V0:
I don't know about that. I would like to say that beside steel base plate,they have up grade different materials like angle line,tute steel etc. without certification test or heat number.(that means no record of C.M.T.R) Example CP&L's DR No M.403 issued on 8-26-83..NCR No. 84-0063 also look on the hanger RM-H-165 been finding use wrong material by NRC Commissioner Mr York back in june 1983 for your infor-mation.
CORRECTION ON pAGE 46 AND PAGE 47 From line 16 through line 22 of page 46,and line 1 of page 47.
MR. V0:
After OA Surveillance Group Completed their investiga-tion on 12 hanger packages,and issued non conformance then CP&L high level management on site issued stop work order on the seismic pipe hangers.Then they start prepared new work procedure (WP-110 rev.9) to cover their mitakes.Then under Alex Puller supervision with T.B (Consultant Engineering) just hired en site together they started prepare new seismic hanger packages by destroying all the inadequate CMR or_:Lagdequa.e inspection documentatioNs.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 47 Prom line No. 4 through line No. 20 MR.
V0:
In November 1983 Mr. Alex Fuller give to me new assigment is that from now on I am field engineer.I have to be permanent in the field with the craft people to support them for non seismic hangers installation.
That means I don't right to be in office except lunch time. Due to perform my job,my crew need some surplus material to fit-up the nonseismic hanger,therefore,I went to ware house 6 at surplus area to find the material.
At that time I saw three people very closed to Alex Fuller in ware house 6.When I passed through a trsh can near by surplus area I see so many paper in that can,by curio-sity I picked-up few of them, finally,I found that are old CMR and hanger's sketchs.then 1 dicided to keep its.
EXHIBIT W N Page # 0I
Ny
/O y /f CORRECTION ON PAge 51 From line No. 1 through line line No. 5 i
MR.
YO:
All the seismic hanger packages are built from started at Harris Site refer to WP-110 Rev.0 to Rev.8 are supersided both TB's personnel and Alex Fuller's people started change completely new package to reflect to new procedure WP-110 Rev.9.The cover of new package was hard board.it was completely different with the old is soft.
i i
CORRECTION ON PAGE 51 i
Prom line No. 7 through line No.10 MR.
V0: ' Thicker Sir. Then with the new package they are discarding some inadequate documents.and some are i
transferred from the old package to the new one.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 51 Line 13 MR.
V0:
Not all Sir. They voided some of them.
I CORRECTION ON PAGE 51 AND PAGE 52 From line No. 21 through line No. 22 of page 51.and Prom line No. 01 through line No. 06 of page 52 MR.
V0:
To me they should be kept all documents due to trans-fer to new package event inadequate documents.because to the existing inadequate documents will help them to correct the problems.Because up to November 1983 the Harris Plant was 845 completed.which reflected to WP-110 rev. O through rev.8. At that time I personally found so many deficiencies containment spray hangers inside containment building near the top of the dome.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 52 l
Prom line NO. 9 to line No. 10 "R.
V0:
I don't know. Sir.At that time I did not see reper-formed inspections.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 52 AND 53 From line No. 21 to line No. 22 of page 52 and From line No. 01 through line No. 07 of page 53 MR.
Vos At that time I was Field Engineer,I never see they performed reinspections.may be they inspected different shift with me.
EXHIBIT W Page /!- 08
9
?Qf // f /f j
I CONTINUED CORRECTION ON PAGE 52 AND 53 My concern was that all materials collected back from the field to the warehouse.in which they are mixed seismic and,non seismic (it includes I beam, tube steel angle line. base plate etc..).Only I hear all Alex Fuller trust's employees were back and forth to marke delta 36 or A-36 on materials.because refer to new WP-110 rev.9 any materials.in which they have marked A-36 are SEISMIC materials.If you look on NCR. No. 84-0063.I thinhk you will find out why I was concerned about.
p CORRECTION ON PAGE 53 From line No. 10 through line No. 15 MR.
V0:
I don't know.To me when they destroy some existing documents.it was violated to 10CPR part 50 App.B.The existing documents should be stay event new procedure has completely different process.May be CP&L has another procedure allow them to do that.I don't know.
COR9ECTION ON PAGE 53 From line No. 18 to line No. 19 MR.
V0:
That's original they destroyed.I don't t'hink they kept copy.
CCREECTION ON PAGE 56 Frem line No. 2 to line No 3 MR.
V0:
I was CP&L employee,I don't want to get trouble,at that time by curiosity I did picked-up some paper on the top of trash can.
- QRRECTION ON PA0E 56 Line No. 5 MR.
V0:
No Sir,I didn't stay there very long.
C0F9ECTIO!!
ON PAGE 56 AND 57 From line No, 20 through line No. 22 of page 56,and From line No. 01 through line No. 04 of page 57 MR.
V0:
Excuse me a second. Assume CP&L has proper procedure to allow them destroyed CMR.Why they didn't des troyed all of them.The reason I see they just destryed a part and keep a part.These performance includes TB consultant on site.
CORPECTION ON PAGE 57 EXHIBIT G]' g From 11ne so. 6 through line No. 9 45' 4E-MR.
VCs They have contract with CP6L,to work with pipe hanger construction department.As far I know they job is developed and laplemented how to control hanger program.
....U Ady /2 Y /f CORRECTION ON PAGE 58 AND 59 From line No. 20 through line No. 22 of page 59 and Prom line No. 01 through line No. 04 of page 60.
MR.
V0:
I know very clear about 10 CPR part 50 App. S.
The reason I an here today to show to both of your these evidence.and hope with your expertise in the Nuclear Power industry.pertecularly NRC Investigator you might tell me that CP&L is not violated NRC regulation due to construct at Harris plant.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 59 Prom line No. 7 through line 'No. 9.
MR.
