IR 05000271/1985026

Insp Rept 50-271/85-26 on 850903-06.No Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa Program Implementation in audits,first- Level Insp of Work,Offsite Safety Review Committee, Procurement & shelf-life Controls

ML20133D174
Person / Time
Site:	Vermont Yankee
Issue date:	09/27/1985
From:	Bettehhausen L, Bettenhausen L, Eapen P, Napuda G, Prell J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133D171	List: IR 05000271/1985026 ML20133D167
References
50-271-85-26, NUDOCS 8510080236
Download: ML20133D174 (15)

Text

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /85-26 Docket N License N DPR-28 Licensee: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corpor.: tion RD#5 - Box 169 Ferry Road Brattleboro, Vermont 05301 Facility Name: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Poaer Station Inspection At: Brattleboro and Vernon, Vermont and Framingham, Massachusetts Inspection Conducted: September 3-6, 1985 Inspectors: . k k uh Dr. P. K. Eapen, Chie f, QA Section, DRS 9[o77 $~

' date

, . k. {cbwu g G. Napuda, lead Reattor Engineer Y/8Y

~date 9 h Nal@

h,.Prell,ReactorEhgineer 9/.n / W da'te '

Approved by: MM vh Dr. L. H. Bettsnhausen, Chief, (//2-7/8T date Operations Branch, DRS

~

Inspection Summary: Special Unannounced Inspection Conducted September 3-6, 1985 50-271/85-26 Areas Inspected: Quality Assurance Program implementation in audits, first level inspection of work, offsite safety review committee, procurement, QA surveillance receipt inspection, shelf life controls, vendor controls, and Licensee's actions on previous NRC findings. The inspection involved 114 hours0.00132 days <br />0.0317 hours <br />1.884921e-4 weeks <br />4.3377e-5 months <br /> onsite and 32 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> offsite by two region based inspectors and one region based superviso PDR ADOCK 05000271 G PDR

.

.

Results and Findings: No violations were identified. The team's findings are listed below:

-

The inspection team found the licensee had met commitments contained in response letters (see References in paragraph 13) to the NRC. The status update presented to the NRC Regional Management during an August 7, 1985 meeting, requested by the licensee, was found to be accurate. Speci-

'

fically: The interim corrective actions taken with regards to all safety class items received by or released from the warehouse were comprehensive and timely.

• The procedural revisions adequately addressed NRC concerns and pro-vided sufficient guidance t, and management overview of stores activitie . The training /qualif? cations requirements for receipt inspectors now meet accepted industry standard . Long term program improvements, such as a reference library and measuring cquipment for receipt inspectors, have been establishe . Other long term program improvements, including detailed documenta-tion of receipt inspections, thorough procurement document review cycle, identification and tracking of items requiring periodic

monitoring, and increased receipt inspection staff, have been

! initiated.

I Task forces were established to review problems in receipt inspection and verification of completed work and make recom-mendations as to corrective action and improv2 ment. These reviews were accomplished and their recommendations were accepted with few

,

exceptions.

l The QA audit and surveillance overview was improve . Management recognized the concerns identified by the NRC in Reference 26 and is taking actions to resolve these concern Many of the long term program improvements require additional reviews by the NRC since they have just recently been initiated. A broader sampling base of completed actions under the new program would provide confidence that licensee actions have been effective. The required additional NRC reviews will be conducted during future NRC inspections.

. . _ , _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ , , _ , . , _

.

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation

• G. Gilmore, Storekeeper

• R. Milligan, Administrative Supervisor l

• W. Murphy, Vice President and Manager of Operations

• J. Pelletier, Plant Manager

• C. Porrovecchio, QA Technician

• D. Reid, Operations Superintendent Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC)

• D. Dyer, Operations Quality Group (0QG) Engineer

• J. Callaghan, Systems Group Engineer

• R. Martin, Supervisor, Quality Design and Procurement W. Peterson, Supervisor, QA Engineering Group A. Shepard, Director of QA (Chairman, Offsite Safety Review Committee)

S. White, Quality Design and Procurement Engineer (Acting Supervisor)

D. Yasi, Lead Systems Engineer NRC

• Raymond, Senior Resident Inspector '

Other administrative engineering, I&C maintenance, operations, QA/QC, support and technical employees were interviewed during this inspectio * Denotes those attending the exit intervie . Introduction The NRC identified several concerns in the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station's Receipt Inspection activities during the NRC inspection 50-271/

