IR 05000424/2013003
ML13210A312 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Vogtle |
Issue date: | 07/29/2013 |
From: | Ehrhardt F J NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB2 |
To: | Tynan T E Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
References | |
IR-13-003 | |
Download: ML13210A312 (29) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 July 29, 2013 Mr. Tom Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
7821 River Road
Waynesboro, GA 30830
SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2013003 AND 05000425/2013003
Dear Mr. Tynan:
On June 30, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on July 23, 2013, with Mr. J. Thomas and other members of your staff.
The inspection(s) examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
No findings were identified during this inspection.
In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosures, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2
Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.: 05000424, 05000425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and NPF-81
Enclosures: Inspection Report 05000424/2013003 and 05000425/2013003 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/encl: (See page 2)
_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:DRS RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE Via email Via email Via email MES /RA for/ JGW /RA/ FJE /RA/ NAME MSpeck MCain TChandler DBerkshire JWorosilo FEhrhardt DATE 07/25/2013 07/24/2013 07/26/2013 07/25/2013 07/29/2013 07/29/2013 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO cc w/encl: C. Russ Dedrickson Fleet Support Supervisor
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Mr. C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company Electronic Mail Distribution
S. Kuczynski Chairman, President and CEO Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Todd L. Youngblood Vice President Fleet Oversight
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
W. L. Bargeron Plant Manager Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
D. G. Bost Chief Nuclear Officer
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
N. J. Stringfellow Licensing Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Paula Marino Vice President Engineering
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
D. W. Daughhetee Licensing Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
T. A. Lynch Vice President Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Dennis R. Madison Vice President Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Leigh Perry SVP & General Counsel-Ops & SNC
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
T. Site Vice President Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
C. R. Pierce Nuclear Licensing Director
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Bradley J. Adams Vice President Fleet Operations Support
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
T. D. Honeycutt Regulatory Response Supervisor
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Sandra Threatt, Manager Nuclear Response and Emergency Environmental Surveillance
Bureau of Land and Waste Management Department of Health and Environmental
Control Electronic Mail Distribution
(cc w/encl continued next page) (cc w/encl continued)
L. P. Hill Licensing Supervisor
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
L. L. Crumpton Administrative Assistant, Sr.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
B. D. McKinney, Jr. Regulatory Response Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Mark Rauckhorst Site Vice President Vogtle Units 3 and 4
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Electronic Mail Distribution
S. C. Swanson Site Support Manager Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Electronic Mail Distribution
Arthur H. Domby, Esq.
Troutman Sanders Electronic Mail Distribution
Jerry Ranalli Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Power Electronic Mail Distribution
Division of Radiological Health TN Dept. of Environment & Conservation
401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1532
Director Consumers' Utility Counsel Division Governor's Office of Consumer Affairs
2 M. L. King, Jr. Drive Plaza Level East; Suite 356 Atlanta, GA 30334-4600 Office of the County Commissioner Burke County Commission Electronic Mail Distribution Hickox, T. Mark Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Electronic Mail Distribution
Richard Haynes Director, Division of Waste Management S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Lee Foley Manager of Contracts Generation Oglethorpe Power Corporation Electronic Mail Distribution
Mark Williams Commissioner Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution
Chuck Mueller
Manager Policy and Radiation Program Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution
James C. Hardeman Environmental Radiation Program Manager Environmental Protection Division
Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution
Mr. Steven M. Jackson Senior Engineer - Power Supply Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Electronic Mail Distribution
Reece McAlister Executive Secretary Georgia Public Service Commission Electronic Mail Distribution
Office of the Attorney General
40 Capitol Square, SW Atlanta, GA 30334
Amy Whaley
Resident Manager Electronic Mail Distribution Letter to Tom from Frank Ehrhardt dated July 29, 2013 SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2013003 AND 05000425/2013003
Distribution w/encl
- C. Evans, RII L. Douglas, RII OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMVogtle Resource Enclosure U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
Docket Nos.: 50-424, 50-425
Report Nos.: 05000424/2013003 and 05000425/2013003
Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC)
Facility: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2
Location: Waynesboro, GA 30830
Dates: April 01, 2013 through June 30, 2013
Inspectors: M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector T. Chandler, Resident Inspector M. Speck, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector (Sections 1EP2, 1EP3, 1EP5, 4OA1, 4OA6) D. Berkshire, Emergency Preparedness Inspector (Sections 1EP2, 1EP3, 1EP5, 4OA1, 4OA6) Approved by: Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2
Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000424/2013-003, 05000425/2013-003; 04/01/2013 - 06/30/2013; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2; Integrated Inspection Report
The report covered a three-month period of inspection by two resident inspectors, two emergency preparedness inspectors, and one senior project engineer. No findings were identified during this inspect ion period. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process" revision 4.
REPORT DETAILS
Summary of Plant Status
Unit 1 operated at or near full rated thermal power (RTP) for the entire inspection period.
