ML20012A130

Responds to Generic Ltr 90-01 Re Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey.Completed Questionnaire Encl

ML20012A130
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	03/01/1990
From:	Hairston W ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-90-01, GL-90-1, NUDOCS 9003080350
Download: ML20012A130 (12)

Text

m s - ,

N -I p 4

=

- Alabama Power Company .

i ,2e ' N #) Inverness C;nter Parkway-Post Office Box 1295 -

-j

+ . Birmingham, Alabama 35201 W .

. Telephone 205 866 6581

.i W. O. Hairston,111

Senior Vice President -

- Nuclear Operations Mab8 Illa NWCT  ;

March 1, 1990 the southem elecuc system i Docket.Nos. 50-348 1

50-364 s;

~U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

~ ATTN: Document Control Desk  ;

Washington, D. C. 20555- .

i k ,

Gentlemen:

4 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 .!

Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey' (Generic Letter 90-01)  !

Per Generic Letter (G.L.) 90-01-dated January 18, 1990, the NRC requested'  ;

input;from utilities regarding the amount of time spent by key managers in response to various inspections and audits that are imposed upon'them. 4 Alabama Power Company has compiled this information and provides it as_an enclosure to this letter.-

In: agreement with the views presented by INPO in their letter to the NR'C dated' ,

. February 7, 1990, Alabama Power Company has not' included the time spent by.

J' . managers during INP0 assistance visits. Alabama Power Company agrees-that such visits are typically in response to 'a utility's: request. for assistance in b  : a particular area.

e Please recognize that the input provided for upper management involvement'only L reflects.the time spent for Farley Nuclear Plant, even:though the " Chief l' Nuclear Officer and one of the two " Corporate Vice Presidents" have-p,

.' responsibilities for other plants within the Southern Company. i O

LA labama Power Company appreciates the opportunity to provide input into the t ls NRC's efforts to improve the regulatory process. If there are any further questions, please advise.

1 Respectfully submitted, v

((l hfT +

V. G. Hairston, III

-VGH,III/BHV:mgd 14.36 Enclosure cc Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. A. Reeves Mr. G. F. Maxwell 9003080350 900301 e

vV[

A /')

PDR p

ADOCK 05000348l4 PNV 9 g j

=

.h

{ r N j

.NRC Regulatory Inpact Survey +

Questionnaire Sheet

1. Type of-inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC h am Inspections l l

.I F

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often il .is this activity conducted? Annually

=;

l

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: All areas of plant operation,-

security, fire protection and environmental qualification

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 10 people for 10 days t l

l r

l '

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers inust spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to'the activity described in Item #1.

~a. Plant Department Heads 540 (number involved) 9

b. Plant Manager 68

c. Corporate Department Heads 780 (number involved) 7

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 56 (number involved) 2

.c. Chief Nuclear officer 8

f. Other Supervisors 1310 (number involved) 18 I

Note: Times are given in total manhours.

l' NRC Regulatory Inpact Survey Questionnaire Sheet ,

l1. Type of inspection, audit'or evaluation: Other NRC Resident, Regional and Headquarters Inspections / Audits

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years,'about how often

'is this activity conducted? Resident - once per month; Regional and ,

Headquarters - once every 2 weeks Operations / Construction areas covered: All areas of plant operation

3. .

and emergency preparedness V

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)  : person for 5 days

5. Approximate percentage of total time (cn an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1. ..

a. Plant Department Heads 650 (number involved) 9

b. Plant Manager 112

c. Corporate Department Heads 610 (number involved) 7 e d. . Corporate Vice Presidents 200 (number. involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 24

f. O'.her Supervisors 1866 (number involved) 18 Note: Times are given in total manhours.

t NRC Regulatory Impact Survey 4'I Questionnaire Sheet.

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: INPO Evaluation

2. -Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Every 18 months ,

A

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: All areas of plant operation -

and administration

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 15 to 20 people for 10 days

.i

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct ~ involvement before, during; and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 760 (number _ involved) 9

b. Plant Manager 168 c._ Corporate Department Heads 370 (number involved) 7

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 80 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 16

-f. Other Supervisors. 1830 (number involved) 18

' Note: . Times are given in total manhours.

l L

l 1

4 2

-NRC Regulatary Impact Survey

~

k. Questionnaire Sheet _;

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Insurers-(ANI) Audits l

l

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity, conducted? Quarterly i J

'l

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: -Operation and maintenance of plant equipment i.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 1 person for ,

I wek

5. Approximate _ percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and _;

'in response to the activity described.in Item #1.  ;

I

'a. Plant Department Heads 180 (number involved) 6'

b. Plant Manager' 20

c. Corporate Department Heads _ 50 (number involved)- 3-

d. Corporate Vice-Presidents 12 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear officer 0

f. Other Supervisors 458 (number involved) 10 l

Note: Times are given in total manhours.