85-11, conducted on March 11-15, 1985 (Reference 26 in Paragraph 13). An Enforcement Conference was held at the NRC Region I office on April 11, 1985 to discuss the above inspection concerns with the licensee. Subsequently, a notice of violation was issued on April 25, 1985 (Reference 36 in Paragraph 13) detailing violations resulting from the NRC inspection No. 50-271/85-1 On May 29, 1985, the licensee provided a response letter (Reference 31 in paragraph 13) which addressed the concerns identified in the NRC letter dated April 25, 1985. This response included the following commitments: Establishment of a Receipt Inspection Task Force on March 18, 1985 to review the r9ceipt inspection program and make interim and long term corc?ctive action recommendations to the Plant Manager. The Task Force Recommendations were provided to the Plant Manager on May 1, 198 .

O

. __ . .- . . - .. .

.

2 Implement the procedural revisions recommended by the Task Force, by July 10, 198 . Complete the necessary training for the receipt inspection personnel and those personnel involved in the purchase of material and service by the end of July 198 . Make the upgraded Receipt Inspection Program effective by August' 1, 198 . During the interim period, perform a second receipt inspection on previously accepted safety related material prior to 1,s. sue.

Initiate actions to improve the effectiveness of the Vermont Yankee QA program implementing procedures and their administratio . Objectives Purposes of this special team inspection were

$ To conduct the followup team inspection as stated in the NRC Region I Regional Administrator's letter to the Honorable Governor of the State of Vermont dated June 14, 198 . To review the licensee's procurement, receipt, storage and handling program and to assure that these activities are conducted in accord-ance with the NRC requirements and the licensee's commitments, partic-ularly those stated above and; To review the status and adequacy of the licensee's actions planned or taken to improve the effectiveness of the Vermont Yankee's QA  ;

program implementing procedures and their administratio . Procurement of Material and Services t

4.1 Program Review Material and Service Procurement activities are controlled by Administra-tive Procedure (AP) 0800 (Reference 8, paragraph 13). Revision (2) of AP800 dated July 30, 1985 was reviewed. This procedure was developed to J establish controls for procurement activities in accordance with the licensee's QA Topical Report which endorses, 10 CFR 50 Appendix B and ANSI N45.2.13 (Reference 5, paragraph 13) requirements for procurement activities and to incorporate corrective actions recommended by the Task Force.

c

>

I

, -

_- - ,.. .--....,..,.,,,,_.,,.,,.m.,.-_ -

.-._ m, . . __ . . . , . . , , - , .,.,-.,.,,-_..---,.,-m -

_ ._ ._

.

.

Procurement of materials and services are initiated by each Department responsible for ordering materials (except stock items) and services by sending a completed Material and Service Purchase Request (MSPR) to the stores and purchasing supervisor. If the material or services being ordered require quality assurance, requirements of AP 6020 will be invoked. Addi-tionally, the originator of the MSPR will have to complete Appendix A,

" Quality Assurance Requirements" to AP0800. Technical information, such as vendor drawings, catalog data and industry standards to facilitate receipt inspection, will be referenced in or attached to the MSPR For safety related stock items, the store keeper is required to initiate the MSPR and forward it to the stores QA technician. The QA technician is required to complete the MSPR, review it for appropriate technical content

!

and return it to the Stores Supervisor for processing. Materials or ser-vices requiring no quality assurance are ordered by forwarding a MSPR or computer reorder report to the stores supervisor for processin All MSPRs are signed by the originator and routed to the applicable depart-ment head, plant superintendent or plant manager for approval. Specific approval requirements for different types of services and material are specified on page14 of AP080 The ordering department is responsible for ensuring that a safety related item has not been identified by the vendor or the NRC as a potentially defective item. Additionally, the ordering department is required to verify that previously identified nonconformance conditions are corrected

