ML20205M627

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:06, 12 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-348/85-44 & 50-364/85-44.Corrective Actions:Instrument & Control Foreman Reinstructed to Follow Requirements of Section 9 to FNP-0-AP-51 Re Review of Surveillance Tests
ML20205M627
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/01/1986
From: Mcdonald R
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To: Verrelli D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NT-86-0138, NT-86-138, NUDOCS 8604150331
Download: ML20205M627 (2)


Text

-

DM NT-86 0138 Milling Addr;ss 7 #

Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham. Alabama 35291 Ts ? phone 205 783-6090 R. P. Mcdonald Senior Vice President Fhntridge Building

, y [,] [ pl*}

M[y)[g))[] %gg April 1, 1986 Docket No. 50-348 Docket No. 50-364 Mr. D. M. Verrelli U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

SUBJECT:

J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant NRC Inspection of December 19, 1985 - February 10, 1986 RE: Report Number 50-348/85-44 Report thtmber 50-364/85-44

Dear Mr. Verrelli:

This letter inspection refers reports whichtostate:

the violation cited in the subject "The following violation was identified during an inspection conducted on December 19, 1985 through February 10, 1986. The Severity Levels were assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).

Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures be implemented. Administrative Procedure FNP-0-AP-51, " Instrumentation and Control Group Conduct of Operations," Section 9, requires the Instrument and Control Foreman to review all I&C surveillance tests performed on his shift for completeness hnd accuracy and so indicate by signing and dating the procedure.

Contrary to the above, Administrative Procedure 51 was not followed in that a review was not conducted until December 12, 1985, at 5:50 p.m. on STP-228.7A, " Nuclear Instrument System Power Range Channel N-43 Calibration and Functional Test," which was completed on December 10, 1985, at 9:30 p.m.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1)."

hO DO I O

\

wI

Page 2 Admission or Denial The above violation occurred as described in the subject report.

Reason for Violation The above violation was caused by personnel error in that surveillance test procedure FNP-STP-228.7A for power range channel N-43 was completed on December 10, 1985 at 9:30 p.m., but was not reviewed at by an Instrument and Control Foreman until December 12, 1985 5:50 p.m.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved None required.

Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Further Violations followThe the Instrument and requirements of Control Foremen FNP-0-AP-51, have9.been reinstructed to section Date of Full Compliance March 19, 1986 f Aftirmation 1

i I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

this letter is not considered to be of a The information contained in proprietary nature.

Yours very ly, p/

R. P. Mcdonald RPM /KWM:emb l

l 1

l