IR 05000271/1985038

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:03, 28 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-271/85-38 on 851203-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Nonradiological Chemistry Program, Including Measurement Control & Analytical Procedure Evaluations
ML20140C020
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1986
From: Pasciak W, Zibulsky H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20140B996 List:
References
50-271-85-38, NUDOCS 8601270208
Download: ML20140C020 (5)


Text

_ . _ _ .

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /85-38 Docket N License N OPR-28 Priority -

Category C Licensee: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation R.D. 5, Box 169, Ferry Road Brattleboro, Vermont 05301 Facility Naine: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Vernon, Vermont Inspection Conducted: December 3-5, 1985 Inspector: &&t i huf' l- 13 ~ %

l H. Zibulsky, Ch6dist date Approved by: /l }. . )tu I '2l db W. J. P50ciak, Chief, BWR Radiation / date/

Prote6 tion Section, DRSS /

Inspection Summary: Inspection on December 3-5, 1985 (Report No. 50-271/85-38)

Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the nonradiological chemistry program. Areas reviewed included measurement control and analytical procedure evaluations. The inspection involved 27 inspector hours by one NRC region-based inspecto Results: No violations were identified.

.

8601270200 860122 PDR ADOCK 05000271 G PDR

-,. . _ -. ,. _ _ _ _ ,

T

.

.

DETAILS 1. Individuals Contacted

  • J. Pelletier, Plant Manager
  • M. Prystupa, Plant Chemist S. Jefferson, Assistant Plant Manager R. Leach, Chemistry and Health Physics Supervisor
  • Denotes those present at the exit intervie The inspector also interviewed other licensee employees including members of the chemistry staf . Action on Previous Licensee Findings (0 pen) 85-03-01 IFI (84725) - The licensee did not have a measurement control program with independent standards for calibration and contro The licensee initiated a measurement control program, but control charts for boron, chloride (electrode), iron, nickel, copper, and chromium are needed. This item will remain ope (0 pen) 25-00-13 TI - The Temporary Instruction includes Modules 79501 and 79502. The inspection completed Module 7950 . Measurement Control Evaluation The licensee's measurement control program was verified through analysis of actual plant water samples. The standby liquid control tank and well water were sampled and duplicate samples were sent to Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) for independent verification. Boron analysis will be performed on the standby liquid control tank sample and chloride, silica, iron, nickel, copper, and chromium analyses on the well water sample. On completion of the analyses by both laboratories, a statistical evaluation will be made (Inspector Follow-up Item 85-38-01).

4. Analytica1' Procedures Evaluation During the inspection, standard chemical solutions were submitted by the inspector to the licensee for analysis. The standard solutions were prepared by BNL for NRC Region I, and were analyzed by the licensee using normal methods and equipment. The analysis of standards is used to verify the licensee's capability to monitor chemical parameters in various plant systems with respect to Technical Specification and other regulatory requirements. In addition, the analysis of standards is used to evaluate the licensee's analytical procedures with respect to accuracy and precision.

l l

/

.

The results of the standard measurements comparison indicated that three out of twenty-one analyses were not in agreement under the criteria used for comparing results (see Attachment 1). The disagreements are not considered significant. The differences are less than 6% of the accepted value. The results of the comparisons are listed in Table . Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 5, 1985, and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspecto l

-- - . - . . . _ . . . - . . - - - . - _ - _. --_ _-_ - .

i ..

I i

i
CAPA3ILITY TEST RESULTS

!

VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION i

Ratio

Chemical Parameter NRC Value Lic. Value (Lic./NRC) Comparison Results in partr. per billion (ppb)

i

!

Chloride

! (Specific Ion Electrode) 27.71 .31 .8410.13 Agreement i 20.61 .0 0 0.9710.07 Agreement j 139.416 128.31 .9210.04 Agreement Chloride l (Ion Chromatography) 27.71 .91 .0410.11 Agreement 20.6 .71 .0510.07 Agreement 69.7 3 65.9 .9510.05 Agreement

!

Results in parts'per million (ppm)

! Boron 1014115 10061 .99 0.02 Agreement j 5040t130 4945 58 0.9810.03 Agreement j 3047 26 2923163 0.9610.02 Agreement

Iron

'

3.43t0.21 3.5310.05' 1.0310.06 Agreement i

2.39 0.10 2.30 0.01 0.9610.04 Agreement 1.28 3.09 1.0710.02 0.8410.06 Agreement

'

Copper 3.8410.04 3.9810.03 1.0410.01 - Disagreement 2 2.6010.04 2.6310.01 1.0110.02 Agreement 1.33 0.01 1.28 0.01 0.9610.01 Disagreement ,

I Nickel 3.7910.07 3.8910.01 1.03i0.02 Agreement  ;

i

'

2.5810.13 2.5810.01 1. 0 . . Agreement t 1.3210.16 1.2610.01 0.9510.11 Agreement Chromium 3.74 0.28 3.8510.03 1.0310.08 Agreement i 2.69 0.05 2.5310.01 0.9410.02 Disagreement l 1.20 0.10 1.2310.01 1.0310.09 Agreement

'

l

9 A

- . . . - ..,_._,-_- ,. , , . , _ . . . . , , , _ , , , , . , . _ . . ....-.,.~ , .._m_ . . , ,.,_.y... .-

e

.

.

Al fACilMI:NI Criteria For Comparing Analytical Measurements This attachment provides criteria for comparing results of capability test In these criteria the judgement limits are based on the uncertainty of the ratio of the licensee's value to the NRC value. The following steps are performed:

(1) the ratio of the licensee's value to the NRC value is computed Licensee Value

,

-

(ratio = NRC Value );

(2) the uncertainty of the ratio is propagate If the absolute value of one minus the ratio is less than or equal to twice the ratio uncertainty, the results are in agreemen (ll-ratio l 2 2 uncertainty)

Z-f,thenSz2 = Sx2 + Sy2 Z2 x2 y2

.

(From: Bevington, P. R., Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-liill, New York,1969)

.

f

l