, prior to placing the orde Completed MSPRs are routed to the Brattleboro Operations Group for revie The Operations Support Group conducts their review of the MSPR using OPVY 102 (Revision 2) guidelines. Upon completion of the review, the Operations Support Group forwards the MSPR for a review by the Framingham Operations Quality Assurance (0QA) Group. If necessary, Brattleboro office will also forward the MSPR for a Veview by Framingham YAEC engineers. YAEC engineering reviews the MSPR using the guidelines of Procedure WE-20 Upon completion of the reviews, Framingham returns the MSPR to Brattlebor The Brattleboro operation engineer reviews both engineering and 00A comments and recommends statements for inclusion in the purchase order. The Operations Support Manager approves Framingham comments and forwards them to the site QA. The site QA assures that the operations engineers recommendations were consistent with engineering and 00A comment The completed and reviewed original MSPR is returned to the stores superviso From this MSPR a purchase order is prepared and routed for approval to the applicable Department Head and site QA. The purchase order is then signed by the purchasing agent, approved by proper authority, and issued to the vendor. The procured goods are received and inspected using the requirements of procedure AP 0801. Storage of received goods is in accordance with procedure AP 0803. Material issued from storage is controlled by procedure

. AP 0806 (Revision 3). Training of personnel involved in procurement, receipt, storage and handling is controlled by procedure DP 0811. (Revision 2).

s

_._,.-.----~c , , - - - , , , . . - - , , . , . , . _ . , - -

ym- - . . _ , - - , - - - - _.m .._y.- - , - . - . . . . . ~ . . , _ , - - - . ~ - - . - - - . , . - - - , .

- . . . - - _ . - -.

_. ._ . ..

< .

'

.

4.2 Implementation Review

The following Purchase Orders (PO) packages were examine These P0s met the licensee procedure and ANSI N45.2.13 requirement PO 25545, Switchgear Charging Motor

--

P0 25550, Tip Ball Valve

--

P0 25575, Snubbers and Seal Kit

--

P0 25576, Manway Engineering for Pipe Replacement

--

P0 25580, Heise CM Gauge

--

P0 25586, Edgewise Meter

--

P0 25802, Limitorque Motor

--

P0 25584, Filter Liner i

The above P0s were reviewed with the originator, QA reviewers and engineer-ing reviewers to determine the level of involvement, understanding, and knowledge of these individuals in the revised material and service procure-

, ment program. It was verified that these individuals were knowledgeable of the new procurement requirement No violations were identified.

i Receipt Inspection J

5.1 Program Review The site receipt inspection program is controlled by the Administrative Procedure (AP) 0801 (Reference 9). As stated in Reference 31, the licen-see has revised this procedure to provide better guidance to receipt in-spection personnel and to preclude recurrence of the violation identified in reference 36. On March 18, 1985, the licensee formed a Receipt Inspec-tion Task Force to review the Receipt Inspection Program and to make recom-

'

mendations to the plant manager for programmatic improvements. The task force was also responsible for developing short and long term recommenda-

<

tions that would enhance or otherwise improve the receipt inspection pro-gram.

The inspectors reviewed the revised Receipt Inspection Program as documented

-

in Revision 14 to AP 0801, issued on July 30, 1985. Additionally, the inspectors selected previously received items, as detailed below, to verify

-

the effectiveness of the revised program. The inspectors witnessed receipt

'

'

inspections for two items received under the revised progra Findings of this review are detailed belo '

5.2 Receipt Inspection Interim Measures In Reference 31, Vermont Yankee committed to the NRC to perform the following interim receipt inspection measures until a long-term program could be developed and implemente These interim actions were initiated on March 15, 1985.

.

1, - --, m --.-.3.-.---,,---r-. - . - - . - - , . 9.r#e_.,- ,.r. , , , . _ , , 3 .s,... . , -, ,,.--.e ..- p. ,-.-._,-r,.i, ,- - , ,- ,_,_ ,-... e-%.,,--,,cee- +.--e,

-

i

.