V0:
You are NRC Investigator.I think you know exactly NRC regulation required Utilities to built a nuclear
' power plant.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 59 Prom line No. 19 through line No. 21.
MR.
V0:
Here are two DDR's No 2317 and 2327 the highest No that CP&L's QA were issued in early december 1983.then they supersede the DDR procedure.The reason I like to pointed out in here is that NRC Region II know until the end of 1983 how many nonconformances were issued at Marris Site ( this includes NCRe and DR ) and how many of them are dispositioned ?
CORRECTION ON PAGE 61 Prom line No. 7 to line No.13 MR.
V0:
The reason I am giving to your about the copies of DDRein which I would like to show only 6 months from june 1983 to early December 1983 the number of DDR increased from approx.1.500 to approx. 2.l*00. Also I like to repeated the question are that NRC know how many non conformances have been written up,and how many of them are dispositioned.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 62 Pron line No 1 to line No. 10.
MR.
V0:
I agreed with you the number was very s1Enificant. Sir.
But the point why CPiL been built Harris Site so many years ago then now they supercede DDR procedure and e
changed to use different procedure by go back to lcwest number.In my opinion is that CP&L afraid to be suspen-ded like Zimmer plant.
.E.
W
f y B Of /f
~
CORRECTION ON PAGE 62 AND PAGE 63 Prom line No. 20 through line No. 22 of page 62.and Prom line No. 01 through line No. 04 of page 63.
MR.
V0:
Both me and Mr. Buck Williams (Former Mechanical CA Engineer with TVA) have read the NRC Docket No.50-358 Construction permit No. CPPR-88 EA 82-129.
ORDER IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDING CONSTRUCTION.Therfore, we know very good why NRC suspended Zimmer.Beside Mr.
Williams has strong experience and expertise about QA/QC program.and he might be proposed to his super-visor how to get away from that problem.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 63 FRom line No 11 to line No 12 MR.
V0:
That's what I think. I really don't know NRC Region II focuses on this aspect.
From line No.15 to line No 16 MR.
V0:
NO. I don't think Mr. Buck Williams idea.The CP&L high level r.anagement downtown made that decision.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 63 AND 64 1
From line No 20 through line No. 22 of page 63.and From line No.1 of page 64 MR.
V0:
They still writing non conformance refer to new NCR procedure but with the new procedure the number was go back to be like 84-0001.
i l
CORRECTION ON PAGE 64 From line No 7 through line No 13 MR.
V0 Yes they are still writing nonconformance refer to new procedure.But beside that how many memorandum report the deficiencies like the'one I.am giving to you.Also
- I have one DDR # 1875 was writing on 8/17/83 with 36 paEes cover about hundreds of weld deficiencies.
My concern is that NRC know about that.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 74 AND pare 75 From line No. 22 of page 7k.and From line No i throuEh line No. 4 of page 75 MR.
V0 I really don't know how to explain to you that they are really discriminated me but no evidences nor statement.
Finally in mid 1983 Mr. Ed Mc. Lean come to ask Mr.
Willett is that he need me.and he would like Mr.Willett transfer to to his department.3ut the answer in NO.
(, hT G) /3 W ot.
OC /[
/[
f CORRECTION ON PAGE 75 AND PAGE 76
? rom line No. 12 throu line No.,1 of page 76.gh line No. 22 of page 75,and MR.
V0:
Yes. Sir. That's I feel.Because I remember back in 1980.when Mr. E.E. Willett take over the Mechanical Construction Departmrnt at Harris Site. He called me into his office.He said Chan in this Department only you and me are older.And he told me that he was a U.S. Navy CAPTAIN retired.When he told me that really make me so proud.because it is very hard to have a boss is CAPTAIN in U.S. MAVY.' Because in my opinion with U.S. NAVY's traditional if someone moved up to CAPTAIN.they will have very strong experience of LEADERSHIP and well managed.Por these reasons made me believe that I am lucky -to be employeed with Mr. Willett.
3~cause I personnally been trained to be respected and e
disciplined.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 76 From line No.3 to line No. 5 MR.
YO:
After few month Mr. Willett created very good atmos-phere in his department by opening a beer bash in which will help employees under his supervision closed together.That's I think at that time.
CORRECTION ON PAGE-76 AND page 77 From line No 7 through line No 22 of page 76,and Prom line No 1 through line No 08 of page 77.
MR.
V0:
Then in early 1983 we have party at Mr. Larry Coble house about 70 miles South of Raleih.Af ter the party Mr. Willett askQme,Mr. Taggart,and Mr. Ed Mc Lean to play card with him.
I say I don't know how to play American's card.therefore I asked Mr. Mc Lean if I win he got to let me know, and if I lose just take my money.During we play card,I don't what happen Mr. Taggart lost all his money,and Mr. Wikin Willett decided the game is over.Taggart and his wife so mad,they talk something se badly to Willett. Finally 3 A.M. the party is over,the distance from the party to Taggart's house about 70 miles,and his car was run out of gas.He asked me to borrow some money.I said I got 10 dollars lef t you take.
Two weeks after the party Mr. Taggart and his wife be laid off.on the same day Alex ?uller let Taggart know is that he will be out off his job, Puller interview another graduate student to replace Taggart.
EXHIBIT (O N Page O
N888 p_M
1 pq gyy CORRECTION ON PAGE 77 AND PAGE 78 l
From line No.11 through line No 22 of page 77,and Prom line No 1 to line No 2 of page 78.
l
(
M2.
Voi Yes. Sir. Then two weeks later their notice, Daniel lay off Mr. Taggart and his wife.I am so impressed about this case.And I think some days they will do that on me.Therefore,I decided to see Mr. Puller and asked him: Just because personal conflict between Willett and Taggart you lay both of them off.and could you tell me when Mr. Willett and you will lay me off or terminate my job 7 Mr. Fuller said:They are Daniel's employees,and you are CP&L's employee don't worry about that.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 78 AND PAGE 79 Prom line No 19 through line No 22 of'page 78,and Prom line No.1 through line No 5 of page 79.