Unit 2 began the inspection period in Mode 3, coming out of refueling outage 2R16. The Unit 2 startup was performed on April 2, and the plant attained full RTP on April 5. The unit was shut down on June 1 to replace degrading shaft seals on reactor coolant pumps 3 & 4. The unit was restarted on June 8, and attained full RTP on June 9. Unit 2 operated at or near full RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity
1R01 Adverse Weather Protection
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Summer Readiness of Offsite and Alternate AC Power System
The inspectors reviewed the material condition of offsite and onsite alternate AC power
systems (including switchyard and transformers) by performing a walk down of the switchyard, reviewing outstanding work orders, and assessing corrective actions for any degraded conditions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
.2 Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions
The inspectors conducted a detailed review of the station's adverse weather procedures written for extreme high temperatures. The inspectors verified that weather related equipment deficiencies identified during the previous year had been corrected prior to the onset of seasonal extremes. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's
implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures before the onset of seasonal extreme weather conditions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors evaluated the following risk-significant systems:
- Unit 2 solid state reactor protection system (SSPS)
- Unit 1 main generator excitation system
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R04 Equipment Alignment
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Partial Walkdown
The inspectors verified that critical portions of selected risk-significant systems were correctly aligned. The inspectors selected systems for assessment because they were a redundant or backup system/train, were important for mitigating risk for the current plant conditions, had been recently realigned, or were a single-train system. The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures and drawings. The inspectors verified that critical portions of the selected systems were correctly aligned by performing partial walkdowns. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors selected the following four systems/trains to inspect:
- Unit 2 train "A" &" B" motor-driven aux iliary feedwater (AFW) systems while the train "C" turbine-driven AFW pump was out of service due to a planned maintenance outage
- Unit 1 train "A" emergency diesel generator (EDG) while the Unit 1 train "B" EDG was out of service due to a planned maintenance outage
- Unit 2 train "A" & "C" AFW systems while the Train "B" motor-driven AFW system was out of service due to a planned maintenance outage
- Unit 1 train "B" spent fuel pool cooling and purification system while the train "A" system was out of service due to a planned maintenance outage
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R05 Fire Protection
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Quarterly Inspection
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of selected fire plans by comparing the fire plans to the defined hazards and defense-in-depth features specified in the fire protection program. In evaluating the fire plans, the inspectors assessed the following items:
- (1) control of transient combustibles and ignition sources,
- (2) fire detection systems, (3)water-based fire suppression systems,
- (4) gaseous fire suppression systems,
- (5) manual firefighting equipment and capability
- (6) passive fire protection features, (7)compensatory measures and fire watches, and
- (8) issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's corrective action program. The inspectors toured the following five fire areas to assess material condition and operational status of fire protection equipment. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Unit 2 EDG fuel oil storage tank building, fire zones 165 and 166
- Unit 1 and 2 rod control switchgear rooms, fire zones 59, 68, 69, and 75
- Unit 1 residual heat removal (RHR) and containment spray (CS) pump rooms, fire zones 4, 5, 9, and 10
- Unit 2 containment building, fire zones 140A, 140B, 140C, and 140E
- Unit 2 safety injection (SI) and auxiliary component cooling water (ACCW) pump rooms, fire zones 26B, 30, 31, 32, and 33
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R06 Flood Protection Measures
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Internal Flooding
The inspectors reviewed related flood analysis documents and walked down the areas listed below that contain risk significan t structures, systems, and components susceptible to flooding. The inspectors verified plant design features and plant procedures for flood mitigation were consistent with design requirements and internal flooding analysis assumptions. The inspectors also assessed the condition of flood protection barriers and drain systems. In addition, the inspectors verified the licensee was identifying and properly addressing issues using their corrective action program. Document reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification:
The inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario administered to an operating crew conducted in accordance with the licensee's accredited requalification training program.
The inspectors assessed licensed operator performance, the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators, the quality of any post-scenario critique, any follow-up actions taken by the facility licensee, and the performance of the simulator. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review (Licensed Operator Performance)
- The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on April 2, during the reactor startup following the 2R16 refueling outage. Inspectors observed licensed operator performance to assess the following:
- Use of plant procedures
- Control board manipulations
- Communications between crew members
- Use and interpretation of instruments, indications, and alarms
- Use of human error prevention techniques
- Documentation of activities
- Management and supervision Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors assessed the licensee's treatment of the two issues listed below in order to verify the licensee appropriately addressed equipment problems within the scope of the Maintenance Rule (MR) (10 CFR 50.65). The inspectors reviewed procedures and records in order to evaluate the licensee's identification, assessment, and characterization of the problems as well as their corrective actions for returning the equipment to a satisfactory condition. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
The inspectors also interviewed system engineers and the maintenance rule coordinator to assess the accuracy of performance deficiencies and extent of condition.