1.'

lI

~

1 NRC Regultt*ry Impact-Survey Questionnaire Sheet t

l. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: EPA Audits

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this e Mivity conducted?_ Annually T

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Environmental protection administration and training

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2 people for i day i

t

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 20 (number' involved) 2 b.. Plant Manager 2

c. Corporate Department Heads 0 (number involved) 0

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 0 (number.' involved) O

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Supervisors 40 (number involved) 2 Note: Times are given in total manhours.

J i

t NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet .g

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: OSHA Audits

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often  ;

is this activity conducted? No recent OSHA audits have been conducted; this audit activity is currently being conducted by the NRC .

3.. Operations / Construction areas covered: N/A l

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 'N/A t

'[

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 0 (number involved) 0

b. Plant Manager _ 0

c. Corporate Department Heads 0 (number involved) 0 i

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 0 (number involved) 0

e. . Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Supervisors 0 (number involved) 0

~: Note: Times are given in total manhours.

l l

l r - -

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet *

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: tor Audits _

7

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? No DOT audits have been conducted in recent years i

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: N/A t

, .i

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) _ N/A L

l

5. Approximate percentage of. total time (on an annual basis) which the l- following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, 11 and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

l

a. Plant Department Heads 0 -(number involved) 0 l-l l- b. Plant Manager 0

c. Corporate Department Heads- 0 (number involved) 0 d.- Corporate Vice Presidents 0 .(number involved) . 0 ,

1

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0 1

f. ,0ther Supervisors 0- (number involved) 0 l

i i

l. Note: Times are given in total manhours.-

I 1

l l

1 j

n ~

~

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet i

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluations. State / Local Authorities ,

n

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?. Approximately three times per year

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Hazardous waste, environmental protection, radiation protection (radiography), drinking water, sewage treatment

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2 people for 1-day

b. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1. '

a. Plant Department Heads. 100 (number. involved) 2

b. Plant Manager 24

c. Corporate Department Heads 0 (number involved) 0

d. Corporate vice Presidents 24 (number involved) 2 ,_

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 0

f. Other Supervisors 20 (number involved) 2 1 -Note: Times are given in total manhours.

l l

o

~

f~

i

. I NRC Regulatory Impact Survey _,

Questionnaire Sheet l

1. Type of inspection,-audit or evaluation: WRC-Required @ Audits  ;

l

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Approximately 30 audits per year- ,

Operations / Construction areas covered: All areas of plant operation 3.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 3 people ,

for 15 days i

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the ,

following. managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 880 (number involved) 9

b. Plant. Manager 48

c. Corporate Department Heads 490 (number involved) 7

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 176 (number involved) 2 ,

s e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other. Supervisors 1296 (number involved) 18 Note: Times are given in total manhours.

3

.s.

g 4 -

y-y

'NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet k Self-Assessments resulting l1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:.

from external c-4 tments i I

2. -Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often a 1

.is.this activity conducted? Semi-annually  ;

)

3. ' Operations / Construction areas covered: Configuration Management i

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 7 people for 15 f

(

days _

i k

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response.to the activity described in Item #1.

a. Plant Department Heads 320- (number involved) 9

b. Plant Manager 68 Corporate Department Heads 376 (number involved) 7 j c.

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 32 (number involved)- '2  :

e. Chief Nuclear Officer- 4

f. Other Supervisors 652 (number involved) 14 l

7 L

Note: - Times are given in total manhours.

r

i i

l NRC Regulatory Inpact Survey l

Questionnaire Sheet {

r

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Other: Plant Visits by NRC Upper Management

2. assed on actual e .iience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? .Approximately 4 visits per year ,

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Tour of facility including dis-cussion and observation of plant operations and management i

L

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how hog) 2 people for 1 '

day 4

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1. l

a. Plant Department Heads 64 (number involved) 4 j

b. Plant Manager 48

c. Corporate Department Heads 16 (number involved) 2 L d. Corporate V he Presidents 48 (number involved) 2

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 8

f. Other Supervisors 36 (number involved) 2 i

i Note: Timeu are given in total manhours.

1 l'

l

- _..