MR.
V0:
No, Sir. I remember back in the end of 1979,two black graduate Engineer come to interview,but they never get the job.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 79 AND PAGE 80 Line 22 of page 79 and line 1 of page 80 MR.
V0:
I told Mr. Fuller is that I am 'now d6oking for another job,when I found one I will let him know right away.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 83 line No 5 MR.
V0s There are so many reasons. Sir.
CCRRECTION CN PAGE 83 AND 84 From line No. 9 through line No. 22 of page 83.and From line No 1 through line No. 17 of page 84 MR.
V0 No, Sir. Not for my suggestion.
I think is harrassing me for the following reasons:
1/ I raised up the deficiency of feedwater pump, 2/ May be Mr. Willett knows is that he told me before he was CAPTAIN in U.S. NAVY,but some U.S NAVY 's Officer.like Mr. Ed. Mc. Lean told me he wasn't.
Therefore,I think he is the shame of his story.
3/ I also raised up the qqestion about personal conflict between him and Mr. Taggart.
4/ 3efore finishing my asbuilt walkdown verification program,Mr. Willett walkout from Mr. Fuller office continued next page EXHIBIT 6) '-
Page lof ~T P8888
Nfl /d of /f he stop and say hello to me then he found on my desk " Guidelines for system asbuilt walkdown verification inspection" he said it is very good and he asked me let him has a copy.
Then I hear due to the meeting of Construction management at Harris Site,Mr. Willett was in the meeting and he suggested to use his program. Finally two months later my program is finished and I send i
to him acopy.same time I mailed one copy to Mr.
Mc. Duffy.I think that the reason make him mad at me, and try to harrass me.
Also on october 30,1984 due to seking employer in Charlotte,I visited my former Supervisor Mr. Thomas French, Technical Manager of J.A JONES,Inc..(he was former CP&L's employee). At that time,by curiosity I am asking him Mr. Prench. You are employee with CP&l about 7 years,may be you know them better than I am. Why back in 1979-80 to me that we do very good job then CP&L started have more consultant engineering came on site to help CP&L to resolve the construction problem ( like Duke Power's employees, TB.Bergen Patterson,Ebasco and etc... ).Mr. French answer to me that CP&L afraid because they lack of expertise and experience in the Nuclear power construction.also poor management.
CORRECTION ON pAGE B4 Line No 22 MR.
V0:
They come in a resident engineering outfit as field engineers Sir.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 85 From line No 6 through line No 15.
MR.
V0:
In early october 1984,due to visit two freinds of my, they are presently still employees at Harris plant, they told me story about 50 % equipments and components tranferred from NPCD to NOD are without QA documenta-tions,also hbout 400 seismic instrumentation packages are on HOLD.Its were very strange to me and in my mind I don't know NRC Region II know or tolerate these problems or not 7 Due to five years employee with CP&L I try to suggest with my supervisor different program,and hope to bring up on time the system refet to RF*:should transfer to NOD on schedule.
CORRECTION ON ON PAGE 85 AND PAGE 86 i
From line No. 20 through line No. 22 and line 1 of page 86 RR, V0 No one listens to me, Sir. Event my suggestion is good program.
6 PeteS
$f // el ff 1
CORRECTION ON PAGE 86-
.-, et From line No. 8 through line No. 12 MR. V0 r After I explained with Mr Mc Duffy the condition that Mr. Willett and Puller are harrassing me.I cry with him and I also asked to lay me off.Mr. Mc Duffy saide Chan you are a good man go back to work and fill out the reqqest transfer form,then I will help you I listen to him,go back to work and filled the form out.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 87 From line No. 5 through line No. 9 MR. V0:
I don't think so.The request transfer form is just the formality.3ecause if different organization accept my transfer,I think they will call Willett or Puller to have reference on me.
CORRECTION ON PAGE 89 From line No. 10 through line No 18 MR. V0:
Few months later,I asked Mr. Jim Bell.he's an Electrical Project Engineer,is that he know someone at BRUNSWICK in Southport N.C,please introduce to me,I would like Transfer overthere.The reason he knew what the plan is that both Willett and Puller intended to hurt me.By I
helping me.he gave to me the memorandum from him to Mr. George Cameron to introduce me is that I am seeking to transfer to Southport.
I went down to Brunswick plant for seekin after talking with different supervisors,g transfer, they said will check and call me back.Few days later I call back to check about my case,they say they don't have job opening for me.
CORRECTION ON pAGE 90 From line No. 2 to line line No.3 MR. V0:
I guest so.
From line No 8 through line No 11 I
MR. V0:
First I though was Fuller,but some freinds of my they asked me.Chan do you know who turn you down.I said I don't know.They said it's Mr. Mc Duffy.
From line No,14 through line No. 19 MR. V0 Yes, they told me that,and I asked them Why? They said Mc. Duffy is construction Senior Vlce Fresident,1f he is willing to help you,you will be transferred right i
away.This is rational exponation to me.
. - -..~_.
4p
/s cy /7 o
CORRECTION ON pAGE 91
.f L
Prom line No. 6 through line No.10.
MR.
V0:
I just try to show to two NRC's Investigators about the temporary Seismic-hanger procedure prepared by Jim Johnson and approved by Alex Fuller to use cable to support safety piping due to RPT (that means Nuclear Power plant construction department will transfer the safety piping system 'in which:they support by tempo-rary cble to Nuclear Operation department Start-U When they call temporary support that means no QA/p)
QC inspection nor documentation.
Is that proper procedure?or non existing procedure /
Is that NRC Region II,or NRC's Commissioners at Harris Site know about that aspect?
From line No 13 to line No 17.
MR.