- CR 351658, Unplanned LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
- CR 530916, Unit 1 SG loops 2 and 3 do not indicate steam flow
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the maintenance activities listed below to verify the licensee assessed and managed plant risk as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and licensee procedures. The inspectors assessed the adequacy of the licensee's risk assessments and implementation of risk management actions. The inspectors also verified that the licensee was identifying and resolving problems with assessing and managing maintenance-related risk using the corrective action program. Additionally, for maintenance resulting from unforeseen situations, the inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the licensee's planning and control of emergent work activities.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Week of April 22: maintenance outage on the "1B" EDG concurrent with maintenance activities on the supply breakers for the "B" train NSCW cooling tower fans
- Week of April 29: unplanned inoperability of the "2B" EDG after it failed its monthly surveillance test
- Week of May 27: maintenance outage on the "2B" motor-driven AFW system concurrent with high-risk work being performed in the high-voltage switchyard.
- Week of June 3: Unit 2 maintenance outage to replace the seals on reactor coolant pumps 3&4
- Week of June 10: unplanned inoperability of the "1B" SI pump due to troubleshooting accumulator leakage
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R15 Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors selected the six operability determinations or functionality evaluations listed below for review based on the risk-significance of the associated components and systems. The inspectors reviewed the technical adequacy of the determinations to ensure that technical specification operability was properly justified and the components or systems remained capable of performing their design functions. To verify whether components or systems were operable, the inspectors compared the operability and design criteria in the appropriate sections of the technical specification and updated final safety analysis report to the licensee's evaluations. Where compensatory measures were required to maintain operability, the inspectors determined whether the measures in place would function as intended and were properly controlled. Additionally, the
inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with operability evaluations. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- CR 627516, Void identified during the performance of 50085-C and 14460-2 at 21208X4052
- CR 632670, 14802B-2 NSCW Pump #2 Response Time Test Failure
- CR 615437, Unit 2 reactor coolant pump number 3 seal injection flow pegged high
- CR 618139, Unit 2, 2BD1 125 VDC ground
- CR 648248, Calculational error impacts EAL set point values for RS1 and RG1
- CR 654111, Line upstream of AFW check valve 2-1302-U4-113 is hot to the touch
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R18 Plant Modifications
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors verified that the plant modifications listed below did not affect the safety functions of important safety systems. The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases and performance capability of risk significant structures, systems and components. The inspectors also verified modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not place the plant in an unsafe condition. Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities, and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Temporary modification SNC493725 - installation of roller supports to the Unit 2, loop 3 main feedwater regulating valve positioned feedback bracket to mitigate vibration
- Temporary modification SNC376986 - insta llation of accelerometers on the RHR bypass lines in order to gather vibration data to aid in the determination of stress conditions on the RCS piping
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R19 Post Maintenance Testing
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors either observed post-maintenance testing or reviewed the test results for the seven maintenance activities listed below to verify the work performed was completed correctly and the test activities were adequate to verify system operability and functional capability. The inspectors evaluated these activities for the following: acceptance criteria were clear and demonstrated operational readiness; effects of testing on the plant were adequately addressed; test instrumentation was appropriate; tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures; equipment was returned to its operational status following testing; and test documentation was properly evaluated. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with post-maintenance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the
.
- MWOs SNC376951 - repair fuel oil pump reducer leak, repair/torque bolt at intercooler, prime fuel oil header, SNC350823 - replace load sensor, and SNC124891 - replace K10, VR1, & VR2 relays
- MWOs SNC134996 - 2B ESF chilled water - complete motor PM, change oil, and SNC137702 - 2B ESF chilled water - calibrate/replace 162 Agastat relay
- MWOs SNC459186 - change inboard bearing oil, and SNC493526 - swap pump breaker
- MWOs SNC 128306 - 1A control building (CB) ESF chiller transmitter replacement and SNC 125851, 1A CB ESF chiller channel calibration T-4170
- MWO SNC493676 - 2FV-5154 failed stroke time
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R20 Refueling and Other Outage Activities
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors performed the inspection activities described below for the Unit 2 refueling outage (2R16) that ended on April 7, 2013. The inspectors verified that the licensee: 1) considered risk in developing the outage schedule 2) controlled plant configuration in accordance with administrative risk reduction methodologies, 3)developed work schedules to manage fatigue, 4) developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions, and 5) adhered to operating license and technical specification requirements. Additionally, inspectors verified that safety-related and risk significant structures, systems, and components not accessible during power operations were maintained in an operable condition.
