ML19344D874

Urges Reconstitution of ASLB to Commence Hearings Due to Unavailability of Present Board.Fair Weight Must Be Given to Interests of Applicant,Ratepayers,Shareholders & Natl Energy Policy.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19344D874
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	08/22/1980
From:	Newman J LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS, AXELRAD & TOLL
To:	Lazo R Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-CP, NUDOCS 8008260217
Download: ML19344D874 (5)

Text

'

e A LAW OFFICES  %

n J

LOWENSTEIN, NEWM AN, REIs, AxELRAD & Tott soa5 CONNECTICu? AvtNuc. sa.w.

/N gs g, 3 ,

n ~

n morter Lowt=stre= WASHINGTON. D.C. 2O O36 O//r C[9' > .

JaCs n.est==a= -

","~h by.I ' i asoLo F. acis -

waveiCr an stnao 202 e 862-8400 g y David e. TOL L ' ?/

RATeekt t es os. Ses ta s J.A.Govamient,Ja.

,s p

terC*eaEL a. S4WSE R t OIEGOmv saaeets AL&Ent v Camm Je

&seset w COT?teeGesaw Kaf ee k t E se a. C O s ROit#Te* CwLp PET E R Q. FLVeses wsLLeans J. P pacestatee CTEVEN P.FeaNT2

'",','"'.**o*."'c'. August 22, 1980

. La oavio S n a s. no The Honorable Robert Lazo Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Re: In the Matter of Houston Iiighting & Power Company (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket No. 50-466 l

Dear Mr. Chairman:

l At a prehearing conference in the subject docket held

! pursuant to 10 CFR 2.752 on August 13, 1980, the chair I denied a motion submitted by the Applicant to establish a schedule for the commencement of evidentiary hearings.

Applicant immediately requested reconsideration of the ruling since it had the effect of deferring the start of hearings in this matter until, at the earliest, sometime in mid-January, 1981.*/ In denying the motion for reconsider-ation, the chair indicated that the central reason for the I

extended delay was the unavailability of the Board between November 1, 1980, and mid-January, 1981.**/ The Board explained that even if Applicant and StaH were to withdraw pending motions for summary disposition, the Board's decision to delay the commencement of evidentiary hearings would not l

be affected because the Board's calendar did not permit it to hold hearings during the latter part of 1980.

l */ Tr. 1748

• • / Tr. 1790-92

\

""seco 2i7 G

LOWENZTEIN, NEWM AN, HEIE. AXELHAD & TOLL s

The Honorable Robert L9zo August 22, 1980 Page Two With minor exceptions, all discovery in this proceeding was closed on July 9, 1980. (Discovery on some contentions has been permitted for over a year.) The NRC Staff, after meeting with the Applicant and then with several of the intervening parties, submitted to the ASLB on July 18, 1980, a proposed schedule under which hearings relating to site suitability and environmental matters would have commenced on October 21, 1980, more than three months after the close of discovery. Under this proposed schedule, contentions and Board questions relating to health and safety matters would not have been heard until early 1981. Applicant's motion (copy attached) set forth in some detail the reasons why the proposed schedule did not impose an unfair burden on any party and requested the ASLB to adopt the Staff's proposal.

It is clear that the delay resulting from the Board's ruling at the recent prehearing conference has not beenThe imposed in order to avoid unduly burdening any party.

principal, if not the sole, reasonApplicant is the conflicting is in no respon-position sibilities of the Board members.

to assess priorities among the resources available to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel and, in any event, would not presume to do so. It is a plain fact, however, that the public interest in the timely We conduct do not of this that suggest proceeding has not been well served.

past delay in this proceeding is attributable substantially to problems in the Board's availability; however, the Allens Creek proceeding has been awaiting trial for three years since the Board was informed of its reactivation in 1977.

At some point a balance must be struck in establishing l

i priorities which gives fair weight to the interests of the applicant utility, its ratepayers and shareholders and, of course, national energy policy.

For these reasons, Houston L.ghting & Power Company urges that the members of tb ? Board appointed for this proceeding be relieved of their conflicting responsibilities or that, in all fairness, the Board be reconstituted so that 1

LowzNsTzzw, NEWM AN, R es s. AXELR AD & Tot.r.

s The Honorable Robert Lazo August 22, 1980 Page Three hearings may begin and be conducted through this fall.

Respectfully submitted,

,- hW an Jack R. Ne Attorney for Applicant Houston Lighting & Power Company Attachment cc (w/ attachment):

The Honorable John Ahearne Howard Shapar, Esquire Service List l

(

f

• 8-07-80

~

A

~

'. cp O/

O UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION fj Doe #ETEo

, Og.,.g g

^VG7 ,4 0!-

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD &

h O In the Matter of ) g e

) 4 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER ) Docket No. 50-466 COMPANY )

)

(Allens Creek Nuclear )

Generating Station, Unit )

No. 1) )

APPLICANT'S MOTION TO SET A SCHEDULE FOR COMMENCING EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS On July 18, 1980, the Staff addressed a letter to the Licensing Board concerning a meeting among the Staff, 8

Applicant and several of the intervenors held on July 10, to discuss a schedule for the completion of prehearing l

procedures and the commencement of evidentiary hearings.

In its letter, the Staff set forth a proposed schedule based l

upon discussions with the Applicant, and modified to reflect concerns raised by the intervenors at the July 10, meeting.

The Staff also proposed that the Board hold a Prehearing Conference to discuss the proposed schedule. The Board's

" Order Scheduling Prehearing Conference" dated July 22, adopted the Staff's latter proposal and set a Conference date of August 13, 1980, in ordi- . _ _ _ _ _ .

due dates for the responses to i l DUPLICATE DOCUMENT ,

):

sition; (2) establishingdatesfi Entire document previously entered into system under:

lj

(

N ANO $OO% RO 6 \O C

DM If No. of pages:

pgg $ (( O ]

. _ -