ML20043G474
| ML20043G474 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1990 |
| From: | Hairston W ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9006200344 | |
| Download: ML20043G474 (2) | |
Text
, -.. <<
' Alabama Power Company 40 inverness Center Parkway Post Ottice Box 1295 Birmmgham. Alabama 35201 Telephone 205 068 5561 W. Q. Hairston, til Senior Vice President June 11, 1990 Nuclear Operations Alabama Power Ibe southern tM:Inc 5ystem Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Vashington, D. C. 20555 Gentlement Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 Additional Information Pertaining to Vorker Respiratory Protection Apparatus y
Exemption Revision Request On February 19, 1990 Alabama Power Company requested a revision to its October 1984 exemption to allow GMR-I canister storage in a Class C environment.. At the request of the NRR staff, the following additional information is provided to justify use of a Class C storage environment.
The use of Class A storage is unnecessarily restrictive and results in lost work time to retrieve canisters since sufficient storage capacity is not available within the radiological controlled work areas. The use of Clars C storage vill allow sufficient canisters to be stored where they can easily be obtained for use. The Class A storage area requirement necessitates frequent and time-consuming restocking during periods of heavy GMR-I canister use.
In addition, Class C storage vould preclude the unnecessary discarding of canisters subjected to temperature and humidity conditions solely to meet a storage requirement not imposed or utilized by the manufacturer.
With' regard to potential radiological impacts to the general public, the proposed exemption revision involves features located entirely within the restricted area as defined in 10CFR Part 20.
It does not affect the potential for or consequences of radiological accidents and does not affect radiological plant effluence. With regard to potential nonradiological s
impacts, the proposed exemption revision does not affect nonradiological plant effluence and has no other environmental impact.
6 9006200344 900611
,ph, PDR ADOCK 05000340 P
PNV
\\E
\\Q L_
.a U. S. Nuclear Regulatcry Commission
. ~,, U rk;r R piratcry Prctcetiin Apparatus Page 2 If you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, g/ $~ U V. G. Hairston, III VGH,III/JARiegd 18.1.08 cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. Hofiman Mr. G. F. Maxwell
' a l
I l
6 1
4
-