- Observed heat up and startup activities to verify that TS, license conditions, and other requirements, commitments, and administrative procedure prerequisites for mode changes were met prior to changing modes or plant conditions. Reactor coolant system (RCS) integrity was verified by reviewing RCS leakage calculations and containment integrity was verified by reviewing the status of containment penetrations and containment isolation valves
Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with outage activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R22 Surveillance Testing
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the seven surveillance tests listed below and either observed the test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment operability and met Technical Specification and licensee procedural requirements. The inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Routine Surveillance Tests
- 24751-1 Rev. 23, Steam Generator Level (Narrow Range) Protection Channel I 1L-529 Channel Operational Test and Channel Calibration
- 14980B-1 Rev. 24.1, Diesel Generator "1B" Operability Test
- 14609-2 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K 601 Train "B" Test Safety Injection
- 24802-1 Rev. 18, Steam Pressure Loop 1 (Protection IV) 1P-516 Channel Operational Test and Channel Calibration In-Service Tests (IST)
- 14825-2 Rev. 93, Quarterly Inservice Valve Test, 2HV-9001A Reactor Coolant System Leak Detection
- 14905-1 Rev. 67.6, RCS Leakage Calculation (Inventory Balance)
- 14905-2 Rev. 51.6, RCS Leakage Calculation (Inventory Balance)
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP2 Alert and Notification System Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the licensee's methods for testing and maintaining the alert and notification system in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114, Attachment 02, Alert and Notification System Evaluation. The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR Part 50.47(b)(5) and its related 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.D requirements were used as reference criteria. The criteria contained in NUREG-0654, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1, were also used as a reference.
The inspectors interviewed personnel responsible for system performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the alert and notification system on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP3 Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's Emergency Response Organization (ERO) augmentation staffing requirements and process for notifying the ERO to ensure the readiness of key staff for responding to an event and timely facility activation. The qualification records of key position ERO personnel were reviewed to ensure all ERO qualifications were current. A sample of problems identified from augmentation drills or system tests performed since the last inspection was reviewed to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions.
The inspection was conducted in accordanc e with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114, Attachment 03, Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System.
The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2), and its related 10 CFR 50, Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.
Document reviewed are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the ERO staffing and augmentation system on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP5 Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the corrective actions identified through the Emergency Preparedness program to determine the significance of the issues, the completeness and effectiveness of corrective actions, and to determine if issues were recurring. The licensee's post-event after action reports, self-assessments, and audits were reviewed to assess the licensee's ability to be self-critical, thus avoiding complacency and degradation of their emergency preparedness program. Inspectors reviewed the licensee's 10 CFR 50.54(q) change process, personnel training, and selected evaluations of Emergency Preparedness document revisions to assess adequacy. The inspectors toured facilities and reviewed equipment and facility maintenance records to assess licensee's adequacy in maintaining them. The inspectors observed licensee staff demonstrate the capabilities of selected radiation monitoring instrumentation to adequately support Emergency Action Level (EAL) declarations.
The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114.05, Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness. The applicable planning standards, related 10 CFR 50, Appendix E requirements, and 10 CFR 50.54(q) and
- (t) were used as reference criteria.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the maintenance of emergency preparedness on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
Introduction:
The inspectors identified an unresolved item (URI) concerning the capabilities of the main steam line radiation monitors to provide threshold values used to declare a General Emergency under RG1 "Abnormal Rad Levels/Radiological Effluent,"
as described in the licens ee's NRC-approved EAL scheme.
Description:
The inspectors reviewed licensee corrective action item CR 564168. In December, 2012, the licensee determined that main steam line radiation monitor (RE-13119 through 13122) may not be able to provide indications of 3.1E+5 uCi/cc which is the threshold value specified for declaring a general emergency. It is not a current safety concern as alternate means of declaring a general emergency exists and additional compensatory measures were put in place however the licensee had not
completed their evaluation of the instruments' capabilities. Inspectors concluded that a review of the licensee's completed evaluation is necessary to determine if the issue constitutes a violation of regulatory requirements. Having accurate EAL threshold values are part of the Risk-Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) under 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). This issue is identified as URI 05000424 and 05000425/2013003-01, "Ability of Main Steam Line Radiation Monitors to Provide Threshold Values for EAL RG1."
1EP6 Drill Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors observed the emergency preparedness drill conducted on May 15, 2013. The inspectors observed licensee activities in the simulator and/or technical support center to evaluate implementation of the emergency plan, including event classification, notification, and protective action recommendations. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's performance against inspection criteria established in the licensee's procedures. Additionally, the inspectors attended the post-exercise critique to assess the licensee's effectiveness in identifying emergency preparedness weaknesses and verified the identified weaknesses were entered in the corrective action program.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Barrier Integrity Cornerstone
The inspectors reviewed a sample of the perfo rmance indicator (PI) data, submitted by the licensee, for the PIs listed below.
To verify the accuracy and completeness of the data reported for the station, the inspectors reviewed plant records compiled between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013, for both Unit 1 and Unit 2. The inspections verified that the PI data complied with guidance contained in NEI 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Indicator Guideline," and licensee procedures. The inspectors also confirmed the PIs were calculated correctly. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with PI data. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity
- Reactor Coolant System Leakage
.2 Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the PIs listed below for the period January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
- Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
- Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation (ERO)
- Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS)
For the specified review period, the inspector examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill and exercise performance through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for alert and notification system reliability through review of a sample of the licensee's records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution
.1 Routine Review
The inspectors performed a daily screening of items entered into the licensee's corrective action program in order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up. The inspectors reviewed daily condition reports, attended screening meetings, or accessed the licensee's computerized corrective action database.