V0:
It is very important subject in that I like to scan in here.3ecause due to lack of construction controlling and material traceability and inspection documenting.
therefore. JIM johnson created that procedure and Alex
?uller approved. Who is Jim Johnson ? As the information from the Daniel's Craft moved from Wolf Creek to Harris site that Jim Johnson was Daniel Engineer Supervisor in construction Mechanical Department at Wolf Creek.due to Daniel Screw that plant by same performance.therefore.
l The Kansas Power and Light terminated all of them.Then l
this Daniel organization moved to Hae-is Site. At that time I explhined' toMr.'?uller if you used. this + procedure is very dangerous,because if NRC find out we might be get trouble,I also let him know that Jim Johnson and Daniel performed and terminated by Kansas Poewr,I said If you don't believe me you can come to ask my foreman Mr. Jack Edmonos about Jim Johnson and Daniel organization at Wolf Creek.
CORRECTION ON pAGE 92 page 13 MR.
V0:
With the whole evidences I just show to both of you,
that are not enough to help you to know who they are ?
From page 14 through page 17 MR.
V0:
Large CP&L's emplovees on site know about that.He is just a biaggadocio.
- RRIETItX7%XXIX2EX1RXXXRx11
- XHIBIT G)
- Page
'Y d $f-
- EN
\\
i fGy lf f ll l
CORRECTION ON PAGE 92 AND PAGE 93 From line No. 20 through line No 22 of page 92 and Prom line No.1 through line No. 7 of page 93.
MR.
V0:
I am not an investigator with all evidences I am giving here aren't enough evidences to determine their competence.May be my observation is wrong.
May be with the strong experience of NRC's Investi-gator you might be determined they are very good.
In my opinion,Shearon Harris plant almost i decade i
schedule delay. costs exorbitant and so on,is that they are enoughtcpapetence? or they are competendh but they plan to be that way?
CORRECTION ON PAGE 94 From line No. 6 through line No 17 of page 94 MR.
V0:
If you think they are still competent people.please 1
go back to review on the CP&L's organization chart at Harris Site from September 1981 until the present.
I think you will find out who they are? what their i
responsibility?and where they be for comparison with the present I think that is enough evidences to help you to know they are still competent or not CORRECTION ON PAGE 105 From line No.12 through line No. 13 MR.
V0:
I could by using speed letter to report the deficiencies to my management.(it was Mr. Puller ).
CORRECTION ON PAGE 106 From line No. 3 through line No 8 MR.
VO:
I was field Engineer,and the CP&L's didn't mentioned field Engineer to write up DDR or Net t
CORRECTION ON PAGE 110 Fro: line No 12 to line No 13 f
MR.
V0:
They signed off completion weld inspection. event 1
there are improperly welds i
'ss
{
ExHIBlT (5)
Pne MUI
flA THE CONSERVATION COUNCIL OF NORTH CAROLINA 307 Grenville Raed, Chapel Hill, N.C. 27574 (919) 942 7935 er 9421080 (24 heves)
November 25, 1984 c7 Ja'mes L. Kelley 3
Glenn O. Bright
[
,f y; Dr. James H. Carpenter 23
.. -d Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,tG Washington, D.C.
20555
.m
- D co 2
Re: Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (Docket 50-400 OL) g.
Dear Sirs:
As requested at the hearing in Raleigh on November 15, I am supplying an affidavit in support of the Conservation Council's Contention WB-2 which addressed the " safety significance" of the feedwater pump and system.
As you will notice, the affidavit has not been signed by Mr. Van Vo.
This is a draft affidavit although it is my understanding from Mr. Van Vo's a ttorney, Mr. Guild, that Mr. Van Vo has read and approved it.
He is sending me a signed and verified original. I unfortunately will not be available next week as I have a hearing down in Jacksonville, NC.
I have asked Mr.
Eddleman to send copies of the signed affidavit if it is sent to my office before I return.
Attached to the draf t af fidavit are five exhibits'which show that the feedwater system in the turbine building was classed as " Safety Class 4/ Seismic Class 1" at the time of the problem in August of 1982. Part of the sytem was latter "de-classified," although the feedwater piping itself has apparently not been. The affidavit and exhibits supply adequate basis for the contention.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to submit this affidavit in support of our contention.
Sincerely, John Runkle General Counsel Enc.
cc. Service List Robert Guild, Attorney for Chan Van Vo
_ Or I I f 00 Nah/
h o
u m ome,-
Azt 13 ap.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the Conservation Council's Affidavit of Chan Van Vo and Exhibits were served upon the following by deposit in the U. S. Mail, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery.
James L. Kelley Robert Gruber Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Public Staff, Utilities Commission US Nuclear Regulatory Commission PO Box 991 4
Washington, D.C.
20555 Raleigh, NC 27602 Glenn O. Bright Dr. Linda Little same address Governor's Waste Management Board 325 N. Salisbury St., Room 513 Dr. James H. Carpenter Raleigh, NC 27611 same address Thomas Baxter Docketing and Service (3 cc.)
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Office of the Secretary 1800 M Street, N.W.
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20036 Washington, D.C.
20555 Charles A. Barth Office of the Executive Legal Director l
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission a
Washington, D.C.
20555 ce Daniel F. Read John Runkle PO Box 2151 Conservation Council of NC Raleigh, NC 27602 307 Granville Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 M. Travis Payne PO Box 12643 g
Raleigh, NC 27605 This is the$$J th day of November, 1984.
Dr. Richard D. Wilson 729 Hunter Street Apex, NC 27502 Wells Eddleman 718-A Iredell Street Durham, NC 27705 Bradley W. Jones US NRC--Region II 101 Marrietta Street Atlanta, CA 30303 Richard E. Jones Vice President--CP&L PO Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602
DRAFT l
My name is Chan Van Vo.
I an also known as Van Vo Davis.
