IR 05000271/1988007
| ML20151L953 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1988 |
| From: | Keimig R, Lancaster W, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151L944 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-271-88-07, 50-271-88-7, NUDOCS 8808040196 | |
| Download: ML20151L953 (5) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ SW,120:)Mr ltp.% k [E.
K$mM,4m.n_Sr ~ f , x.4.m . wd. fnouZ 1.jp-ea .z ( CFoa: Z.U ICG) (DA*f,h. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-271/88-07 Docket No.
50-271 , ! License No.
OPR-28 Licensee: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corpoeation R. D. 5, Box 169 Ferry Road Brattleboro, Vermont 05301 Facility Name: Verniont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Vernon, Vermont Inspection Conducted: !iay 23-27, 1988 ,
Date of Last Physical Securi_ty Inspection: October 26-29, 1987 Ackh [hd!$I_ Inspectors: . - i W K La caster, Physical Security Inspector ' d a t'e A A 713ln s.
G. C. Sinith, Safeguards Speciali st / d6te [dI Approved by: ' , R. R. Kei' mig, ' Chief, Saf ards ' date ~
Section, FRSSB, DRSS _Insoection Summary: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspeption on _ May 23-21, 1988 (Report No. 50-271/88-07) Areas Inspected: Management effectiveness, Organization, Security system power ' supply, Physical barriers protected area and vital areas, Lighting, Compensatory measures, Assessment aids, Contingency plan implementation, Protection of safe- , guards information and Program audit.
I r Results: The itcensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas ' examined.
! 8808040196 880710 DR ADOCK 05000271 i PNU i ' _ __- ._.
... _. _ _, - -, - - - - -. -
~ . _.
._ . _ _
c> -. 1- , .. ' . DETAILS 1.
Key Persons Contacted a.
Licensee and Contractor Personnel J Pelletier, Plant Manager R. Pagodin, Technical Services Superintendent J. Sinclair, Plant Services Superintendent T. Linn, Security Supervisor R. Wanezyk, Operations Superintendent R. Grippardi, Qualitty Assurance Superintendent
- C. Langmaid, Chief, Green Mountain Security Services (GMSS)
- W. Jacobson, Assistant Chief, Operation, (GMSS)
- R. Laudry, Assistant Chief, Training, (GMSS)
b.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Personnel ,
- G. Grant, Senior Resident Inspector
' J. Mcdonald, Resident Inspector
- not present at the exit interview The inspectors also interviewed other licensee and contractor security personnel.
2.
Status of Inspector Follow-up Item (Closed) IFI (86-06-01): Licensee to upgrade the assessment aid system to improve assessment capability.
The licensee completed the upgrade on January 1, 1988.
The inspectors verified that the licensee's system was adequate and met the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan).
3.
Management Effectiveness - Security Programs The following actions have been taken by the licensee since the last NRC routine physical security inspection to enhance the existing security program: Increased the licensee's security staff by adding a position
(Access Control Coordinator).
Purchased a security systems training simulator to train and
requalify Central Alarm Station (CAS) and Secondary Alarm Station [ (SAS) Operators.
Revised approximately 26 security procedures to provide GMSS
personnel step-by-step instructions concerning the station's security program. All GMSS personnel have been retrained in the areas affected by the new procedures.
, ,
1 _. - _, , .. _ -,.... - _ - _. _ _ _ - -.-
m . .. , ,
. . A station program has been implemented to conduct an annual review
of all security procedures.
The station's Quality Assurance (0A) Department has become more
involved with the security program and is conducting quarterly audits rather than just the annual audit.
The station's Instrumentation and Control (I&C) Department has
instituted a quarterly Preventative Maintenance (PM) Program to support the security systems and equipment.
3.
Secu?ity Organization The inspectors reviewed the security organization and determined that all positions were filled and that the organization was as depicted in the Plan.
4.
Security System Power Supply The inspectors reviewed the security Uninter uptable Power Supply (VPS) and determined that the system functioned and was tested and maintained as committed to in the Plan.
5.
Physical Barriers - Protected Area The inspector s conducted a physical walk-around of the protected area barrier.
It was determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in the Plan.
6.
Lighting The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of the security lighting system in the protected area and isolation zones on May 25, 1988, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:15 p.m.
The inspectors determined, by observation, that the lighting system was installed and maintained as described in the Plan.
7.
Compensatory Measures The inspectors reviewed the licensee's use of compensatory measures and determined that their use was consistent with the commitments in the Plan.
8.
Assessment Aids The inspectors observed the use of assessment aids in operation at both the CAS and SAS.
I !!S P E DRf M COMI M IS SAIEUU M bS mirm T.
' m SVJi?0s M3UC , MsC1U5'a,li13 GIElliiGHAllY i.If T D L A!.. .,
- . THIS PM.'W90H C0i!TSINS SAFEGUARDS INT 0""I T:3P "913 !!DI FilR PU3 tlc O!SriU302E,li!!liiiElil!0liA!LY LCF1 DLA!il 9.
Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation Review The inspectors determined that the licensee's program for responding to security threats and othar contingencies, as outlined in the Plan, was adequate.
The inspector also reviewed security drill records for 1987 and 1988 and determined that the licensee was identifying deficiencies during these drills and correcting these self identified deficiencies.
The inspectors also noted during the review of these records that the plant operations staff had participated in a significant number of drills.
10.
P_hysical Protection of Safeguards Information The inspectors determined that the licensee's program for protecting safeguards information (SGI) onsite was as outlined in the Plan and is adequate.
In addition, the inspectors physically inspected several SGI repositories onsite and found them to be adequate.
11.
Security Program Audit The inspectors reviewed security program audit reports and verified that the audits had been conducted in accordance with the Plan. The audits were comprehensive in scope with the results reported to the appropriate level of management. The review included the response of the security organization to the audit findings and the corrective action taken to remedy any adverse findings.
The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the findings.
12.
Physical Barriers-Vital k4eas The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of the Vital Area barriers.
The inspectors determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in the Plan.
TH!:."? ' ' '" N P.'iTlE T 5 FECUA.105 INfF l': " T G !!DI KR PilSLIC rEWJ 1, G 0 '.maif 03 ALLY L Ef I C' R"(.
, _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ -. +' .. .5
. . ' I!!!S n T '. CO N m t. U R ?tE T E li:iOT.: T. O tJ:J IS Nei FM FUDUL D!SC1.CiH, !! 15 f.'iTEN!!0;il.ll.Y , [[FI t".nFF., , 13.
Exit Interview . The inspectors met with the licensee representatives indicated in Para-graph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on May 27, 1988, and reviewed the purpose and scope of the inspection and presented the inspection find-ings.
No written material was provided the licensee during this inspection.
! , - t I }}