.2 Semi-Annual Trend Review
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program and associated documents to identify trends which could indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. The inspectors focused their review on repetitive equipment issues, but also considered the results of inspector daily condition report screenings, licensee trending efforts, and licensee human performance results. The review nominally considered the six month period of October 2012 to March 2013 although some examples extended beyond those dates when the scope of the trend warranted. The inspectors compared their results with the results contained in the licensee's trend documents. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed the adequacy of corrective actions associated with a sample of the issues identified in the licensee's trend reports. The inspectors also reviewed corrective action documents which were processed by the licensee to identify potential adverse trends in structures, systems, and/or components as evidenced by acceptance of long-standing non-conforming or degraded conditions.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Operator Work-Around Annual Review
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors performed a detailed review of the licensee's operator work-around, operator burden, and control room deficiency lists for the station in effect on May 31, 2013 to verify that the licensee identified operator workarounds at an appropriate threshold and entered them in the corrective action program. The inspectors verified that the licensee identified the full extent of issues, performed appropriate evaluations, and planned appropriate corrective actions. The inspectors also reviewed compensatory actions and their cumulative effects on plant operation. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA3 Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Unit 1 Notice of Unusual Event (NOUE) April 4, 2013 (Event Notification 48880)
On April 4, 2013, at 0632 the Unit 1 control room received a fire alarm from the Unit 1 control building. A non-licensed operator was dispatched to investigate. Approximately six minutes later the system operator report ed to the Unit 1 control room that a small flame was visible inside computer inverter 1ND3I1 located in control building room A33. The control room dispatched the Vogtle fire brigade in accordance with fire response procedures. At 0647 a NOUE was declared due to a fire in the control building for greater than 15 minutes. At 0651 the Vogtle fire brigade captain reported that the fire had been extinguished. At 0745 the Vogtle emergency director terminated the NOUE.
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's classification and notifications to the NRC and state/county governments. The inspectors verified the licensee classified the event in accordance with site emergency action level procedures. The inspectors also verified the event was reported as required by 10 CFR Part 50.72.
.2 Unit 2 Forced Outage June 1, 2013
On June 1, 2013, at 0441, Unit 2 conducted a normal shutdown and cool down to replace the shaft seals for RCPs 3&4. RCPs 3&4 were shutdown soon after the reactor was tripped, which forced the operators to depressurize the plant using auxiliary pressurizer sprays and by cycling backup heaters. The inspectors observed the Unit shutdown and cooldown. The inspectors verified that the licensee: 1) considered risk in developing the outage schedule 2) controlled plant configuration in accordance with administrative risk reduction methodologies, 3) developed work schedules to manage fatigue, 4) developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions, and 5)adhered to operating license and technical specification requirements. Additionally, inspectors verified that safety-related and risk significant structures, systems, and components not accessible during power operations were maintained in an operable condition. The inspectors also observed the unit heat up and reactor startup conducted on June 8.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA5 Other Activities
a. Inspection Scope
Quarterly Resident Inspector Observations of Security Personnel and Activities During the inspection period, the inspectors conducted observations of security force personnel and activities to ensure that the activities were consistent with licensee security procedures and regulatory requirements relating to nuclear plant security.
These observations took place during both normal and off-normal plant working hours.
b. Findings and Observations
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
a. Exit Meeting On July 23, the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. J. Thomas and other members of plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee personnel
- R. Brown, Training Manager
- R. Collins, Chemistry Manager
- G. Saxon, Plant Manager
- K. Dyar, Security Manager
- G. Gunn, Licensing
- M. Johnson, Health Physics Manager
- J. Thomas, Operations Director