(1) The development of receipt inspection guidelines to supplement the existing Vermont Yankee (VY) receipt inspection procedure and the associated checklist. These guidelines were incorporated into Admi-nistrative Procedure (AP) 0801 on March 20, 198 It was determined that the inspection guidelines provide guidance for electrical and mechanical receipt inspections and associated documentation. Guidance on most of the characteristics identified in ANSI N45.2.2 was provided, such as performing dimensional measurements, physical properties checks, weld preparation checks, workmanship inspections, lubrication checks, and documentation reviews. See paragraph 5.7 for further discussion of the characteristics not listed in the procedur (2) One hundred percent receipt inspections of all safety class items received beginning March 18, 1985 and ending on May 15, 1985, when an appropriate sampling program was approved and established. The inspectors verified this by reviewing received goods, on a sampling basis. An acceptable sampling plan was developed and provided to the receipt inspectors in Revision 14 to procedure AP-080 (3) A complete examination of the warehouse to determine if additional safety class material existed which may not have been receipt inspect-ed. Items received under twenty two purchase orders were identified as not receipt inspected and a second receipt inspection was ordered for these item The NRC inspector reviewed the Purchase Order files for the above 22 items and verified a second receipt inspection had been done. In addition, the inspector went to the warehouse and verified, based on a sample of eight of the 22 items, that a 100% inspection had been performed for these item (4) Develop a list of safety related items stored with a desiccan This list is to be used in performing periodic inspections to assure the desiccant has not been expende A log has been developed which lists items in the warehouse stored with dessiccants and the date when they were last inspected. AP 0803, Storage of Materials and Equipment, now requires items stored with desiccants to be tracked and inspected as necessary. Form VYAPF 0803.01, used for periodic inspections and preventive maintenance of stored items, has been modified to clearly identify desiccant inspection (5) Perform a second receipt inspection of all safety class items prior to their release from stores to the plan A review of all Material Issue Slips between February 15, 1985 and .

May 15, 1985, was made to identify safety related items issued from l the warehouse. The purchase order files for thirty-one safety class 1 items were reviewed and it was verified that all items had received a second receipt inspection. On May 15, 1985, in a memorandum from the plant manager, this requirement was rescinded, as no problems were identifie J l

.

.

.

(6) Place all eleven P.O. items identified in NRC inspection report num-

ber 50-271/85-11 into a " Material Hold" area and perform a second receipt inspectio A review of the eleven P.O. files was made. It was determined through '

review of a second receipt inspection checklist and copies of Material Hold Tags that a second receipt inspection had taken place and the items had been placed in the Material Held are This was verified by reviewing these items in the warehouse to determine if their boxes had been opened and seals broke .3 Quality Assurance Technicians (QATs)

The present commitment through the Quality Assurance Topical Report

'

for qualification and training of QA technicians who perform receipt inspections is to ANSI N 18.1-197 Subsequent to the NRC inspection (50-271/85-11), the licensee revised their training procedure for stores personnel, DP 0811, to incorporate the training requirements of ANSI N45.2.6 and to require annual review trainin The training files of store personnel were reviewed and a receipt inspection by the storekeeper was-witnessed using the new receipt inspection procedures. Based on the above, it was concluded that the training program was effective and that it met the applicable NRC requirements and licensee's commitment The QAT job description and DP0811 still reference the ANSI N1 requirements without mentioning the incorporation of ANSI N45. In discussions with plant management, they indicated that this was an oversight and that the appropriate procedures and job description would be revised to reflect ANSI N45.2.6 qualification requirement This is an unresolved item awaiting incorporation of ANSI N45. requirements in to the QAT qualification documents. (271/85-26-01).

One recommendation to come out of the Receipt Inspection Task Forc (Reference 28) was that "... in order to effectively administer the recommendations contained in this report a minimum of two full time receipt inspectors, dedicated to the receipt inspection process, will be necessary". In the May 15, 1985 VY memorandum (Reference 29), the VY Plant Manager stated that " Approval for additional permanent full

time manpower will be pursued promptly with the Vice President and

'

Manager of Operations". In a June 4, 1985 memorandum (Reference 32)

from the Administration Supervisor to the Plant Manager a proposed reorganization structure was made showing 2 QATs and 1 Senior QA This would increase the number of QATs on site from one to three. The two QATs would be dedicated to receipt inspection and the Senior QAT would review MSPRs and the QATs receipt inspection work. At the time of this inspection, one QAT position had been approved by the Manager of Operations and the Senior QAT position description was on his desk for review and approval. The President of Vermont Yankee has to ap-prove both positions. The Manager of Operations stated that the staffing plan for QATs will be dispositioned by October 1, 198 This is an unresolved item awaiting full staffing of the QAT and Senior QAT positions' (271/85-26-02).

- - - .- - . - - .

.. - . .- , .- . _ _ - -

. - - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ ,

-_ -__

.

.

5.4 Reference Material for Receipt Inspection A vendor catalog file has been established which includes industry standards such as ASTM, ASME, ANSI, MIL-S-105D and Manufacturers Standard Specification The CASE Register is also availabl Automatic Controls, Electrical Supplies, Instrument and Electronic Controls are typical of the approximately twenty categories listed on an index into which library contents have been divided along with

,

item locations.

