IR 05000271/1985012
| ML20127D285 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1985 |
| From: | Joshua Berry, Keller R, Kister H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127D270 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-271-85-12, NUDOCS 8506240183 | |
| Download: ML20127D285 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:r - n -{). O ' U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT EXAMINATION REPORT NO.
85-12 (OL) FACILITY DOCKET NO.
50-271 FACILITY LICENSE NO.
DPR-28 LICENSEE: Vermont Yankee Power Corporation FACILITY: Vermont Yankee EXAMINATION DATES: March 18, 1985 - March 21, 1985 PREPARED BY:
- Y '[d'
wm
J[A erry,1.e4 eac Engineer (Examiner) date REVIEWED BY: Y !
R. 'M.
Keller, Chief, Projects Section 10 date APPROVED BY: 8/7 H'. B. Kifth Chief, Projects-Branch No.1 ' d(te SUMMARY: Operator licensing examinations were administered to five Reactor Operator candidates the week of March 18, 1985.
All five candidates passed both the oral and written exams. The R0 candidates did very well on the oral exams, demonstrating a strong. depth of knowledge.
8506240183 B50603 PDR ADOCK 05000271 G PDR
g.
o o REPORT DETAILS TYPE 10F, EXAMS: Replacement EXAM RESULTS:
R0 l l Pass / Fail l
I I l l IWritten Exam l 5/0 l
1 I I I I 10ral Exam l 5/0
l l I I i 10verall I .5/0 l l l l
1
1.
CHIEF EXAMINER AT SITE: B. Hajek 2.
OTHER EXAMINERS: J. 'A. Berry, USNRC - Region I . 3.
Exit-Interview Details .NRC Personnel Present H. B. Kister, Chief, Projects Branch No. 1 J. A. Berry, Lead Reactor Engineer (Examiner) 'W. Raymond,. Senior Resident Inspector-- NRC Contractor Personnel B. Hajek, NRC Consultant Examiner Facility Personnel W.:P.. Murphy,'Vice. President and Manager of Operations.
R.~ Spinney, Training Manager D. Reid, Operations Supervisor-E. Lindamood,: Training Department Instructor
. a
r- "N (-)x (d
( ..
4.
Summary of Comments Made at Exit Interview The Chief Examiner noted that all five candidates would be recommended as clear. passes on the oral examinations.
It was noted by both examiners that the five candidates demonstrated a deep knowledge level of the facility and its operations.
The Vermont Yankee Vice President expressed some concern over the unfavor-able results of the SRO class in January.
5.
Changes Made to Written Exam During Examination Review All changes made to the written examination as a result of the exam review are documented in the attached Master Examination.
Attachments: 1.
Written Examination and Answer Key (RO) 2.
Facility Comments on Written Examinations Made After Exam Review, and NRC Resolution
_. - _ __ .. _.. _ _ _ _ - - _,, .. _ _. _ _ - _ _ _ _ .
E.
O O - .- ATTACHMENT 2 NRC Resolution of Facility Comments - Question 1.5 Comment considered during grading.
- Question 1.6 Other considerations received credit i f discussed - correctly.
' Question 1.9 - Comment accepted as additional correct answers.
- Question 2.3 Comment noted.
- . Question 2.4 Comment accepted, answer key revised to indicate that ADS - - will not be affected, but automatic relief operation will.
Question 3.2 Comment rejected. Proposed answer is outside the bounds of reason.
- . Question 3.5 Answer. Key revised to indicate that the FW control valves - . may drift, and that the MSIV accumulators may preclude MSIV l closing.
, > I 4, ' + t I' l J <
- s
1 ' l i ' , .i - j C iy ' , 'MI e + j ' t- ! -
L ,a -- e,-~ -e <,4 -, e-w.- w a ---r . --- 'gr=.'--so,ngwr n-- y-m ,amn-e9,- - ,g,+ ww, - - -, - -,* . }}