ML19350E995
| ML19350E995 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000467, Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/05/1981 |
| From: | Urbanik T TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX |
| To: | Solberg M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 NUDOCS 8106230731 | |
| Download: ML19350E995 (2) | |
Text
hodek Ys D ' YM
~
ED - Yc 7 THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE ceumon smo. me r=2 TMMSPORT OPEMDONS PROGMM (713) 846 5417 May 5, 1981 Mitzie Solberg Emergency Preparedness Development Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mrs. Solberg:
A review was made of the December 23, 1980 evacuation time estimates for Allens Creek relative to NUREG-0654 Rev.1. A marginally deficient poor rating
~ as largely predicted on poor documentation of a number of items in the report.
w Attached is a su:nnary of the evaluation.
No permanent population data is supplied, although it was used to make estimates of evacuation vehicles.
Special facility populations are identified, but no basis is given for the conclusion that no impact is likely on evacuation time.
No documentation is given for roadway segment characteristics.
It also appears that no reduction in capacity was made for adverse weather conditions.
The report also appears deficient in identifying the need for traffic-control at potential bottleneck locations.
No indication was made that the draft report was reviewed by state and local officials responsible for emer-gency planning.
Sincerely, Thomas Urbanik II Assistant Research Engineer TU:jem Enclosure cc Art Desrosier Battelle PNL P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352 810623073/
f TMNSPORTADON RESEARCH ANO DEVELCPMENT
(.
. 'l 6.
- =- :
EVALUATION OF EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATE
- Allens Creek Item Excel.
Adeg.
Poor.
None
- 1.. Introduction A. Maps X
- 8. Assumptions X
1
'C. Methodology x-
.II.
Demand Estimation A. Permanent Residents
'8. Transient Populations
-X C. Special -Facility Population
- 0. EPZ.Sub-areas X
III.
Traffic Capacity A. Evacuation Roadway Network X
B. Roadway Segment Characteristics IV.
Analysis A. Report Format X
B. Methodolcgy X
V.
Other Requirements VI.
Overall
- Note: Rating predicated on the lack of documentation.
Revised S-1-81
_ _..