,

5.5 Measuring and Test Equipment An inventory of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) is now available and being used by the receipt inspection group. A calibration due date log, serialization of individual equipment, access to the ' equip-ment and other M&TE controls have been established. A final decision

.

is pending whether to utilize the Maintenance calibration control

'

procedure or develop a sep.cate one for the Stores grou .6 _ Shelf Life Program for Received Goods The status of the Shelf Life Study was re~ viewed and it was noted that approximately two thirds of warehoase stock had been evaluated for shelf lif The evaluation of the items actual shelf life is to.be done by a contractor. A bid proposal has been distributed for this effor Items issued for use, whose ' shelf life has not yet been determined, are examined by the user group to verify their suitability for the intended application.

.

5.7 Verification of the Implementation of Receipt Inspection Program The P0s listed below, that were processed in accordance with revised procedures, were examined to determine if receipt inspection and handling conformed to VY commitments described in their letter to the

NRC dated May 29, 198 '

e

--

.P0 24462, Range Leak Test Monitor

--

PO 24655, Fuel Channel Fasteners

--

P0 24498, Stainless Steel Tubing

--

PO 25184, Battery s

No violations were identified. However, during the review of the revised Receipt Inspection Checklist (RIC) versus ANSI. N45.2.2-1972 inspection requirements, it was noted that the following characteris-tics were not addressed in the RIC: Physical properties, weld pre-parations, workmanship, lubricants and oils and electrical insulatio Except for electrical insulation, these characteristics wer.e, however,

'

addressed in the General Inspection Guidelines. The RIC does not

,

formally require that the received items be inspected for those char-acteristics in the General Inspection Guidance. As a result there is s

a i

.n- w -- - - . , ,. , , - , , - - - - , , . . - . . , - , ,- -. , , , - - , - . - . - - - - , - - , - --

- .

.

.

4 no assurance that an item was receipt inspected against the General Inspection Guidelines. In addition, the guidance does not contain electrical insulation inspections attributes. Management agreed that the RIC and General Inspection Guidelines need to be revised to satisfy

' <' the above concerns. This is an unresolved item awaiting NRC review of the revised RIC and General Inspection Guidelines (271/85-26-03).

6. Installation of R'eceived Goods The following records associated with the installation of the Tip Ball Valve (P0 45550) were examined to determine if YOQAP-1-A requirements were met and AP 0021 controls were implemente Maintenance Request (MR) 85-1574

--

Material Issue (MI) 08A0085

--

Operating Procedure (0P) 6023.01

-

--

Inspection Report 85-111 (Operations QA)

, No violations were identified. However, the responsibility and the intent for signing off the " Inspection / Hold Points Completed by" block on the MR

< form was not clearly specified. As a result, these blocks are signed off

.

'

s

_ by sdifferent personnel and different organizations. VY management stated-this would be reviewed and appropriate action taken to clarify the require-

.

} merit ( s) . Pending further review this is an unresolved item (271/85-26-04).

.1

'

, Vendor Control

-

, Yankee Atomic, Quality Design and Procurement Group, has the responsibility 9( ) .for maintaining the Approved Vendors List (AVL). Approved vendors unaergo

'a'tsiennial audit to remain on the AVL. The determination as to whether a vendor is placed on the AVL is based on one or more of the following as determ'ined by the audit: (1) The vendor has a history of providing satis-factory products, (2) the vendor has an approved QA Program based on 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria or (3) the vendor has a technical and quality assurance program which satisfies the concerns of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B criteri Procurement of safety related items from unapproved vendors are treated as simplistic item Simplistic items are items where: the vendor has no 10 CFR Part 21 requirements,

, the vendor does not supply a certificate of conformance,

' the item is suitable for receipt inspection and the receipt inspection would nut adversely affect the ite For simplistic items the burden for assuring quality rests with receipt inspection. Site QA witnesses the receipt inspection for simplistic items.

J

- - ,-, , -, --..m . y ,_,m -.,---,,,.r,. - - - . - . - , - - - , , - - , , . - . . , - . - - . . - . - - - - . - , - - , < , . , - -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______

_____ -

.

.