- J. Robinson, Engineering Programs Manager
- S. Swanson, Site Support Manager
- T. Tynan, Site Vice-President
- T. Thompson, Systems Engineering Manager
- F. Pournia, Engineering Director
NRC personnel
- M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector
- T. Chandler, Resident Inspector
- F. Ehrhardt, Chief, Region II Reactor Projects Branch 2
LIST OF ITEMS
OPENED AND CLOSED
OPEN AND CLOSED
None
OPENED
005000424, 425/2013003-01 URI Ability of Main Steam Line Radiation
Monitors to Provide Threshold Values for EAL RG1 (Section 1EP5)
CLOSED
None
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection
Procedures
- 230-1, Rev. 22.1, Offsite AC Circuit Verification and Capacity/Capability Evaluation
- 230-2, Rev. 21.1, Offsite AC Circuit Verification and Capacity/Capability Evaluation
- 18017-C, Rev. 9.5, Abnormal Grid Disturbances/Loss of Grid
- 13830-1, Rev. 67.0, Main Generator Operation
- 13830-2, Rev. 53.0, Main Generator Operation 11889-C Rev. 20, Severe Weather Checklist
- VNP-EHS-4-7 Rev. 0, Severe Weather (Units 3&4)
- NMP-GM-025 Rev. 2.0, Seasonal Readiness Process
- Other
- Seasonal Readiness Crash Cart Checklists
Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment
Procedures
- 11610-2 Rev. 21.3, Auxiliary Feedwater System Alignment
- 11145-1 Rev. 15.1, Diesel Generator Alignment
- 11146-1 Rev. 7.1, Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer System Alignment
- 11719-1, Rev. 16.2, Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Purification System Alignment
Drawings
- 2X4DB161-1, P&I Diagram Rev. 35.0, Auxiliary Feedwater System Condensate Storage & Degasifier System, System No. 1302 2X4DB161-2, P&I Diagram Rev. 24.0, Auxiliary Feedwater System, System No. 1302 2X4DB161-3, P&I Diagram Rev. 38.0, Auxiliary Feedwater Pump System, (Aux Feedwater Pump Turbine Driver) System No. 1302
- 2X4DB168-3, P&I Diagram Rev. 37.0, Condensate and Feedwater System, System No. 1305 1X4DB170-1 Rev. 46.0, P&I Diagram Diesel Generator System Train A - System No. 2403 1X4DB170-2 Rev. 46.0, P&I Diagram Diesel Generator System Train B - System No. 2403 2X4DB161-1, P&I Diagram Rev. 36.0, Auxiliary Feedwater System Condensate Storage &
- Degasifier System, System No. 1302
- 1X4DB130, Rev. 49.0, P&I Diagram Spent Fuel Cooling and Purification System, System No.
- 213
Section 1R05: Fire Protection Annual/Quarterly
Procedures
- 2865-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 165 - Diesel Generator Tanks and Pumphouse Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2866-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 166 - Diesel Generator Tanks and Pumphouse Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2759-1 Rev. 1.2, Zone 59 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2759-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 59 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2768-1 Rev. 1.2, Zone 68 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2768-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 68 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2769-1 Rev. 1.2, Zone 69 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan 92769-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 69 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan 92775-1 Rev. 4.1, Zone 75 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan Attachment 92775-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 75 - Control Building - Level B Fire Fighting Preplan 92704-1, Rev. 2.2, Zone 4 - Auxiliary Building Wing Area Fire Fighting Preplan 92705-1, Rev. 4.2, Zone 5 - Auxiliary Building - Level D Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2709-1, Rev. 3.2, Zone 9 - Auxiliary Building - Level D Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2710-1, Rev. 4.2, Zone 10 - Auxiliary Building - Level D Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2840A-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 140A - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1, 2, and 3 Fire Fighting
- Preplan 92840B-2 Rev. 4.0, Zone 140B - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1, 2, and 3 Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2840C-2 Rev. 2.0, Zone 140C - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1, 2, and 3 Fire Fighting
- Preplan
- 2840E-2 Rev. 1.0, Zone 140E - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1, 2, and 3 Fire Fighting Preplan 92726B-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 26B - Auxiliary Building - Levels A&B, Fire Fighting Preplan
- 2730-2 Rev.1.0, Zone 30 - Auxiliary Building - Level B, ACCW Pump, Train A Fire Fighting
- Preplan
- 2731-2 Rev.1.0, Zone 31 - Auxiliary Building - Level B, Fire Fighting Preplan 92732-2 Rev.1.0, Zone 32 - Auxiliary Building - Level B, SI Pump, Train A Fire Fighting Preplan 92733-2 Rev.1.0, Zone 33 - Auxiliary Building - Level B, Fire Fighting Preplan
Section 1R06: Flood Protection Measures
- Design Basis and Calculations
- X6CXC-28 Rev.11, Flooding Analysis Auxiliary Building Level A X6CXC-30 Rev.9, Flooding Analysis Auxiliary Building Level B