I am giving this
]
ctatement to Robert Guild, Attorney-at-Law, of Charleston, South Carolina, who has identified himself to me as a representative of the Government Accountability Project. I have been asked to provide further information to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board of the Nuclear Regulatory Cossaission about the significance cf the improper cold pulling and misalignment of the Steam Generator Feed Water 4
Pump; and CP&L's mishandling of my efforts to identify and properly correct this nonconformance.
2.
I repeat my professional opinion expressed in my October 6, 1984, Affidavit that the effective function of these pumps, valves and piping are nuclear safety significant. At the time I attempted to decuwnt the deficient i
fit-up of the Feed Water piping and the resultant stress-induced misalignment cf the pump in August 1982 - and during the ' entire course of construction of the Barris Plant until then-the Feed Water system, its piping, pipesupports, valves and pumps, were classified by the Architects / Engineers Ebasco Services,.
Inc., by CP&L, and by their contractors as " Safety Class 4/ Seismic Class I,"
-l l
an acknowledgement of its nuclear safety significance. This classification j
cpplied to the Feed Water system in the Barris Turbine Building. Conformance j
to the Co W ssion's 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B Quality Assurance Criteria such co detailed inspection and documentation were required for the Feed Water system.
3.
After several years of serious problems in the design, fabrication, installation, and inspection of piping and associated components in the Turbine j
l l
i l Building at the Harris Plant, CP&L faced the prospect of performing extensive and costly rework including necessary inspections and documentation as required by the NRC's QA regulations. Instead of seeing that the job was done right--
by the same standards that even CP&L had couaitted to honor-- CP&L sought to circumvent quality standards and thereby " alleviate all concerns related to the i
cdditional inspection and documentation requirements for the supports in the
~
Turbine Building," by attempting to "de-classify" the Feed Water and Main Steam cystems inside the Turbine Building.
4.
In my opinion such attempts by CP&L Engineers Ed Willett and Alex Fuller to "de-classify" these important systems simply represent efforts to cover-up their own shoddy work; as did their responses to my attempt to document cud correct the Feed Water Pump nLisalignment.
5.
Even the limited documentation available to me now supports my position.
For Example, I attach as Exhibit 1 Work Directive No. 2836, dated 7/13/83, for,
Turbine Building Feed Water pipe support T-3-261-1-FW-H-11, which reflects this "de-classification" of the Feed Water hangers in the Turbine Building:
.. this hanger is considered non-seismic and will require no CI or QC involvement or cceeptance." This Work Directive cites generic Field Change Request FCR-H-1145,
" Reclassification of MS & FW Supports in the Turbine Building." Revisions 0 and I reflect site approval by Ed Willett on 1/14/83 and Alex Fuller on 5/13/83, res-pectively. They are Exhibits 2 and 3, attached.
These generic FCRs rely on a November 12, 1982, Ebasco letter EB-C-14332, I
i
l
' I Exhibit 4. for anchority to " reclassify the mainacean and feedwater pipe supports and the main steam piping, in the turbine building. These items are to be non-seismic, in accordance with letter EB-C-14332." No mention is made of the Feed Water piping lines themselves in the FCRs. since the Ibasco letter expressly excepts the Feed Water piping from de-classification: "Please note that the generic FCR should also cover the feedwater supports in the Turbine Building. From the 1
~
inspection and documentation aspects, these supports can be handled as B31.1, non-seismic, however, the lines will not be declassified to non-seismic." Thus, even long af ter my observation of the improper fitmp of the Feed Water pipe-to-pump connection, the Feed Water piping line remained Seismic Class I-requiring Quality Assurance program compliance. The Bergen-Patterson drawing for pipe-support FN-B-11. Exhibit 5. dated 5/27/83, continues to reflect " Safety Class 4/
Seismic Class I" for this hanger.
6.
I continue to question the validity of CF6L's attempts to solve their problems of shoddy work at the Harris Plant through such "de-classification" of quality requirements. The nonconformance I observed was a violation of such quality requirements applicable at the time they were violated. My concerns should have been investigated and documented properly at the time by my management.
they were not. Neither "de-classification" of defective work nor discarding
{
employee complaints will make the Shearon Earris Nuclear Power Plant safe. I only hope that this WRC Licensing Board will.
l SWORN to and subscribed before me Chan Van Yo this day of November, 1984.
-um s russ.u, m
,.,y,,
O
'h,
cy, s
EXMIBITS we-no
-P EE5"i si m 1
28 %
WD-WORK DIRECTIVE E3-26/
/ -
M-~
REV.
PIPE HANGER No, S e f t' 2. N - // 4 5)
TH/h NAAJ6EE IS t'oAJS/DERED LicAl.6E/SHK. AAJO hJ/CL P.EQu/Ed A/O, & os OC ILVOLVfMEAW oE Ac.cfPTA A.KG.
Q 1
_ = _ -
t' i -f.*:.,
~
.m. ~ y. ; -
u I
l COMPLETED
/ DATE
~ACxNow(EDGED /
DATE ACKNOWLEDGECy DATE (HANGER FOREMAN) /
(0, t.)
/
M. C.)
/
l i
/
e ACM NOWLEDGED / DATE (WELDING SUPV FOR NON-Q) /
l
@F-SC L-
' ~ ~ ~
N1m & L2MW CDI&A.M C#-Ut-03 l
I4v. 15 SHIA*^N HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER Pl. ANT Exhibit 1 2//,/82 TIEIl. dANGE REQUIST/ PERMANENT WAIVER TcR/as M - // '/#)
Feso 1 of
.ypo cf Request:
p y,,_gggg Q
Permanent Waiver to "use-as-is" O Asxz Section III Division 1 Tield Change O Asxt Section III otvision 2 O
See Roc - maded Action EQ O 8*P-Q Nonconforrance g No O Tes Report No.
ppy g Identification of Arar. and Item: g gggj syggy, n p66f5WA16@. PIPE S V./t oe/T S,
4*.10 MA.f u E TEAA4 p ip s4 G i JM Tb4 A tu e Pioi Los4 C.