/

1 l l For non-simplistic items, Sequirements are placed in the purchase order I for the vendor to notify YAEC 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> prior to shipment of the item. YAEC i then goes to the vendor ano performs a nrveillance audit of the vendor's facility. A review of several P.O. files confirmed that this requirement had been placed in the P.O. and that YAEC had performed the required surveillance, j

As of 1985, YAEC became a member qf CASE. A review of the AVL verified that it is being maintained current reghing reaudits of vendors and deletion l of formerly approved vendor . Offsite Safety Review Committee The Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Committee (NSARC) was interviewed and meeting minutes 85-2-S and 85-6-R were reviewed to determine the level and types of NSARC involvement in problem areas. The entire audit report, a semi-annual trend report and monthly activity reports are now forwarded to NSARC members. A member of the QA Department gives a presen-tation at each NSARC meeting. A proposal to require each committee member to be responsible for reviewing audit findings, followups, and proposed corrective actions in an assigned area is to be voted on at the October, 1985 meetin The committee held special meeting 85-2-S to review and evaluate adverse findings identified during an audit of Project Engineering. Each finding was discussed with the audit team leader, significance and cause of the findings were established, and corrective action adequacy was determine The results, corrective actions and investigations associated with NRC Inspection 271/85-11 violations were discussed during meeting 85-6- These meetings indicate that the committee does become involved in the review of identified problem No violations were identifie . QA/QC Interfaces and Audits As stated in Reference 31, the licensee recognized the need for a review of the adequacy of controls provided by the implementing procedures of the QA Topical Report. On June 7, 1985, the licensee requested the required review from YAEC. This review is presently scheduled to be completed by January,1986. The effectiveness of this review will be assessed during future routine NRC inspection The in plant audit schedule for 1985 lists seventeen routine audits. Twelve audits have been completed, including the first phase of the procurement audit. This audit was planned to review the recently revised procedures for their compliance to the YQAP Topical QA Report and applicable standard The second phase will examine the implementation of these procedures. The following audit packages were examined to determine adherence and compliance to ANSI N45.2.12 and established procedure '

i

t

--

VY-85-08A, Procurement and Material Control

--

VY-85-11, Inspection and Test-Yankee Atomic Operational Quality Assurance Group has modified their system for performing audits of nuclear facilitie The modified approach places greater emphasis on determining what the higher tier documents require, e.g.,

ANSI standards, 10 CFR Part 50, ASME standards, technical specifications, FSAR, etc., and then verifying that the plant's procedures adequately cover or meet these requirements. Only a small implementation review is conducte Major verification of proper implementation of the procedures is done through periodic surveillances conducted by the sites Operation Quality Group. This approach has been used since the first part of 1985 and has already resulted in identification and resolution of several procedural deficiencie No violations were identified. However, Audit VY 85-11 identified a number of problems in the areas of inspection acceptance criteria and first level inspections. The plant's initial response has been rejected by QA. Also, the revised procurement process has not yet been audited completely. Pend-ing review of the adequacy and timeliness of corrective actions associated with Audit VY-85-11 and the results of Audit VY-85-088 this is an unre-solved item (271/85-26-05).

1 Status of Previous Inspection Findings (0 pen) Violation (85-11-01). Failure to conduct adequate receipt inspec-tions and periodic examinations of stored item The licensee's corrective actions described in their May 29, 1985 letter to the NRC were reviewed and are discussed in previous sections of this report. The following is an outline of the corrective actions contained in that letter and the re-

, suits observe . Interir corrective actions and results achieved with respect to re-ceipt inspectio The described actions were accomplishe . Receipt Inspection Task Forc The task force was established and completed its assignmen . Corrective action to prevent recurrenc '

These actions were initiate . Dates of full complianc Actions were implemented as state . Reinspection and engineering evaluations to assure adequacy of installe3 and stored item These actions were completed.

' Improve QA Program effectivenes These actions were initiated.

t

, . - - . . - _ . - _m... m, ,, .- ._m.m. ,_ _ _ .-._-_,,,,,_,m- ,__,,,.-,...-.v,,, - , -. . m ,, --,r---.y,-,.~ -

.. .

.

.

This area will be reviewed during a future NRC inspection to assure the continued compliance with the improved program and the effectiveness of

management action This item remains ope (0 pen) Unresolved Item (271/84-23-02). Evaluation of shelf life provi-sions for stored items not yet included in the shelf life progra Based on the discussion in paragraph 4.5 this item remains ope (0 pen) Unresolved Item (271/84-23-03). Evaluation of shelf life provi-sions for items containing non-metallic part Based on the discussion in paragraph 4.5 this item remains ope . Unresolved Items s Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable, deviations or violation Unresolved iten 5 identified during this inspection are discussed in para-graphs 5.3, 5.7, 6 and 9.

