ML19254E365

Requests NRC Response to Senate Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation Re Evidence of Breakdown in Const Supervision Discovered During Apr Insp.Also Requests Response Under Oath Re NRC Aid in Criminal Investigation of Alleged Coverup

ML19254E365
Person / Time
Site:	Marble Hill
Issue date:	09/04/1979
From:	Dattilo T DATTILO, T.M.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML19254E363	List: ML19254E365
References
NUDOCS 7910310503
Download: ML19254E365 (2)

Text

~

, ~& ' ' % -

• i'.Wi.',Y,$,4:{.[L aQf, s ay., _

,.'R=. - &' k.;,4 *Ss?.',MW.'t'.2%11.'<

--

T.,. #

N eW%

.

THOMAS M. DATTILO .

ATToeNEY AT LAT all EAST MAIM STREET MADi$oH INDIANA 47250

-

pucus 882 + W AW

~ - " "

- -

,

,r September 4, 1979 United States Nuclear Regululatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

,- Attention: Mr. James G. Keppler, Regional Director

Dear Mr. Keppler:

,

• This writer did not receive a copy of the N.R.C. response to the Senate Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation, which supposed-ly states that "an April inspection by N.R.C. personnel provided the first real evidence of a serious breakdown in construction See the Courier-Journal, September supervision (at Marble Hill)."

1, 1979 States News Service article by Charlie Green.

Kindly advise if your office or any of your agents had notice in mid to late 1978 of the following:

, 1. That Newberg Construction Compa. was not following concrete specifications,

'

2. That improper vibrations of concrete were taking place, and,

3. That United States Testing was using some untrained personnel to test concrete .at Marble Hill.

This writer would appreciate a response under oath so~ that there be no confusion or nroblems with the N.R.C. aiding in the criminal investigation of alleged " cover-up" at Marble Hill in connection with the F.B.I. and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Indiana.

Further, according to the above States News Service article, "the N.R.C. added that it sees na reason why P.S.I's organization - - -

cannot be strengthened to function acceptably."

We intervenors have always had problems with the lack of objectivity, in our opinion, shown by the N.R.C. in its relation-ship with the nuclear power industry in general, and with P.S.I.

4 349 SEP 'I1979

. . . . . - . .

7 910310 bb

- ..

. .

s -

--;-f.

.

. .

-

.

.

-

.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

September 4, 1979 Page Two .

.. . $ 'f .

in particular. Obviously, many discussions have occurred, behi) rid closed doors and will continue. i T' 'iM. 'FN5

,e4:$$ * ^?Sih-c t

• 's-This writer respectfully requests that you remove yourself*-;(. ' , . ,

as the main investigative body of construction defect,s 'at Marble.;:,, -

Hill if your office cannot respond negatively under oath to.'_the ,,'l,%-

above question concerning N.R.C. knowledge in 1978. .'f,{,ii.g',-y[:'

-

,',

. . . .,s -

-

Very truly yours, w

.

,

-

& $f.

i Thomas M. Dattilo

,

TMD/jmc

,

cc: U.S Attorney's Office for the Southern Dis.:rict of Indiana

.

.

@ .-

p 8

--

.

'* w.

, . '" .

> -y ~; : * < . .. tg

,.g,~.* *: *~

W,g.g> _

', . - ' , , b

. 1 *_.

. . . . .'.[A' ' ~. ~

-

.. $k 's[-

• . . n. _ k s.

-

'

,"?'

.- 5.[-- -

b'-]b. .C

-

,

..; .. L . . ..

- - -

.

..

• ,,.d'=

'_

-. -- - -.. - -

_ . . _ . . . . ..

-'

_ _ _ _ . .