Drawings
- 1X4DB146-1 Rev. 22.0, P&I Diagram Auxiliary Bldg. & Misc Drains Sys No. 1215
- 1X4DB147-2 Rev. 9.0, P&I Diagram Auxiliary Bldg. Flood Retaining Rooms Alarms & Drains System No. 1218
Section 1R11:
- Licensed Operator Requa lification Program and Licensed Operator Performance Other V-RQ-SE-13303 Rev. 1.0, Simulator Exercise Guide: Failed PZR Code Safety
Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness
- Condition Reports/Technical Evaluations
- CR 351658, Unplanned LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
- CR 637701, Unit 2 system 1602 (nuclear instrumentation) taken to A(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP
- CR 352493, 2N-32 not responding as expected
- CR 461828, MR unavailability time exceeded for system 1602
- PMs Attachment
- TE 638797, Unit 2 system 1602 taken to A(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP
- CR 530916, Unit 1 SG loops 2 and 3 do not indicate steam flow
- CR 530931, Activation of an issue response team to address no flow from SGs 2&3 during
- 1R17 restart
- CR 637137, Unit 1 system 1301 (main steam) taken to A(1) status during 04/30/13 MREP
- Other Records
- CAR 196113, Unit 1 SG loops 2 and 3 do not indicate steam flow
Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments
Condition Reports
- 2670, 14802B-2 NSCW Pump #2 Response Time Test Failure
- 632663, U2 NSCW Pump #2 requires Response Time Test
- 615437, Unit 2 reactor coolant pump number 3 seal injection flow pegged high
- 617564, LCO 3.5.5 and SR 3.5.5.1 conflict
- 618139, Request IDO for DC ground on 2BD1
- 614876, Unexpected annunciator, ALB34B01, 125 VDC SWGR 2BD1 Trouble
- 648248, Calculational error impacts EAL set point values for RS1 and RG1
- 654111, Line upstream of AFW check valve
- 2-1302-U4-113 is hot to the touch
- Technical Evaluations
- 633090, IDO for U2 NSCW Pump #2
- TE 654089, IDO for
- CR 654111
- Other Vogtle Generating Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications Volume 1 Specifications Vogtle Generating Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications Volume 2 Bases
- DOEJ-VXSNC648248-M001, Corrected Emergency Action Level Set Points for RS1 and RG1
for Plant Vogtle
- VEGP-13-022-01, 10
- CFR 50.54(q) screening/evaluation of new EAL RG1 Threshold Value 1
and RS1 Threshold Value 1 performed per
- DOEJ-VXSNC648248-M001
- Standing Order
- C-2012-20 version 4.0, Compensatory measures for radiation monitor EAL
thresholds not being bounded by the FSAR, approved 6/1/13
Section 1R18: Plant Modifications
Work Orders
- SNC493725 - installation of roller supports to the Unit 2, loop 3 main feedwater regulating valve positioned feedback bracket to mitigate vibration. Package approved on 6/4/13 SNC376986 - installation of accelerometers on the RHR bypass lines in order to gather vibration data to aid in the determination of stress conditions on the RCS piping
Procedures
- NMP-ES-054-001 Rev. 1.2, Temporary Modification Processing
- Other Records
- DOEJ-VXSNC493725 - support to temporary modification SNC SNC493725
- DOEJ-VD1061091101-S001 - Vogtle RHR Bypass Pipe Monitoring (Loop 1)
- Attachment
Section 1R19: Post-Maintenance Testing
Procedures
- 14810-2 Rev. 41.2, TDAFW Pump Operability, Response Time, and Check Valve IST
- 14980B-1 Rev. 24.1, Diesel Generator 1B Operability Test
- 13744B-2 Rev. 11.1, Train B Essential Chilled Water System
- 14807B-2 Rev. 1.5, Train B Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump IST and Response Time
- Test 14545B-2 Rev. 1.1, Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump B Operability Test 23830-C Rev. 21.1, Process Loop Channel Calibration
- 2402-C Rev. 28, Rosemount Transmitter Removal and Reinstallation
- 23805-C Rev. 5.1, Action Instruments Model AP1400 and AP1401 Limit Alarm Module Calibration
- 14825-2 Rev. 93, Quarterly Inservice Valve Test
Work Orders
- SNC376951 - Repair Fuel Oil Pump Reducer Leak, Repair/Torque Bolt at Intercooler, Prime Fuel Oil Header
- SNC350823 - Replace Load Sensor
- SNC124891 - Replace K10, VR1, & VR2 Relays
- SNC137702 - 2B ESF Chilled Water - Calibrate/Replace 162 Agastat Relay
- SNC459186 - change inboard bearing oil SNC493526 - swap pump breaker SNC128306 - 1A Control Building (CB) ESF Chiller transmitter replacement
- SNC125851- 1A CB ESF Chiller channel calibration T-4170
- SNC620857, troubleshooting results for 2HV-9001A
- SNC493676 - 2FV-5154 failed stroke time Other Records Unit 2 operator logs for 4/17/13
- Unit 1 B train EDG outage fragnet Unit 1 operator logs for 4/25/13
- Unit 2 operator logs for 5/1/13 SCL01784, channel calibration T-4170 SCL01087, channel calibration 1T-22450A
Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing
Procedures
- 24751-1 Rev. 23, Steam Generator Level (Narrow Range) Protection Channel I 1L-529 Channel Operational Test and Channel Calibration
- 14905-1 Rev. 67.6, RCS Leakage Calculation (Inventory Balance)
- 14905-2 Rev. 51.6, RCS Leakage Calculation (Inventory Balance)
- 14980B-1 Rev. 24.1, Diesel Generator 1B Operability Test