Conflict / Condition L%-C-/4 3I2. ( A rrA<.,<m I Reference Documents or Attachment
/_Errse 8
- b w/ati Q.f G 5. G-t o7 So1 h r 4 44i, Aol As 9 1.
" ban Fesowam.
h '-ru i:
TLa Maiu M ;,0.e rves,u e
- suito, e C(Assm e a s, s
u es c'
00:
A M AbgCI C,
- f 5
OF CA F t 'ig 25 i
c
% EC(,usTg Tah6o p ootuuen u Micy teuuiTu ew' -
^, i a
e.
Aee so' s e (-e.nA*
AG ypqoy,%te C%$TRDdi C.'h or rwe M 7-RE D
O.
o* Wi 4 tMiyES&.:_W @-\\
h.
A r r.u A o i F
Recommended Action:
ease Investigate and Resolve PROKCT ENG'"c! 'f()j e Resolve as re nous ADb A
4L9 E Tc MNiu
/2 I C1 Sc1 j2 V 3 Am3o2., avl C
7.o p E c.LA 5s e c y -ru 6 Maid STE AM AuD F E E 0 W ATC9t. D./M s ef @5, v
wb
-fu 6 MA'd S'TE*M E' I'd 6' s #4
-" E r v,T g,.,, c, n u,i_ rs. u c.
i
'Te 4 G.5 E (tGM5 A/2 6
-rc s'> E N04-TE W(g lu n c,gg n n,g(, g l
w e-74 fG176t E. r3-C.- 14 3 3 7.
DOC kNT COYTROL
@APR 8 1983 REN
^k?3{*.P.P.
Justification:
74 C46 is ur> e W
Et w 1 T" 4 6 3 g
(-t e i Rf Mq r i sm e Ce) %E 544 e t T*,Ae ru ra c
.t.t W T Mst i (.a-Te o O C A A.S C 5 v 0- u CC.t 11A4 e d 5 t'W l'c y.4m D u C u u ( v 7* '7s., G.
k
'Requectad by:
Site A preval:
\\
7&w h
llH./lPh f
bC Af7 l*H $3
~
D'is41plind Engineer Da t e '
Senior Resident Eneineer Date
- "# 1 E-Rw. 18
} f
-/h-Fogo 2 of De ign Organisation Approval 6 AZ Q NSSS Q NFID Only Q Other Tclcphone Resolution O Tas O No Design organization Attachments O ye, g3.
N Approved as Recommended O Rejected O Conditional Approval This change requires the following Document (s) (Specification, Dyaving, SAR, etc.)
L3 be changed gy, yy $ $ g gcq Sng ya gog, j'f3 Comments:
.?DTS 59 -/07CC/ 9'b?D 2 ccNt Of AhsW%
M S8-c~ /fy'332 N
PL/Cedl2 AN ~N Y
/& hay,r}'.
Signature Title Date Signature V Title Date CF&L Harris Plant Engineering Approval EFES Attachments O Tes Q No
[ Approvad as Recomunended O Rejected O Conditional Approval l > A
&kh w es 9
e/A/zfar fiscipfine Engineer D ja e MMPE or ffE/
[1 Da Sito Concurrence: Recommend W iesentation N/
]!
O Alternate Resolution C Reiected Senne ResidTnt EndQIeer ' Sate Dictribution:
(Copy)
(Original) Document Control I E7I (Conv)
(Cspy)
(Copy}
Implementation coupleted as Approved?
O Tes Coments:
O so Discipline Engineer Date
'l )FinalDistribution:
J (Orde4 u li trile in Dec. Control (Ccevi (Conv)
(Copv)
(Conv)
(Coev)
_M
_____i
ggggggypnrw f
.Permenent C2iver J
c=%.Q g QNon-Q n.i. Cnon,e Non-ASE
' M, m
I Nonconformance A//4 ASME Sect..I Z Div.
Suilding rt/ eft /M Ethu)/M.
ASME Sect. 23,Div.2 Elevotion da RFTs
. lJl ", T':l W its m.dG4-Sk/ - f- %dKO. 06 %
Isometnes N/A instruments N /A valves N /H unes M /A Cotises M /A List Au Reference hn.ta (Drawings, Specs.,FCR's,DCN's, Procedures,Etc) i ETTEQ L B -L.
u4.33 2. c arrno+co) ce2AN4 L-21bS'C,-/o7501 REv. f 4@ So 2. R E V 4-
' Description t
RELLAS%tStCATlLA G MS $ fk/ $6MbCTS IM THE fvA8ldE' Mru%
Conflict / Condition
~
7H6 MA MrgAM nub FesownrGR. P PE sopponts ig rsg TVAI3iNE Su t wER.E c.LA 551 FI GD A 5 sE*5 Mt c f FC R, pgC. pas g,5 a p ny ggv5ig i.
Est/susc oc sacgrY SSiFICATrord OR RS6Ud4TcAY commsfsgNT.
g7 2
THth RE4v)RES coc, Tlord au6-T557tN6 wHICH IS NOT NE46S5df-/
W NOU' O 6 E H nt rog 1nc u f5 oF TH E Pl.A MT.
ttochments:
O No
%Yes
, ;- L AMES 3 1 4-0F d-
- H
^"'*"
'U7
.OPieene in tieem/ Rue,e 99 KPleou Rgve As Fouows I
G -khs -
h5 To ORAwiWG Rev T'6 An o 50 2. EsV.4-TO R.ELLASilFY THE MAttJs an OWATGlL PIAC s>uPR.dt.TS, A40 TH E MRi N57 EAM AtP 4G, 'N SuiLDin, THESE ?rsH5 ARE TO GE NON -set 6 HIC. e u A Pt LETT6A E8-C -
1433 2. Ex4EgrT FOR. TH6 FCLLOWied 84 R$ ;
FW -H-14h 14 5' 300 201 2.0.5, 204,- 2 OG', 2.0b, 2.0 7, f 7.2 %(o 411.
