ML18089A473

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:29, 12 December 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of Facility Evacuation Time Estimates Based on Review Against NUREG-0654,Rev 1.No Deficiencies Noted
ML18089A473
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000
Issue date: 12/20/1983
From: URBANIK T
TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX
To: PERROTTI D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
RTR-NUREG-0624, RTR-NUREG-624 NUDOCS 8312290374
Download: ML18089A473 (2)


Text

THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION TEXAS 77843-3135 TRANSPORT OPERATIONS PROGRAM Mr. Don Perrotti U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Perrotti:

December 20, 1983 (409) 845-1535 The February 27, 1981 Evacuation Time Estimates prepared by Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas Inc., for Public Service Electric & Gas Company 1 s Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Stations has been reviewed against NUREG-0654, Rev. 1. As indicated on the attached summary, no deficiencies have been noted. The revised study referenced above corrects the deficiency noted in my previous letter to Paul Psomas dated September 8, 1980. If you have any questions, you can reach me at (409) 845-1535.

TU:jh attachment cc: Ev a Hickey Batte 11 e PNL P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352 Sincerely yours, V-----IJJ--e_

Thomas Urbanik II Program Manager TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

-* EVALUATION OF EVACUATION TI.STIMATE Salem ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item Adequate Deficient Poor None ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. General A. Maps B. Report Format II. Demand Estimation x x A. Permanent Residents X B. Transient Populations X c. Special Facility Population X D. EPZ Sub-areas X III. Traffic Capacity A. Evacuation Roadway Network B. Roadway Characteristics

c. Adverse Weather Considered IV. Analysis A. Assumptions B. Methodology
c. carless v. Other Requirements A. Confirmation Time B. State and Local Review VI. Overall Date of Report: February 27, 1981 x x x x x x x x x