ML20126K667

Forwards Admitted Emergency Planning Contention,Schuessler Consolidated Contention 1

ML20126K667
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	05/18/1981
From:	Black R NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:	Cosgrove D Federal Emergency Management Agency
References
NUDOCS 8105200190
Download: ML20126K667 (4)

Text

_m I

y['pm mtC o

UNITED STATES g,

{'

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION pC WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

.y) gv /!

o a...+

)

May 18, 1981 gh D

i~(,-

ebq,\\

l I

S Daniel Cosgrove, Esq.

M

>E-Assistant General Counsel

-\\

Federal Emergency Management Agency Ql,lx

(',}f V

Dffice of General Counsel 1/25 I Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20472 In the Matter of Houston Lighting and Power Company (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1)

Docket No. 50-466

Dear Mr. Cosgrove:

Pursuant to our conversation today, enclosed is a copy of the emergency planning contention that has been admitted in the Allens Creek proceeding.

As can be seen by looking at the contention, certain sections of the contention have not been admitted by the Licensing Board (Sections I, II, III(d), V (sentence dealing with possible radioactive contamination of Brazos River water), and VI). The Allens Creek site is' located approximately 45 miles west of downtown Houston between the towns of Sealy and Wallis.

A site location map is also enclosed.

Hearings on this contention have not been scheduled as of tnis date.

The llRC Staff expects that this issue will be scheduled in early Fall 1981.

I will keep you informed on this matter.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 492-7417.

Sincerely, o

Sg( "

hh/c.

Richard L. Black Counsel for NRC Staff Enciosures: As Stated Till3 0000MEtlT CONTAINS P00R QUAllTY PAGES j G

Schuersl er Consolidated Centention 1

' $yt(el '

I.

Appli cant's Enviro 2rnental Report and PSAR, and 7 },

'p I i

NRC's FES r.nd SER, in regard t o emergency plan-M

()M ning, fail to comply with provisions of 3 0 CF,R Part 50_, Aupendix R, and 10 CFR Pa__rt 100. as (to c(I be) amended.

gQ)W II.

Applicant fails to demonstrate any capability

,' f(j

[

]i tl of safely eveuating the Houston area in the lv\\

event of an ACNGS accident of any magnitude up to and including' Class 9.

.CNGS fails to adequateky caet requirements of III.

10 CFR Part 100, regarding siting, for reasons which include, but are not limited to, the following:

(a) Applicant fails to adequately g

~ Q' recognize that metropolitan Houston is the f astest-growing area in the U. S., steadily and rapidly expanding teward the site of ACNGS; (b) The proposed site of ACNGS is not presently sufficiently remote, and will become even less

'so during its operating life; (c) Traffic con-gestion at present and for the foreseeable i

future prevents any ef fective, timely emergency M...f

j b cvacuation of the greater Houston are,a, or any V

s."1

- substantial part thereof;[((d) The State of' obll'fd

~~

Texas has no tested and approv ed evacuation n

l plan for nuclear emergencies; and (c) The

._. 6 di stance from ACSGS to population center should be much greater 'than 1 1/3 x L?Z because of

~

l' ryecial circu astances cited a*:ove.

eh ; q c,.g

'i.ie ih.'.R f[.i: [ t o n e t :..., d ;.

1,1 ;

IV.

that it fails to f ^ TE. 50, l ppf.ndiyJ,_T L in i

assure the compatibility of e-.-rr,ency plans with site location, acce s s rout es,,;opulation j

distribution and land use.

The PSAR and the selection of the proposed site' V.

M 0'N do not properly consider population density,

1. galN 80 land use, physical characteris tics [fpossibic,

7. jg i radioactive contamination of ' Brazos uxw r water),g (g

thereby failing to adequate 7 y insure low risk of public exposure as required by 10 CFR Part 100.10.

,hJO g

a construction

/UM The Board should deny App 1'icapt I

17Igo i

1 VI.

are met, and

-} i permit until the~se requirements Intervenors contend that these requirements can--

(y4 not be met at this prcposed site.

0 l

e se l

9 l~

l l

l

n

+ m= = =

,= -.~

x.

y r

4 i

4 4,

I q

E5-te4R 4,

s, <

I._

%s4

,.7. r.,. :_,

g. __. 2, a.-

... -...s..

i a

i

.;=

e

,!, m.

e

,=., w m

~

4 7T

.g.

..x = t

+.

..... - ?

,,c.

p...

e.

\\ '.. '~~~

.,$. g..,.

-f

,/ t.

~

'~isoUSTON * [4 1

c.

. e-s s

-l-l-l--} -l= %

/ A..t.r.3; _SJ9.;. =.

i _

. b_._g

_ ~ ~,._.. s.A _3. "T.ch. ~ v 4

.. s.s a.

__ m,.W -

i1_..t_.

x-m /

s r

_- H _g_

l'.:~p_.g\\.:.,ce

~..,, s _ =. m j

_ n

< r,., M.g _

NEw utuico aa s

. _ - -_ r.. -

y

=

s _-

i

_ c_

_ _e_ a _i_p.

,...._.z

, f..

..,... y

- c,..

_. _c

_ -4

.j 4

y sd p,.:-bc._.

..s., yh;,._7 it._;._;.c w _j_

.T

_3_ _. _ _ _

_i_

n N._

t

_. ~.

v. __n.

...a, =..

_a

_ i-_

=

i v - l _

.w.

(t,c o

~.

f

=

~

~ ~.

L d)r

~~

~~~

~~

f o

- (_1 -

_s _s,afs '

y,#

1 y_

6, j-__ ocsisnAfts couants t

t s

1 i

~

~

~~

DESIGNATES cENsats DIV!stoms 0p t

>< =o

=

9 me.

I 4

q_,.

g n.o_

--_.d ao ao s

.o o

l 0

,.=. p-6

- v i

_. ~ --

u.a I

4 Fig. 5.2.1.

Site location. Source: FES. Fig. 2.1 (modiffed).

_j 3-

_ _ _