,

12. Management Meetings Litensee management was informed of the scope and purpose of the inspection at an entrance interview conducted on September 3, 1985. The findings of the inspection were periodically discussed with licensee representatives during the course of the inspection. An exit interview was conducted on September 6, 1985 at the conclusion of the inspection (see paragraph I for attendees) at which time the findings were presented to licensee managemen At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector . References / Documents 4 ANSI N18.1-1971, Selection and Training of Nuclear Power Plant Person-nel

- ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.2.-1972, Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage and Hand-

-ling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.6-1978, Qualifications of Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel For Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Po,ter Plants

,. - .-. . - - - - - . - . - . - . - .- . - . _ , . . . - _ - . _ . - - . -

. .-

.

.

12 Yankee Operational Quality Assurance Manual (Y0QAP-1-A) ' -

- AP-0021, Revision 12, Maintenance Requests

' Admiistrative Procedure (AP) - 0800, Revision 12, Material and Service Procurement AP-0801, Revision 14, Receipt, Inspection, and Shipment of Material and Equipment 10. AP-0802, Devision 8, Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and Components 11. AP-0803, Revision 9, Storage of Materials and Equipment 12. .AP-0806, Revision 3, Issuing and Returning of Material, Parts and Components 13. AP-6020, Revision 10, Material and Service Purchase Approval 1 Department Procedure (DP) - 0811, Revision 2, Administrative Depart-ment Personnel Training 15. Operational Procedure Vermont Yankee (0PVY)-102 Revision 2, Material and/or Service Purchase Requests 16. Operational Quality Assurane (0QA)-XVIII-3, Revision 14, Vendor Audits 17. 0QA-XVIII-4, Revision 11, Vendor Surveillances 18. OQA-XVIII-6, Revision 3, Vendor Re-Audits 19. WE-004, Revision 4, Training 20. WE-104, Revision 4, Qualification Tests 21. WE-200, Revision 8, Material and/or Service Purchase Request 22. WE-202, Revision 4, Technical Evaluation of Vendors 23. WE-203, Request for Bids 24. WE-204, Revision 4, Evaluation of Bids 25. WE-204, Revision 7, Procurment of Services 26. NRC Inspection Report No. 50-271/85-11, dated April 2, 1985

- . . . _ ._- . - - - . - , .- . _ , , . - - , , . - - - . _ , -,

_ -_ _ - - - - _ ._ .. .-

.

13

'

2 VY Memorandum from D. C. Gurroir to R. F. Milligan dated March 27, 1985 entitled " Receipt Inspection - Evaluation of NRC Identified Items" 28. VY Memorandum from R. F. Milligan to J. P. Pelletier dated April 29, 1985 entitled " Receipt Inspection Task Force Recommendations Report" 2 VY Memorandum from I. P. Pelletier to Distribution dated May 15, 1985 entitled " Disposition of Receipt Inspection Task Force Report Recom-mendations"

, 3 VY Letter from Warren P. Murphy to Dr. Thomas E. Murley (IVRC) dated May 23, 1985 subject " Report Requested Under 10 CFR 50.54(f) Concern-

ing Apparent False Documentation of Results of Receipt Inspections" 3 VY Letter (FVY 85-48) from Warren P. Murphy to Dr. Thomas E. Murley (NRC) dated May 29, 1985 entitled " Response to Notice of Violation and Enforcement Conference 50-271/85-11 3 VY Memorandum from R. F. Milligan to J. P. Pelletier dated June 4, ,

1985 entitled " Proposed Stores Organizational Structure" 3 YA-F Memorandum from D. J. Ivins to R. F. Milligan dated June 21, 1985 34. YA-F Memorandum from G. K. Beampie to Listees dated July 2,1985 entitled "1984/1985 Annual Review of Vendor Performance" 35. Job Description - Stores Quality Assurance Technician

36. NRC Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Murley to Warren P. Murphy, dated April 25, 1985, Subject: Notice of Violation and Enforcement Conference Report.

,

-= ,- .. __ , , . - , , %..,___mm, , . , , y, ~ , ....,y s.,,, , , -- ,. . ., ..- , _ , . . _ .

_ . . - - ,m, ,