!"1S~N ~ ZlZ> L13 2
y 3
Z3k 234j 88 E37 8 346, 214, 21 Zlb 217 219 ?30 22l 2 Z
FiEEONATER FRAMd5 d-l-3di g d-g 32.j j
j sic) La i Lt. AI 60 REP-f Al tJ SEISM C.,
.stificction 4.W1 scM A60u6 SFe s 5 Fs t 'a cAi re.a s A or Sust 1s c - M" S US# 1-
= e4 $ 546 t L196CS i T-261-FW-C' 610 > '- 2 8/o-N5 -I.
J L'!1 i.
T L H R u, f n l 5-1.5- 0 kh M
$~-12 -8.]
cicline Engineer Date Senior Rksident Engin'eer Dare mm den er
~
- - - - ~
s Y.5/4lu os
~ Einimit e pCn w ~ b+ ' II46 REY}
p.,,g,e d-
':'j: l
.:: )
Organization Approvo C AE O NSSS 8NPED Daly O Other
-Q.-
( 65 Aone Resolution O vos O no Design organtuot on Attocaments O Yee ens
[E,
- l Approved as Recommended O meiected O Coadificaat Aporovet hiy unenge requires the following Documends) (Specification,Drowing,$ AR Etc.) to be changed:
C-
?l6S-G - 10350 l W 2(4S%&-Ir)iSs ?
'i nents:
9 l
N' M,.
t>w Title Date h5-eture Title Date Signature CPSL Herris Piont Engineering Approval trES Attochments O Yes
[3 No Approved os Recommended O Reiseted O Conditional Approval
.. l 664'xo cie sk^ W-/4332. 47x4l>s ml sr w-H4'46 G d
/7~-2 %.-x 6-/ Rav'b R:.
m g,a, m s:
-h i
b.
OM'O
//M I TWE 8 b d.
7b(r 83 a
h) 4 rze
.Disciciine Engineer Dete MHPE or PPE Date Concurrenos:
Recommend
{
M Mf 4,e Ar#7' 5~/Z8
[Shr.ier ";::[-6/ Engineer
' Date
{)
Ir f Copy) ginet) Document Cannet (Con) ov) Dh/10 77MBERuw.G - WELD
- A.TG (Cooy) e)w*to m Ster-o C komentation Completed As Approved ?
O Yes C No
' intents:
Dete Discipline Engineer m
E Distritsution:
('dev) wiginet) Irlle in Dec. Contret
(%)
oey)
'Coov) opy)
HXPO-411.XXX.231 9 9 J
r ESASC5 SERVICES INCORiAATED cATO Two wono rraos camer New Yoru N Y @48 EB-C-File:
h-2 5-S-11 Mr L I Loflin, Manager Engineering - Harris Plant Carolina Power and Light Company F 0 Box 101 New E111, North Carolina 27562 1
Dear Mr Loflin:
SUBJECT:
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ANALYSIS OF MAIN STEAM LINES SMS2-144 -
THROUGH 150
Reference:
CE-13476 We have reviewed your request for deletion of snubbers associated with the subject lines and wish to offer the following for your consideration.
The EB-B-241 correspondence provided a criteria for support loads which assure o satisfactory seismic design. The snubbers in question cannot be replaced with rigid restraints without thermally overstressing the pipe during plant normal cperation.
It is noted that any snubbers located in the Turbine Building will be reviewed and deleted if the criteria for design of anchors at seismic /non-seismic inter-faces are not violated.
Regarding the subject lines, portions of the lines inside the Turbine Building do not have to be seismically designed.
As discussed with your Mr G White, the most efficient way to reflect this change is to have CP&L prepare a generic FCR which would request Ebasco to "de-classify" all MS lines / portions of lines inside the Turbine Buildin's to 331.1, non-seismic lines.
Due to the large scope of these lines (such broader than 5MS2-143 through 150 as indicated in your letter) the disposition cf this change through a line and valve list would be too extensive.
In our opinion this generic PCR will alleviate all concerns related to the additional inspection and doctmentation requirements for the supports in the Turbine Building. The only exception to this generic approach are the major Main Steam lines from the interface anchor to the turbine stop valve (44" lines).
The declassification of these lines will be handled through a formal revision to the line list and other design documents including the FSAR. This is highlighted in our reply to your CE 13502 letter.
Please note that the generic FCR should also cover the feedvater supports in the Turbine Building.
From the inspection and documentation aspects, these supports can be hacdled as B31.1, non-seismic, however, the lines vill not be declassified to non-seismic. This is due to the fact that the interface anchors were not designed for the seismic /noc-seismic load criteria.
Please provide us with the aforementimed FCR as soon as possible.
p % -
..-% u uj g
_-.._____...-r-
2-ANALYSIS OF MADI STEAM LINES SMS2-144 TEROUGE 150.
If you have any questions, please call us.
Very truly yours, I U N-1KMatzelfe Project Manager FF:amb cc: L I Loflin l
J J Sheppard L E Martin J L Willis R M Parsons Sheldon D Smith G L Forehand N J Chiangi 4
l9 i
e J
t I
..,.m_
-.-,y y
["i""
~ A h b ll. 6-z.
cTP Ts. /:se4 x W. x E-9 *4 (e.r-x e.mo 4'4. s)
/pz 4 %.
t CTV T-s. 614x %
-n *44 (mru aseo M n}_
4.5
~1- (E -5 g
V1-t
<r!