- 14609-2 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K
- 601 Train B Test Safety Injection
- 14825-2 Rev. 93, Quarterly Inservice Valve Test 24802-1 Rev. 18, Steam Pressure Loop 1 (Protection IV) 1P-516 Channel Operational Test and Channel Calibration Attachment
Work Orders
- SNC418226, Steam Pressure Loop1, Protection CH #4
Section 1EP2: Alert and Notification System Evaluation
Procedures
and Reports
- 91706-C, Alert Notification System, Rev. 15
- 25722-C, Emergency Alert Siren Performance Test, Rev. 16.1 2012 and 2013 Vogtle Emergency Information Calendar Plant Vogtle Emergency Information for Visitors to the Area brochure
- Records and Data
- 2012 Annual Tone Alert Radio/Siren Survey Report Records of daily, weekly, quarterly and annual maintenance and testing 2011 - 2012
- Documentation of ANS repair and annual preventative maintenance 2011 - 2012
- Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2 Emergency Plan, Rev. 59
- Corrective Action documents
- Inadequate
Section 1EP3: Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System
Procedures
- Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2 Emergency Plan, Rev. 59 00012-C, Shift Manning Requirements, Ver 17.1
- 91101-C, Emergency Response Organization, Ver 27
- 201-C, Activation and Operation of the Technical Support Center, Ver 18
- 202-C, Activation and Operation of the Operations Support Center, Ver 23 91601-C, Emergency Preparedness Training, Ver. 23
- NMP-EP-101, Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) Activation, Ver. 3.0
- NMP-EP-303, Drill and Exercise Standards, Ver. 11.1
- ND-AD-VNP-013-F01, Nuclear Development Duty Officer Actions for a Vogtle 1 & 2 Declared Emergency, Ver. 6.0
- ND-AD-VNP-013, Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Emergency Preparedness Plan-Site Assembly and Dismissal, Ver. 9.0
- Records and Data Emergency Response Organization List Training and Qualification Records for Selected ERO Members Completed Documentation of Shift Manning Requirements for March 2013 Results of Emergency After-hours Recall System Testing: June and September, 2012
- ERO Augmentation Condition Report/Action Item listing for 2011 - 2012
- Critique report of December 10, 2012 Unannounced After-Hours Facility Activation Drill
- Corrective Action documents
- CAR 196696, System Recall Issues Encountered during 12/10/2012 Callout Drill
- Attachment
Section 1EP5: Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness
Procedures
- Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Emergency Plan, Ver. 59
- NMP-AD-008, Applicability Determinations, Ver. 15.2
- NMP-EP-111, Emergency Notifications, Ver. 7.4
- NMP-EP-301, Maintaining the Emergency Plan, Ver. 2.0
- NMP-GM-003, Self-Assessment Procedure, Ver. 19.0
- NMP-GM-003-001, Self-Assessment Instructions for Focused Area Self-Assessment, Ver. 3.0
- NMP-GM-003-002, Self-Assessment Instructions for
- CHECK-IN Self-Assessment, Ver. 2.0
- 91304-C, Estimating Offsite Dose, Ver. 27.1
- Records and Data
- NOEP-0197, Critique of November 16, 2012 NOUE
- Self-Assessment, Emergency Notification Forms, dated August 13, 2012
- Self-Assessment, State and County EOC Support Equipment Availability, Feb. 3, 2012
- Nuclear Oversight Audits, Fleet-EP-2012 and 2013
- Self-assessment - Biennial NRC Exercise Preparation, dated January 4, 2012 Self-assessment - Biennial NRC Baseline Inspection Preparation, dated January 30, 2013
- Emergency Preparedness drill critique reports for 2011 and 2012
- CFR 50.54(q) Screening/Evaluation for Particulate, Iodine and Gas Digital Radiation Monitor Replacement, Group #1 dated 3/18/2103
- Corrective Action documents
- CR 549499, NOUE of November 16, 2012
- CR 549516, Fire response table needs revision
- CR 498320, DEP Classification failures
- CR 321116, Evaluate aggregate impact of multiple rad monitors out of service
- CR 616502, 2013 Emergency Information calendar comments
- CR 617686, NOS audit findings discussion in quarterly meeting with offsite organizations
Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification
Procedures
- 00163-C, NRC Performance Indicator and Monthly Operating Report preparation and Submittal, Rev. 14.3 25722-C, Emergency Alert Siren Performance Test, Revision 16.1
- Records and Data Documentation of Performance Indicator data from January 1, 2012 through December 31,
- Corrective Action documents
- CR 543005, Evaluate notification for accuracy under DEP
- Attachment
Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems
- Procedures/Calculations/Engineering Documents
- 10025-C Rev. 3.0, Work Around Program
- 10030-C, Rev. 1, Aggregate Operator Impact Review Guideline
- Other Records
- AI 2007205091, Operations Superintendent OWA Review Logs Operations Monitoring for Work-Arounds, Burdens and Distractions Vogtle Quarterly Integrated Performance Assessment April 11, 2013 and May 5, 2013
- 4OA3:
- Event Follow-up
Procedures
- NMP-EP-110-GL03, VEGP EAL - ICs, Threshold Values and Basis, Ver. 3.0 18032-1, Loss of 120V AC Instrument Power, Ver. 31.0
- Other Records Event Notification 48880