- 7. s..+ x n %.n a h e s 'c.4 (asm nas ase m Gs
.s xL4 t
47>
rt: AL x H hs a 3'-2 k'44 (ns.r*+ asee d e.s) 93 l--
J~f I
W$~
E L7#
Ts.4n 4 5. %. x 4'-9 %* 44 (an=* Anae ne s)-
/46
- -= -
_J l
f4 s
er 2 og x y w. sa'.,W M (sn.ss) 9 y i= g ?-m mB?
{
S
~
..)
VW n.
cc -
2 m a s.tv s o'- s % ' 1 4
- -tsn-5)
=
L
.3 are: 10 *A4s0 Rae STWiff-
=-
w. ' P-pa / F 4".
st N./
/C f-/h L
Bo l '9 TL
'd6ser Km. G*n psM cUs4P '
' ~~. "
.t :
n
.L.-
CTF - 'C1 +x4s95 1 e'-d'44 (457>t har Co.8)
_. }
l _,.m 1
- p
...<. ?
y g
. cs...
..ggd,sN'rg-l y a..
- nru.wr us-c
.z -
c.s
.saa rpr 1
.. W. d a ;.,',p,s.9 $ g. a m g. g '= W % *.*'. %.Q.eV '.-
..]
- T-[,.
l....
hm e
,c.
EQ.U.tchranswn u-v.ow coeTam. sumota aTao
....s.
. 2 z...,.... :.
t
.w.r
- .... e!
L. w r u......:;.,. 6; W'-
..pu.
Q ~. '.g#
n.. a N
'.M.; % c.7'@.~ -@'.gg.P.;+d.1 f :,
... x.
av. 4 F
. ie.ja.
g > ;
l,, QQM j,
'?
lJ M 0
j Rbtts
.. ~ ~
., s M h 9 ' 2.. (PA) osENsiON 'bbCATES. Mk.'[-*.1,. *. F J'%%-.h%'.[ ~
. 1 ',
.i g
.m.u. m oe,wo. men-
- 2. (STL) DHENS'.ON LOCATES CENTl et M-4 7
'I.
LINE 'Of STML ATTA'HMNT ses ace 6 sep een see sea
'+-
Wr:
to
-,e/
- . /et-(.
s.
1
~
d-opsmarino
't N twennsai.. % :...a'.T a.o -
-37.
-se T
\\
\\
3.
.w x
manu u.:.f v.r n...
..-r
- -- Q....
z,l,
toca e..
. to
..e.
.... ~..
... A V
v
.\\.
.AHR1 d *m V a cosa menPossesi ri.e 5429 l
N
~ '. ~.
\\..
.... wnc s i.c
.ssy.
. s.s.y l, nu 2 seammes=ansassosames ss0 2 to g 3 e4+.
- 4. M B mbre
.,r N
.y
,. m.,,, r>. r.
N
_.... --. _..... _. _. p g g
.p,
.g g
g peg z to 9o+z 3
..g 9 5--... '.am,aan - :. _ e
~
\\
.. - ogno a r.a k
',,. 1 :,
to wono
...4 e o
ew.aen mov. -
,anierno nones..-
p.
3 '
3
~
j g
.* DEMOTE 3.LSAD3..DE.,..A.TEU !I3...q. ilA!.F.O.?. L!1TED CCNETE...
~
i
.e
- ga.-
o s
3....
.ce.
p, s
.f..
7 a
, y.,e
- y,.
.s.
.6 s e. :..
,oo. &.
.a.t, :).+ e.,yg w'.
.,
- n.
1
,\\
v m a s * * **.r+
.. v..
/
n
.; d'.7 l
i g. i.
- ~ u.
,:l
.9 3 ' *. <,, '.
g. ',;..
.,..k.
,9 -
2
.p. (shoest,.s i
eso a===a.O..' W. ).r e.'.i. * ?.: Cr.%
. de. -
- (qf y m,d.,.
s,,.
l.,-
r u
~i.. ~~
4-4'.b
- W. H E" Anneen$a.E.
R$9 r
... t %.- -
Q* '~b'dy.y.e S.' pre==.e * * *
.'M.
.' a4
=.
tr.. m n '2 t #7 -.>.:
<;,:g:'.e, :. p. g..
.-A a:
g'1' O
..'6
,,..,,..y,..; 7.. 4 5
~.."
- 4
.i(miiM. T 4&'.j+..I.7
'; C
'. ? *I 's ;.
s.r sep,* s e' s.. ;-l r...
.. ;.g ' md.'.. = ;'
~
It
..,,... :.'.g w a...asn p.
h.
STRam leQ.# *.. ; IY= E4./ 4/4 new. $.
.,N C: *&.. -N.Y ^j,,.
- 'r. s. '4. m. -
,6 t
- *. = ;-'.. ; LoCA 7'IDhl put/ :~i ': ;.'..
j sinans calc.s so.<s;es. ?,.
7.t ":... nev.
~~1b\\$. srn a s even
. ;r.
isp.
.w..a :
-60.8so.wr.4.ne,2M :)r. yNTTf;.m...-}.,g:-
,m-RERGEM-PATitSON MPESUPPO
%d eth i
~r - m,:
e.. :w,.
r
.y.;.y paznm
.m so.,.. seeine T'
,, gg.47g Jgj,.,,; c, susvavam #A. '
.e. ^..;. 3.,,..,,eg,g.;,t
.,, p.25A g.- eues,
.;;. w.
..y.,
- taAsco senv Cas sec fcAA aM.aps ~."* ~ r;-
T Joe nas. 2211 -
nas us. 27.3- %.* i 'i
"*t h
,.ign f..
CAROUNA PWR. E LT.CO..:.SHEARON MARRtB ;. y
<$ r$j' l Mi! [ 55 { SS. f Ly j$ AL. ~ tsus 2.g.g. DT.F'Ral-I4"mkNI.//..
- 3. _: m.
' T{.,i,~..v::es s., ~.
- m. g
..__